Enhancing Patient Education on Cardiovascular Rehabilitation with Large Language Models.

Missouri medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-01
Som Singh, Eric Errampalli, Nathan Errampalli, Mohammed Shah Miran
{"title":"Enhancing Patient Education on Cardiovascular Rehabilitation with Large Language Models.","authors":"Som Singh, Eric Errampalli, Nathan Errampalli, Mohammed Shah Miran","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There are barriers that exist for individuals to adhere to cardiovascular rehabilitation programs. A key driver to patient adherence is appropriately educating patients. A growing education tool is using large language models to answer patient questions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the readability quality of educational responses provided by large language models for questions regarding cardiac rehabilitation using Gunning Fog, Flesh Kincaid, and Flesch Reading Ease scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings of this study demonstrate that the mean Gunning Fog, Flesch Kincaid, and Flesch Reading Ease scores do not meet US grade reading level recommendations across three models: ChatGPT 3.5, Copilot, and Gemini. The Gemini and Copilot models demonstrated greater ease of readability compared to ChatGPT 3.5.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Large language models could serve as educational tools on cardiovascular rehabilitation, but there remains a need to improve the text readability for these to effectively educate patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":74203,"journal":{"name":"Missouri medicine","volume":"122 1","pages":"67-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11827661/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Missouri medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: There are barriers that exist for individuals to adhere to cardiovascular rehabilitation programs. A key driver to patient adherence is appropriately educating patients. A growing education tool is using large language models to answer patient questions.

Methods: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the readability quality of educational responses provided by large language models for questions regarding cardiac rehabilitation using Gunning Fog, Flesh Kincaid, and Flesch Reading Ease scores.

Results: The findings of this study demonstrate that the mean Gunning Fog, Flesch Kincaid, and Flesch Reading Ease scores do not meet US grade reading level recommendations across three models: ChatGPT 3.5, Copilot, and Gemini. The Gemini and Copilot models demonstrated greater ease of readability compared to ChatGPT 3.5.

Conclusions: Large language models could serve as educational tools on cardiovascular rehabilitation, but there remains a need to improve the text readability for these to effectively educate patients.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用大语言模型加强心血管康复患者教育。
引言:个体坚持心血管康复计划存在障碍。患者依从性的一个关键驱动因素是对患者进行适当的教育。一种日益发展的教育工具是使用大型语言模型来回答病人的问题。方法:本研究的主要目的是使用Gunning Fog、Flesh Kincaid和Flesch Reading Ease评分来评估由大型语言模型提供的有关心脏康复问题的教育反应的可读性。结果:本研究的结果表明,在ChatGPT 3.5、Copilot和Gemini三种模型中,Gunning Fog、Flesch Kincaid和Flesch Reading Ease的平均得分不符合美国年级阅读水平建议。与ChatGPT 3.5相比,Gemini和Copilot模型的可读性更强。结论:大型语言模型可以作为心血管康复的教育工具,但仍需要提高文本的可读性,以有效地教育患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Food Dating: What Does it Really Mean? Excessive Exercise Unenviable Victim of Irony. Massive Data Breech Predicted by Missouri Medicine Eventuates. Shaping the Future: Why Physician Advocacy Matters for Patients, Physicians, and the Health System. They Stole Your Umbrella: Why Healthcare Professionals Should Support Stronger Fraud Controls.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1