Efficacy of mobile health interventions in the conservative management of chronic low back pain in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis.

IF 3.1 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Pain Reports Pub Date : 2025-02-13 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1097/PR9.0000000000001242
Babina Rani, Mayank Gupta, Venkata Ganesh, Rajni Sharma, Anuj Bhatia, Babita Ghai
{"title":"Efficacy of mobile health interventions in the conservative management of chronic low back pain in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis.","authors":"Babina Rani, Mayank Gupta, Venkata Ganesh, Rajni Sharma, Anuj Bhatia, Babita Ghai","doi":"10.1097/PR9.0000000000001242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a major global health issue, particularly severe in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where health care resources and accessibility are limited. Mobile health (mHealth) interventions offer a promising solution by leveraging technology to deliver health care services remotely. This review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of mHealth interventions in managing CLBP in LMICs. A comprehensive search of electronic databases was performed for studies published until June 2024, evaluating mHealth interventions for CLBP in LMICs. Primary outcomes measured were pain intensity and disability, while secondary outcomes included quality of life (QoL). Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (RoB2), and quality of evidence was evaluated using GRADE. Robustness of meta-analysis results was assessed via trial sequential analysis (TSA). Seven studies met the inclusion criteria. The mHealth interventions significantly reduced the overall pain intensity (MD = -1.11, 95% CI: -1.75, -0.46) and disability (MD = -6.59, 95% CI: -10.65, -2.54). Subgroup analysis indicated greater effectiveness of short-term interventions (<6 weeks) in reducing pain and Oswestry disability index (ODI) vs long-term interventions (>6 weeks). mHealth interventions notably reduced pain and ODI scores vs unsupervised programs but showed no significant difference compared to in-person programs. The z-score line remained within TSA boundaries. mHealth interventions show potential in reducing pain and disability among patients with CLBP in LMICs, although with inconclusive impact on QoL. The high heterogeneity and limited number of studies underscore the need for further research with greater sample size to validate these findings and explore the long-term benefits and implementation challenges of mHealth in resource-constrained settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":52189,"journal":{"name":"Pain Reports","volume":"10 2","pages":"e1242"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11826050/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000001242","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a major global health issue, particularly severe in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where health care resources and accessibility are limited. Mobile health (mHealth) interventions offer a promising solution by leveraging technology to deliver health care services remotely. This review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of mHealth interventions in managing CLBP in LMICs. A comprehensive search of electronic databases was performed for studies published until June 2024, evaluating mHealth interventions for CLBP in LMICs. Primary outcomes measured were pain intensity and disability, while secondary outcomes included quality of life (QoL). Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (RoB2), and quality of evidence was evaluated using GRADE. Robustness of meta-analysis results was assessed via trial sequential analysis (TSA). Seven studies met the inclusion criteria. The mHealth interventions significantly reduced the overall pain intensity (MD = -1.11, 95% CI: -1.75, -0.46) and disability (MD = -6.59, 95% CI: -10.65, -2.54). Subgroup analysis indicated greater effectiveness of short-term interventions (<6 weeks) in reducing pain and Oswestry disability index (ODI) vs long-term interventions (>6 weeks). mHealth interventions notably reduced pain and ODI scores vs unsupervised programs but showed no significant difference compared to in-person programs. The z-score line remained within TSA boundaries. mHealth interventions show potential in reducing pain and disability among patients with CLBP in LMICs, although with inconclusive impact on QoL. The high heterogeneity and limited number of studies underscore the need for further research with greater sample size to validate these findings and explore the long-term benefits and implementation challenges of mHealth in resource-constrained settings.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
移动医疗干预在中低收入国家慢性腰痛保守治疗中的疗效:系统回顾、荟萃分析和试验序贯分析
慢性腰痛(CLBP)是一个主要的全球健康问题,在卫生保健资源和可及性有限的低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)尤为严重。移动医疗(mHealth)干预措施通过利用技术远程提供医疗保健服务,提供了一种很有前景的解决方案。本综述旨在评估移动健康干预在中低收入国家CLBP管理中的有效性。对电子数据库进行了全面搜索,以获取截至2024年6月发表的研究,评估中低收入国家CLBP的移动健康干预措施。测量的主要结果是疼痛强度和残疾,而次要结果包括生活质量(QoL)。使用Cochrane风险-偏倚工具(RoB2)评估偏倚风险,使用GRADE评估证据质量。通过试验序列分析(TSA)评估meta分析结果的稳健性。7项研究符合纳入标准。移动健康干预显著降低了总体疼痛强度(MD = -1.11, 95% CI: -1.75, -0.46)和残疾(MD = -6.59, 95% CI: -10.65, -2.54)。亚组分析显示短期干预(6周)更有效。与无人监督的项目相比,移动健康干预显著降低了疼痛和ODI评分,但与现场项目相比没有显著差异。z-score线保持在TSA的边界内。移动健康干预显示出在中低收入CLBP患者中减轻疼痛和残疾的潜力,尽管对生活质量的影响尚无定论。高度异质性和有限的研究数量强调需要进一步研究更大的样本量来验证这些发现,并探索移动医疗在资源受限环境下的长期效益和实施挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Reports
Pain Reports Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.10%
发文量
93
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Demographic patterns in quantitative sensory testing and clinical pain among former professional American-style football players. Psychological determinants and predictors of outcomes in spinal cord stimulation: a systematic review. Serum neurofilament light chain in fibromyalgia: comparative evidence of neuronal injury across chronic pain conditions. Acceptance of pain neuroscience education in chronic musculoskeletal pain conditions: qualitative systematic review. Cuff algometry induces large yet variable conditioned pain modulation effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1