Development of a cross-cultural scale on attitudes toward gender and sexual diversity (AGSD).

IF 2.2 Q2 SOCIOLOGY Frontiers in Sociology Pub Date : 2025-01-31 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fsoc.2025.1510002
Daniel Oleas, Xochitl Garza-Olivares, Fernando Silva Teixeira-Filho, Guido Mascialino, Jose A Rodas
{"title":"Development of a cross-cultural scale on attitudes toward gender and sexual diversity (AGSD).","authors":"Daniel Oleas, Xochitl Garza-Olivares, Fernando Silva Teixeira-Filho, Guido Mascialino, Jose A Rodas","doi":"10.3389/fsoc.2025.1510002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Attitudes toward gender and sexual diversity can range from acceptance to rejection, influenced by various social, psychological, and cultural factors. In Latin America, instruments tailored to measure these attitudes within specific cultural contexts are limited. This study aimed to develop and validate a culturally relevant scale to assess attitudes toward gender and sexual diversity in Ecuador.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The research was conducted in two studies. In Study 1, an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed on data collected from 225 psychology students to identify the scale's structure. In Study 2, a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted with 362 students to confirm the factor structure and assess the scale's validity. The final scale comprised 18 items across three factors: social coexistence, moral and pathological views, and stereotypes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The scale demonstrated sound psychometric properties, with acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.74-0.77). Factor loadings ranged from 0.56 to 0.87, confirming the robustness of the scale. Three distinct factors were identified, providing a comprehensive measure of attitudes toward gender and sexual diversity in social, psychological, and behavioral contexts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This scale represents a valuable tool for assessing attitudes toward gender and sexual diversity in Latin American populations. Future research should test its applicability across broader populations and in different Latin American countries to further validate its use and generalizability.</p>","PeriodicalId":36297,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sociology","volume":"10 ","pages":"1510002"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11825456/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2025.1510002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Attitudes toward gender and sexual diversity can range from acceptance to rejection, influenced by various social, psychological, and cultural factors. In Latin America, instruments tailored to measure these attitudes within specific cultural contexts are limited. This study aimed to develop and validate a culturally relevant scale to assess attitudes toward gender and sexual diversity in Ecuador.

Methods: The research was conducted in two studies. In Study 1, an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed on data collected from 225 psychology students to identify the scale's structure. In Study 2, a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted with 362 students to confirm the factor structure and assess the scale's validity. The final scale comprised 18 items across three factors: social coexistence, moral and pathological views, and stereotypes.

Results: The scale demonstrated sound psychometric properties, with acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.74-0.77). Factor loadings ranged from 0.56 to 0.87, confirming the robustness of the scale. Three distinct factors were identified, providing a comprehensive measure of attitudes toward gender and sexual diversity in social, psychological, and behavioral contexts.

Conclusion: This scale represents a valuable tool for assessing attitudes toward gender and sexual diversity in Latin American populations. Future research should test its applicability across broader populations and in different Latin American countries to further validate its use and generalizability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
跨文化性别与性多样性态度量表的编制。
背景:受各种社会、心理和文化因素的影响,对性别和性多样性的态度可以从接受到拒绝。在拉丁美洲,在特定文化背景下衡量这些态度的工具是有限的。本研究旨在开发和验证一个文化相关的量表,以评估厄瓜多尔对性别和性多样性的态度。方法:分为两组进行研究。研究1采用探索性因子分析(EFA)对225名心理学专业学生的数据进行分析,以确定量表的结构。研究2对362名学生进行验证性因子分析(confirmatory factor analysis, CFA),确认因子结构并评估量表的效度。最终的量表包括18个项目,涉及三个因素:社会共存、道德和病理观点以及刻板印象。结果:量表具有良好的心理测量特性,具有可接受的内部一致性(Cronbach's α = 0.74-0.77)。因子负荷范围为0.56 ~ 0.87,证实了量表的稳健性。研究确定了三个不同的因素,提供了在社会、心理和行为背景下对性别和性多样性的态度的综合衡量。结论:该量表是评估拉丁美洲人口对性别和性多样性态度的有价值的工具。未来的研究应在更广泛的人群和不同的拉丁美洲国家测试其适用性,以进一步验证其使用和推广。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Sociology
Frontiers in Sociology Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
198
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
General perception of the diversification of child-rearing environments in Japan. Cultural barriers to stunting prevention: a case study of the Baduy indigenous tribe in Indonesia. Experts' subjective theories: how did they explain post-pandemic school violence in their public discourse through digital media? "Warmi urquy": marriage proposals and gender hierarchy in the Peruvian Andes. In the room but not on the byline: trust, fear, and the human role in addiction science in the age of AI.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1