Density-dependent selection effect of dominant species rather than species diversity increased aboveground biomass accumulation in a temperate oak forest
Guanjie Wang , Liu Yang , Xiuchen Wu , Ting Wang , Hongyan Liu , Zhicheng Chen , Chenyi Yu , Shengyun Liu , Zhenjiang Li
{"title":"Density-dependent selection effect of dominant species rather than species diversity increased aboveground biomass accumulation in a temperate oak forest","authors":"Guanjie Wang , Liu Yang , Xiuchen Wu , Ting Wang , Hongyan Liu , Zhicheng Chen , Chenyi Yu , Shengyun Liu , Zhenjiang Li","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2025.122563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Forest aboveground biomass (AGB) exerts a critical role in mediating the global carbon cycle. The impacts of multiple abiotic and biotic factors on AGB have been extensively discussed, research on artificially assembled ecosystems has consistently shown that AGB is predominantly influenced by the prevalence of dominant species. However, it is unclear whether forest AGB is also regulated by the varying proportions of dominant species within a community. Based on nine relative density gradients (10 % - 90 %) of <em>Quercus aliena</em> var. <em>acutiserrata</em> populations, this study explored the spatial pattern in forest AGB and the underpinning drivers using generalized linear mixed models (GLMM) and structural equation modeling (SEM). Our results showed that as relative density of the dominant oak species increases, the community AGB, soil nutrients, intraspecific competition intensity and evolution diversity significantly increased, whereas tree species diversity, intraspecific and interspecific diameter at breast height (DBH) variation and interspecific competition intensity all significantly decreased. Soil nutrients could exert an important positive effect on forest AGB accumulation by mediating tree species diversity (Simpson index) and interspecific exclusion stress (interspecific DBH variation and competition intensity). Species diversity and interspecific DBH variation had negative impact whereas the interspecific competition intensity exerted positive contribution on forest AGB. We found that the density-dependent selection effect may be the fundamental cause of biodiversity loss and aboveground biomass accumulation, which highlights the significant influence of dominant species density on community development. Our study provides a valuable insight into the crucial role of dominant species populations in regional forest carbon sinks predication and forest ecosystem management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12350,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecology and Management","volume":"582 ","pages":"Article 122563"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecology and Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112725000714","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Forest aboveground biomass (AGB) exerts a critical role in mediating the global carbon cycle. The impacts of multiple abiotic and biotic factors on AGB have been extensively discussed, research on artificially assembled ecosystems has consistently shown that AGB is predominantly influenced by the prevalence of dominant species. However, it is unclear whether forest AGB is also regulated by the varying proportions of dominant species within a community. Based on nine relative density gradients (10 % - 90 %) of Quercus aliena var. acutiserrata populations, this study explored the spatial pattern in forest AGB and the underpinning drivers using generalized linear mixed models (GLMM) and structural equation modeling (SEM). Our results showed that as relative density of the dominant oak species increases, the community AGB, soil nutrients, intraspecific competition intensity and evolution diversity significantly increased, whereas tree species diversity, intraspecific and interspecific diameter at breast height (DBH) variation and interspecific competition intensity all significantly decreased. Soil nutrients could exert an important positive effect on forest AGB accumulation by mediating tree species diversity (Simpson index) and interspecific exclusion stress (interspecific DBH variation and competition intensity). Species diversity and interspecific DBH variation had negative impact whereas the interspecific competition intensity exerted positive contribution on forest AGB. We found that the density-dependent selection effect may be the fundamental cause of biodiversity loss and aboveground biomass accumulation, which highlights the significant influence of dominant species density on community development. Our study provides a valuable insight into the crucial role of dominant species populations in regional forest carbon sinks predication and forest ecosystem management.
期刊介绍:
Forest Ecology and Management publishes scientific articles linking forest ecology with forest management, focusing on the application of biological, ecological and social knowledge to the management and conservation of plantations and natural forests. The scope of the journal includes all forest ecosystems of the world.
A peer-review process ensures the quality and international interest of the manuscripts accepted for publication. The journal encourages communication between scientists in disparate fields who share a common interest in ecology and forest management, bridging the gap between research workers and forest managers.
We encourage submission of papers that will have the strongest interest and value to the Journal''s international readership. Some key features of papers with strong interest include:
1. Clear connections between the ecology and management of forests;
2. Novel ideas or approaches to important challenges in forest ecology and management;
3. Studies that address a population of interest beyond the scale of single research sites, Three key points in the design of forest experiments, Forest Ecology and Management 255 (2008) 2022-2023);
4. Review Articles on timely, important topics. Authors are welcome to contact one of the editors to discuss the suitability of a potential review manuscript.
The Journal encourages proposals for special issues examining important areas of forest ecology and management. Potential guest editors should contact any of the Editors to begin discussions about topics, potential papers, and other details.