An Analysis of National Institutes of Health-Funded Dissemination and Implementation Research in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

Amina Chtourou, Elise M Garton, Gila Neta
{"title":"An Analysis of National Institutes of Health-Funded Dissemination and Implementation Research in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.","authors":"Amina Chtourou, Elise M Garton, Gila Neta","doi":"10.1007/s43477-024-00138-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Implementation science can inform healthcare delivery to improve outcomes in resource-constrained settings through tailored strategies. The National Institutes of Health funds implementation science largely through its Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health program. We analyzed the program's grants with collaborators in low- and middle-income countries to understand trends and gaps in National Institutes of Health-funded global implementation science research. Query-View-Report was used to identify grants awarded between fiscal years 2013-2022 with at least one collaborating institution in a low- and middle-income country. Two coders reviewed the abstract and specific aims to determine the intervention being studied, setting, implementer, implementation outcomes, strategies, frameworks, and study design. From fiscal years 2013-2022, 81 grants had collaborating institutions across 25 low- and middle-income countries in five World Bank-defined regions, funded by 11 National Institutes of Health institutes and centers. Most grants focused on cancer (<i>n</i> = 12), other non-communicable diseases (<i>n</i> = 16), and tuberculosis (<i>n</i> = 12). Common implementation outcomes included costs (<i>n</i> = 43), fidelity (<i>n</i> = 38), maintenance (<i>n</i> = 36), and adoption (<i>n</i> = 35). Commonly studied implementation strategies included assess for readiness and identify barriers and facilitators (<i>n</i> = 18), revise professional roles (<i>n</i> = 17), and change service sites (<i>n</i> = 15). Frequently reported frameworks were RE-AIM (<i>n</i> = 30), CFIR (<i>n</i> = 22), and EPIS (<i>n</i> = 8). Most grants tested implementation strategies using experimental study designs (<i>n</i> = 52) in healthcare settings (<i>n</i> = 56). The National Institutes of Health funds a range of implementation science grants with collaborators in low- and middle-income countries. This analysis helps identify commonly utilized implementation outcomes, strategies, and frameworks and enables exploration of gaps and opportunities for further global research.</p>","PeriodicalId":73165,"journal":{"name":"Global implementation research and applications","volume":"5 1","pages":"82-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11821738/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global implementation research and applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43477-024-00138-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Implementation science can inform healthcare delivery to improve outcomes in resource-constrained settings through tailored strategies. The National Institutes of Health funds implementation science largely through its Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health program. We analyzed the program's grants with collaborators in low- and middle-income countries to understand trends and gaps in National Institutes of Health-funded global implementation science research. Query-View-Report was used to identify grants awarded between fiscal years 2013-2022 with at least one collaborating institution in a low- and middle-income country. Two coders reviewed the abstract and specific aims to determine the intervention being studied, setting, implementer, implementation outcomes, strategies, frameworks, and study design. From fiscal years 2013-2022, 81 grants had collaborating institutions across 25 low- and middle-income countries in five World Bank-defined regions, funded by 11 National Institutes of Health institutes and centers. Most grants focused on cancer (n = 12), other non-communicable diseases (n = 16), and tuberculosis (n = 12). Common implementation outcomes included costs (n = 43), fidelity (n = 38), maintenance (n = 36), and adoption (n = 35). Commonly studied implementation strategies included assess for readiness and identify barriers and facilitators (n = 18), revise professional roles (n = 17), and change service sites (n = 15). Frequently reported frameworks were RE-AIM (n = 30), CFIR (n = 22), and EPIS (n = 8). Most grants tested implementation strategies using experimental study designs (n = 52) in healthcare settings (n = 56). The National Institutes of Health funds a range of implementation science grants with collaborators in low- and middle-income countries. This analysis helps identify commonly utilized implementation outcomes, strategies, and frameworks and enables exploration of gaps and opportunities for further global research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Analysis of National Institutes of Health-Funded Dissemination and Implementation Research in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Blueprint for Enhancing Implementation Quality of Criança Feliz Program in Brazil: A Combined Program Impact Pathways-ERIC Approach. Implementing Cognitive Stimulation Therapy (CST) for Dementia in a Low-Resource Setting: A Case Study in Tanzania Exploring Barriers, Facilitators, and Recommendations for Practice. Conceptualisation of the SHIFT–SHARE: A New Strategic Healthcare Implementation Framework for Task Shifting, Sharing and Resource Enhancement Identifying and Prioritizing Factors to Improve Implementation of an Evidence-Based Program for Child Maltreatment Prevention in Rural Missouri Communities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1