Rapid detection of non-small cell lung cancer driver mutations using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction analysis of bronchial washings: a prospective multicenter study.
{"title":"Rapid detection of non-small cell lung cancer driver mutations using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction analysis of bronchial washings: a prospective multicenter study.","authors":"Kohei Somekawa, Nobuaki Kobayashi, Satoshi Nagaoka, Kenichi Seki, Yukihito Kajita, Suguru Muraoka, Ami Izawa, Ayami Kaneko, Yukiko Otsu, Momo Hirata, Sousuke Kubo, Ryo Nagasawa, Kota Murohashi, Hiroaki Fuji, Shuhei Teranishi, Ken Tashiro, Keisuke Watanabe, Nobuyuki Horita, Yu Hara, Makoto Kudo, Takeshi Kaneko","doi":"10.21037/tlcr-24-772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Molecular profiling of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is crucial for personalized treatment, but obtaining adequate tumor tissue can be challenging. This study evaluated the utility of droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) analysis of bronchial washings (BWs) and serum for detecting driver oncogene mutations in NSCLC patients, comparing its performance to standard tissue genotyping methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective, multicenter study conducted at two university hospitals in Yokohama, Japan, 73 treatment-naïve NSCLC patients underwent bronchoscopy with BW collection and blood sampling between October 2022 and April 2024. ddPCR was performed on BW and serum samples to detect epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR; L858R, exon 19 deletions, G719X), KRAS (G12/13), and BRAF (V600E) mutations. Results were compared with standard tissue genotyping methods, including AmoyDx and Oncomine Dx Target Test (DxTT) assays. Turnaround time (TAT) for results was also assessed. The study protocol was approved by the institutional review boards, and all participants provided informed consent.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ddPCR analysis of BW samples showed high concordance with tissue genotyping, detecting EGFR mutations in 31.5% of cases (identical to tissue). For common EGFR mutations (L858R and exon 19 deletions), BW genotyping demonstrated 100% sensitivity and 98.0% specificity compared to tissue. TAT was significantly shorter for BW ddPCR compared to tissue genotyping (4.4±1.8 <i>vs.</i> 20.4±7.7 days, P<0.001). Serum ddPCR showed lower sensitivity (7.8% <i>vs.</i> 33.3% for EGFR mutations) compared to tissue genotyping, with detection associated with the presence of bone metastases. KRAS and BRAF mutations were detected at similar rates in BW and tissue samples, but at lower rates in serum.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ddPCR analysis of BWs demonstrates high accuracy and rapid TAT for detecting common driver mutations in NSCLC. This approach represents a promising alternative to tissue biopsy for molecular profiling, potentially expediting treatment decisions. While serum ddPCR showed limited utility, it may complement tissue genotyping in specific clinical scenarios.</p>","PeriodicalId":23271,"journal":{"name":"Translational lung cancer research","volume":"14 2","pages":"353-362"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11921443/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational lung cancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-24-772","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Molecular profiling of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is crucial for personalized treatment, but obtaining adequate tumor tissue can be challenging. This study evaluated the utility of droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) analysis of bronchial washings (BWs) and serum for detecting driver oncogene mutations in NSCLC patients, comparing its performance to standard tissue genotyping methods.
Methods: In this prospective, multicenter study conducted at two university hospitals in Yokohama, Japan, 73 treatment-naïve NSCLC patients underwent bronchoscopy with BW collection and blood sampling between October 2022 and April 2024. ddPCR was performed on BW and serum samples to detect epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR; L858R, exon 19 deletions, G719X), KRAS (G12/13), and BRAF (V600E) mutations. Results were compared with standard tissue genotyping methods, including AmoyDx and Oncomine Dx Target Test (DxTT) assays. Turnaround time (TAT) for results was also assessed. The study protocol was approved by the institutional review boards, and all participants provided informed consent.
Results: ddPCR analysis of BW samples showed high concordance with tissue genotyping, detecting EGFR mutations in 31.5% of cases (identical to tissue). For common EGFR mutations (L858R and exon 19 deletions), BW genotyping demonstrated 100% sensitivity and 98.0% specificity compared to tissue. TAT was significantly shorter for BW ddPCR compared to tissue genotyping (4.4±1.8 vs. 20.4±7.7 days, P<0.001). Serum ddPCR showed lower sensitivity (7.8% vs. 33.3% for EGFR mutations) compared to tissue genotyping, with detection associated with the presence of bone metastases. KRAS and BRAF mutations were detected at similar rates in BW and tissue samples, but at lower rates in serum.
Conclusions: ddPCR analysis of BWs demonstrates high accuracy and rapid TAT for detecting common driver mutations in NSCLC. This approach represents a promising alternative to tissue biopsy for molecular profiling, potentially expediting treatment decisions. While serum ddPCR showed limited utility, it may complement tissue genotyping in specific clinical scenarios.
期刊介绍:
Translational Lung Cancer Research(TLCR, Transl Lung Cancer Res, Print ISSN 2218-6751; Online ISSN 2226-4477) is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal, which was founded in March 2012. TLCR is indexed by PubMed/PubMed Central and the Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) Databases. It is published quarterly the first year, and published bimonthly since February 2013. It provides practical up-to-date information on prevention, early detection, diagnosis, and treatment of lung cancer. Specific areas of its interest include, but not limited to, multimodality therapy, markers, imaging, tumor biology, pathology, chemoprevention, and technical advances related to lung cancer.