Digital CBT for insomnia and emotion regulation in the workplace: a randomised waitlist-controlled trial.

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Psychological Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1017/S0033291725000194
Talar R Moukhtarian, Sophie Fletcher, Lukasz Walasek, Krishane Patel, Carla Toro, Anna L Hurley-Wallace, Charlotte Kershaw, Sean Russel, Guy Daly, Nicole K Y Tang, Caroline Meyer
{"title":"Digital CBT for insomnia and emotion regulation in the workplace: a randomised waitlist-controlled trial.","authors":"Talar R Moukhtarian, Sophie Fletcher, Lukasz Walasek, Krishane Patel, Carla Toro, Anna L Hurley-Wallace, Charlotte Kershaw, Sean Russel, Guy Daly, Nicole K Y Tang, Caroline Meyer","doi":"10.1017/S0033291725000194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) is the recommended first-line treatment for insomnia. However, scaling this proven effective intervention to areas of high need remains a challenge, necessitating sensitive adaptation and evaluation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomised waitlist-controlled trial evaluated the efficacy of a hybrid digital CBT-I and emotion regulation (dCBT-I + ER) intervention delivered through workplaces. Participants with at least mild insomnia and depression or anxiety symptoms were randomised to the intervention or waitlist control groups. The intervention was delivered via a web-based platform and four video-conferencing therapy sessions. Participants tracked their sleep using actigraphy and a sleep diary that was used to pace the intervention delivered. Assessments occurred at baseline and 8 weeks post-randomisation, measuring insomnia, depression, anxiety, psychological well-being, quality of life, and work productivity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 159 participants (mean age 43.6 ± 9.4 years, 76.7% female, 80.5% white), 80 received the intervention and 79 were in the control group. The intervention group showed significant improvements in insomnia (F1, 134 = 71.46, p < .0001); depression (F1, 134 = 35.67, p < .0001); and anxiety (F1, 134 = 17.63, p < .0001), with large effect sizes (d = 0.7-1.5). Sleep diary data supported these findings, whereas actigraphy data did not. Improvements in psychological well-being were significant (F1, 132.13 = 10.64, p < 0.001), whereas quality of life, work productivity, and satisfaction outcomes were not.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests that a hybrid dCBT-I + ER intervention, delivered via workplaces, effectively improves insomnia, depression, and anxiety. It holds promise as a scalable solution, warranting further investigation into its long-term efficacy and economic impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":"55 ","pages":"e52"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12080640/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291725000194","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) is the recommended first-line treatment for insomnia. However, scaling this proven effective intervention to areas of high need remains a challenge, necessitating sensitive adaptation and evaluation.

Methods: A randomised waitlist-controlled trial evaluated the efficacy of a hybrid digital CBT-I and emotion regulation (dCBT-I + ER) intervention delivered through workplaces. Participants with at least mild insomnia and depression or anxiety symptoms were randomised to the intervention or waitlist control groups. The intervention was delivered via a web-based platform and four video-conferencing therapy sessions. Participants tracked their sleep using actigraphy and a sleep diary that was used to pace the intervention delivered. Assessments occurred at baseline and 8 weeks post-randomisation, measuring insomnia, depression, anxiety, psychological well-being, quality of life, and work productivity.

Results: Of the 159 participants (mean age 43.6 ± 9.4 years, 76.7% female, 80.5% white), 80 received the intervention and 79 were in the control group. The intervention group showed significant improvements in insomnia (F1, 134 = 71.46, p < .0001); depression (F1, 134 = 35.67, p < .0001); and anxiety (F1, 134 = 17.63, p < .0001), with large effect sizes (d = 0.7-1.5). Sleep diary data supported these findings, whereas actigraphy data did not. Improvements in psychological well-being were significant (F1, 132.13 = 10.64, p < 0.001), whereas quality of life, work productivity, and satisfaction outcomes were not.

Conclusions: This study suggests that a hybrid dCBT-I + ER intervention, delivered via workplaces, effectively improves insomnia, depression, and anxiety. It holds promise as a scalable solution, warranting further investigation into its long-term efficacy and economic impact.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字认知行为治疗失眠和工作场所情绪调节:一项随机候补对照试验。
背景:认知行为治疗失眠(CBT-I)是推荐的失眠一线治疗方法。然而,将这种被证明有效的干预措施推广到高需求地区仍然是一项挑战,需要进行敏感的适应和评估。方法:一项随机等待对照试验评估了通过工作场所提供的混合数字CBT-I和情绪调节(dCBT-I + ER)干预的效果。至少有轻度失眠、抑郁或焦虑症状的参与者被随机分为干预组或等候组。干预通过网络平台和四次视频会议治疗进行。参与者使用活动记录仪和睡眠日记来跟踪他们的睡眠,睡眠日记被用来衡量干预措施的实施速度。在基线和随机化后8周进行评估,测量失眠、抑郁、焦虑、心理健康、生活质量和工作效率。结果:159例患者(平均年龄43.6±9.4岁,女性76.7%,白人80.5%)中,干预组80例,对照组79例。结论:本研究表明,通过工作场所进行dCBT-I + ER混合干预,可有效改善失眠、抑郁和焦虑。它有望成为一种可扩展的解决方案,值得进一步研究其长期功效和经济影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Medicine
Psychological Medicine 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
711
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Now in its fifth decade of publication, Psychological Medicine is a leading international journal in the fields of psychiatry, related aspects of psychology and basic sciences. From 2014, there are 16 issues a year, each featuring original articles reporting key research being undertaken worldwide, together with shorter editorials by distinguished scholars and an important book review section. The journal''s success is clearly demonstrated by a consistently high impact factor.
期刊最新文献
Shared and distinct alterations in brain connectivity and cognitive function in subthreshold and major depression. Novel epigenetic loci identified from an epigenome-wide association study underlying brain structural changes in bipolar disorder. Anhedonia underlies the association between childhood unpredictability and adult PTSD symptoms: Evidence from three independent longitudinal cohorts. Dynamic coactivation patterns during repetitive negative thinking: A cross-sectional fMRI study. Oxytocin facilitates top-down and bottom-up attention to emotional faces in a general and temporal-dependent manner.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1