Association between immunotherapy timing and efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer: a comprehensive analysis at a high-volume specialist centre.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Translational lung cancer research Pub Date : 2025-01-24 Epub Date: 2025-01-20 DOI:10.21037/tlcr-24-571
Igor Gomez-Randulfe, Mark Pearce, Daniel Netto, Rebecca Ward, Raffaele Califano
{"title":"Association between immunotherapy timing and efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer: a comprehensive analysis at a high-volume specialist centre.","authors":"Igor Gomez-Randulfe, Mark Pearce, Daniel Netto, Rebecca Ward, Raffaele Califano","doi":"10.21037/tlcr-24-571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The timing of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) administration may influence clinical outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Previous studies have shown varying effects of chronotherapy on survival rates, with some suggesting that a higher percentage of doses administered in the morning improves overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the timing of the first dose and the percentage of doses administered in the afternoon on survival outcomes in advanced NSCLC patients, as well as explore seasonal variations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary cancer centre of patients diagnosed with NSCLC and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥50% who received first-line palliative treatment with pembrolizumab or atezolizumab. Patients were categorized based on the timing of their first dose (before or after 14:30) and further stratified by the percentage of doses received after 14:30. To evaluate seasonal variance, patients were also stratified into two groups: those who received their first dose within three months before or after the winter solstice (\"Winter group\") and those who received it within three months before or after the summer solstice (\"Summer group\"). Survival analysis was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 349 patients who met the inclusion criteria. There was no significant difference in PFS or OS between patients receiving their first ICI dose before 14:30 (n=188) and those receiving it after 14:30 (n=161). However, a significant difference in OS was observed in patients who received more than 50% of their doses in the afternoon. Seasonal variations in dosing timing did not significantly impact survival outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study suggests that the timing of the first ICI dose does not significantly affect survival outcomes in advanced NSCLC patients. However, patients receiving a higher percentage of their doses in the afternoon may experience poorer OS. Further prospective research is needed to confirm these findings and understand the underlying mechanisms before any changes to clinical practice can be recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":23271,"journal":{"name":"Translational lung cancer research","volume":"14 1","pages":"72-80"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11826263/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational lung cancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-24-571","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The timing of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) administration may influence clinical outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Previous studies have shown varying effects of chronotherapy on survival rates, with some suggesting that a higher percentage of doses administered in the morning improves overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the timing of the first dose and the percentage of doses administered in the afternoon on survival outcomes in advanced NSCLC patients, as well as explore seasonal variations.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary cancer centre of patients diagnosed with NSCLC and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥50% who received first-line palliative treatment with pembrolizumab or atezolizumab. Patients were categorized based on the timing of their first dose (before or after 14:30) and further stratified by the percentage of doses received after 14:30. To evaluate seasonal variance, patients were also stratified into two groups: those who received their first dose within three months before or after the winter solstice ("Winter group") and those who received it within three months before or after the summer solstice ("Summer group"). Survival analysis was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results: We identified 349 patients who met the inclusion criteria. There was no significant difference in PFS or OS between patients receiving their first ICI dose before 14:30 (n=188) and those receiving it after 14:30 (n=161). However, a significant difference in OS was observed in patients who received more than 50% of their doses in the afternoon. Seasonal variations in dosing timing did not significantly impact survival outcomes.

Conclusions: Our study suggests that the timing of the first ICI dose does not significantly affect survival outcomes in advanced NSCLC patients. However, patients receiving a higher percentage of their doses in the afternoon may experience poorer OS. Further prospective research is needed to confirm these findings and understand the underlying mechanisms before any changes to clinical practice can be recommended.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非小细胞肺癌的免疫治疗时机与疗效之间的关系:一个高容量专科中心的综合分析。
背景:免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)给药的时机可能会影响非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的临床结果。先前的研究表明,时间疗法对生存率有不同的影响,一些研究表明,在早晨给药的比例较高,可以提高总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)。本研究旨在评估首次给药时间和下午给药比例对晚期NSCLC患者生存结果的影响,并探讨季节变化。方法:我们在一个三级癌症中心进行了一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象是被诊断为NSCLC且程序性细胞死亡配体1 (PD-L1)表达≥50%的患者,他们接受了派姆单抗或阿特唑单抗的一线姑息治疗。根据首次给药时间(14:30之前或之后)对患者进行分类,并根据14:30之后接受的剂量百分比进一步分层。为了评估季节差异,患者也被分为两组:在冬至前后三个月内接受第一剂的患者(“冬季组”)和在夏至前后三个月内接受第一剂的患者(“夏季组”)。生存率分析采用Kaplan-Meier法。结果:我们确定了349例符合纳入标准的患者。在14:30之前(n=188)和14:30之后(n=161)接受首次ICI治疗的患者的PFS或OS无显著差异。然而,在下午接受超过50%剂量的患者中,观察到OS的显着差异。给药时间的季节性变化对生存结果没有显著影响。结论:我们的研究表明,首次ICI剂量的时机对晚期NSCLC患者的生存结果没有显著影响。然而,在下午接受较高比例剂量的患者可能会出现较差的OS。在建议改变临床实践之前,需要进一步的前瞻性研究来证实这些发现并了解潜在的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.50%
发文量
137
期刊介绍: Translational Lung Cancer Research(TLCR, Transl Lung Cancer Res, Print ISSN 2218-6751; Online ISSN 2226-4477) is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal, which was founded in March 2012. TLCR is indexed by PubMed/PubMed Central and the Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) Databases. It is published quarterly the first year, and published bimonthly since February 2013. It provides practical up-to-date information on prevention, early detection, diagnosis, and treatment of lung cancer. Specific areas of its interest include, but not limited to, multimodality therapy, markers, imaging, tumor biology, pathology, chemoprevention, and technical advances related to lung cancer.
期刊最新文献
Immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge in advanced NSCLC: prognostic value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. Impact of pleural lavage fluid volume on perioperative outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Utility of various programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) assays in predicting the clinical benefit of immune checkpoint inhibitors in PD-L1-expressing non-small-cell lung cancer patients: a systematic review. Lung cancer survivorship: natural language processing for automated abstraction of follow-up computed tomography indication. RACGAP1 defines a malignant proliferative niche and represents a therapeutic vulnerability in lung adenocarcinoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1