Minority Stress Clusters and Health and Cancer Care Outcomes of Sexual and Gender Minority Cancer Survivors.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH LGBT health Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1089/lgbt.2024.0311
Oscar Y Franco-Rocha, Ashley M Henneghan, Shelli R Kesler, Christopher W Wheldon
{"title":"Minority Stress Clusters and Health and Cancer Care Outcomes of Sexual and Gender Minority Cancer Survivors.","authors":"Oscar Y Franco-Rocha, Ashley M Henneghan, Shelli R Kesler, Christopher W Wheldon","doi":"10.1089/lgbt.2024.0311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> Structural factors affect the health of sexual and gender minority (SGM) cancer survivors, yet how people experience minority stress within their social and health care systems remains unclear. We explored experiences of minority stress across health care and sociocultural contexts and their impact on health and cancer outcomes. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We conducted a K-medoid cluster analysis (grouping technique) using data from 2519 participants (training subset = 2015, testing subset = 504) from OUT: The National Cancer Survey (2020-2021). Cluster differences in the testing subset were assessed using chi-square, analysis of variance, and nonparametric tests. Regression models examined associations between cluster membership and health (mentally unhealthy days) and cancer outcomes (perceived welcomeness after identity disclosure and treatment satisfaction), adjusting for demographic and clinical factors. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Five clusters emerged, differing in demographics, mental and social health outcomes, SGM identity disclosure, and perceived welcomeness after disclosure (0.017 < <i>p</i> < 0.001). Cluster one experienced poorer mental health than cluster five (odds ratio [OR] = 1.182, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.003-1.392), lower cancer care satisfaction than all other clusters (1.177 < OR <1.265; 1.091 < 95% CI <1.389), and perceived less welcoming or unchanged environments after SGM identity disclosure than all other clusters (1.278 < OR <1.314; 1.161 < 95% CI <1.431). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The study highlights the impact of minority stress across different contexts. The findings emphasize the need for targeted interventions to address the unique vulnerabilities of SGM individuals, particularly in health care contexts, to improve their overall health and cancer care experiences.</p>","PeriodicalId":18062,"journal":{"name":"LGBT health","volume":" ","pages":"329-339"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LGBT health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lgbt.2024.0311","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Structural factors affect the health of sexual and gender minority (SGM) cancer survivors, yet how people experience minority stress within their social and health care systems remains unclear. We explored experiences of minority stress across health care and sociocultural contexts and their impact on health and cancer outcomes. Methods: We conducted a K-medoid cluster analysis (grouping technique) using data from 2519 participants (training subset = 2015, testing subset = 504) from OUT: The National Cancer Survey (2020-2021). Cluster differences in the testing subset were assessed using chi-square, analysis of variance, and nonparametric tests. Regression models examined associations between cluster membership and health (mentally unhealthy days) and cancer outcomes (perceived welcomeness after identity disclosure and treatment satisfaction), adjusting for demographic and clinical factors. Results: Five clusters emerged, differing in demographics, mental and social health outcomes, SGM identity disclosure, and perceived welcomeness after disclosure (0.017 < p < 0.001). Cluster one experienced poorer mental health than cluster five (odds ratio [OR] = 1.182, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.003-1.392), lower cancer care satisfaction than all other clusters (1.177 < OR <1.265; 1.091 < 95% CI <1.389), and perceived less welcoming or unchanged environments after SGM identity disclosure than all other clusters (1.278 < OR <1.314; 1.161 < 95% CI <1.431). Conclusion: The study highlights the impact of minority stress across different contexts. The findings emphasize the need for targeted interventions to address the unique vulnerabilities of SGM individuals, particularly in health care contexts, to improve their overall health and cancer care experiences.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
少数族裔压力集群与性和性别少数族裔癌症幸存者的健康和癌症护理结果。
目的:结构性因素影响性和性别少数群体(SGM)癌症幸存者的健康,但人们如何在其社会和医疗保健系统中经历少数群体压力仍不清楚。我们探讨了医疗保健和社会文化背景下的少数民族压力经历及其对健康和癌症结局的影响。方法:我们使用来自OUT: The National Cancer Survey(2020-2021)的2519名参与者(培训子集= 2015,测试子集= 504)的数据进行k - median聚类分析(分组技术)。使用卡方、方差分析和非参数检验评估测试子集中的聚类差异。回归模型检验了集群成员与健康(心理不健康天数)和癌症结果(身份披露后的感知欢迎程度和治疗满意度)之间的关系,并根据人口统计学和临床因素进行了调整。结果:出现了5个集群,在人口统计学、心理和社会健康结果、SGM身份披露和披露后的受欢迎程度方面存在差异(0.017 < p < 0.001)。聚类1的心理健康状况差于聚类5(比值比[OR] = 1.182, 95%可信区间[CI] = 1.003 ~ 1.392),聚类1的癌症护理满意度低于其他聚类(1.177 < OR)。研究结果强调需要有针对性的干预措施,以解决SGM个体的独特脆弱性,特别是在卫生保健环境中,以改善他们的整体健康和癌症护理体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
LGBT health
LGBT health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: LGBT Health is the premier peer-reviewed journal dedicated to promoting optimal healthcare for millions of sexual and gender minority persons worldwide by focusing specifically on health while maintaining sufficient breadth to encompass the full range of relevant biopsychosocial and health policy issues. This Journal aims to promote greater awareness of the health concerns particular to each sexual minority population, and to improve availability and delivery of culturally appropriate healthcare services. LGBT Health also encourages further research and increased funding in this critical but currently underserved domain. The Journal provides a much-needed authoritative source and international forum in all areas pertinent to LGBT health and healthcare services. Contributions from all continents are solicited including Asia and Africa which are currently underrepresented in sex research.
期刊最新文献
Association Between Mental Health and Nicotine/Tobacco Use by Disaggregated Gender Identities Among U.S. Adolescents, 2020-2023. Differences in Substance Use and Mental Health by Sexual Identity Among U.S. Adolescents and Young Adults. Risk Factors for Substance Use Among Sexually and Gender Diverse Latine Youth and Young Adults: A Systematic Review. Disparities in Substance Use and Psychological Distress During Pregnancy Among Pregnant Bisexual and Heterosexual Females in the United States, 2021-2023. Mental and Physical Health Conditions Among Sexually Diverse and Gender-Diverse Autistic Adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1