František Trejtnar , Pavel Bárta , Ján Kozempel , Martin Vlk , Anna Ďurinová , Monika Kuchařová , Petr Pávek
{"title":"Terbium-161 in nuclear medicine: Preclinical and clinical progress in comparison with lutetium-177","authors":"František Trejtnar , Pavel Bárta , Ján Kozempel , Martin Vlk , Anna Ďurinová , Monika Kuchařová , Petr Pávek","doi":"10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2025.108998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The use of new radiopharmaceuticals labeled with lutetium-177 represents a successful translation of experimental results into clinical practice. Recent experimental data suggests that terbium-161 might well follow the example of lutetium-177 regarding applicability in nuclear medicine. Similarly to lutetium-177, the terbium-161 emits beta particles and gamma-radiation, although terbium-161 emits short-ranged conversion and Auger electrons, creating an effect that may eliminate smaller tumor metastases more effectively than lutetium-177. Terbium-161 may exert a higher radiobiological effect in the target tissues in comparison with lutetium-177, a difference which makes possible a reduction in the doses of radioactivity administered. Further, due to the similar chemical properties of lutetium-177 and terbium-161, similar radiolabeling techniques can be used. The differences found in preclinical experiments on radiotoxicity of the counterparts seem to be minor. Despite intensive progress, the number of preclinical studies on <sup>161</sup>Tb-labeled agents is still not comparable to studies on lutetium-177. Clinical trials with <sup>161</sup>Tb-labeled radiopharmaceuticals focused on the treatment of prostate cancer and selected neuroendocrine tumors have already begun, although none of them have been completed yet.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19363,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear medicine and biology","volume":"144 ","pages":"Article 108998"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear medicine and biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969805125000071","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The use of new radiopharmaceuticals labeled with lutetium-177 represents a successful translation of experimental results into clinical practice. Recent experimental data suggests that terbium-161 might well follow the example of lutetium-177 regarding applicability in nuclear medicine. Similarly to lutetium-177, the terbium-161 emits beta particles and gamma-radiation, although terbium-161 emits short-ranged conversion and Auger electrons, creating an effect that may eliminate smaller tumor metastases more effectively than lutetium-177. Terbium-161 may exert a higher radiobiological effect in the target tissues in comparison with lutetium-177, a difference which makes possible a reduction in the doses of radioactivity administered. Further, due to the similar chemical properties of lutetium-177 and terbium-161, similar radiolabeling techniques can be used. The differences found in preclinical experiments on radiotoxicity of the counterparts seem to be minor. Despite intensive progress, the number of preclinical studies on 161Tb-labeled agents is still not comparable to studies on lutetium-177. Clinical trials with 161Tb-labeled radiopharmaceuticals focused on the treatment of prostate cancer and selected neuroendocrine tumors have already begun, although none of them have been completed yet.
期刊介绍:
Nuclear Medicine and Biology publishes original research addressing all aspects of radiopharmaceutical science: synthesis, in vitro and ex vivo studies, in vivo biodistribution by dissection or imaging, radiopharmacology, radiopharmacy, and translational clinical studies of new targeted radiotracers. The importance of the target to an unmet clinical need should be the first consideration. If the synthesis of a new radiopharmaceutical is submitted without in vitro or in vivo data, then the uniqueness of the chemistry must be emphasized.
These multidisciplinary studies should validate the mechanism of localization whether the probe is based on binding to a receptor, enzyme, tumor antigen, or another well-defined target. The studies should be aimed at evaluating how the chemical and radiopharmaceutical properties affect pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, or therapeutic efficacy. Ideally, the study would address the sensitivity of the probe to changes in disease or treatment, although studies validating mechanism alone are acceptable. Radiopharmacy practice, addressing the issues of preparation, automation, quality control, dispensing, and regulations applicable to qualification and administration of radiopharmaceuticals to humans, is an important aspect of the developmental process, but only if the study has a significant impact on the field.
Contributions on the subject of therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals also are appropriate provided that the specificity of labeled compound localization and therapeutic effect have been addressed.