Adel Shahnam , Alexander Davis , Lauren Julia Brown , Isaac Sullivan , Kevin Lin , Chien Ng , Nicholas Yeo , Benjamin Y. Kong , Trisha Khoo , Lydia Warburton , Inês Pires Da Silva , William Mullally , Wen Xu , Ken O’Byrne , Victoria Bray , Abhijit Pal , Antony Mersaides , Malinda Itchins , Surein Arulananda , Adnan Nagrial , Thomas John
{"title":"Real-World outcomes of Non-Small cell lung cancer patients harbouring KRAS G12C and KRAS G12D mutations","authors":"Adel Shahnam , Alexander Davis , Lauren Julia Brown , Isaac Sullivan , Kevin Lin , Chien Ng , Nicholas Yeo , Benjamin Y. Kong , Trisha Khoo , Lydia Warburton , Inês Pires Da Silva , William Mullally , Wen Xu , Ken O’Byrne , Victoria Bray , Abhijit Pal , Antony Mersaides , Malinda Itchins , Surein Arulananda , Adnan Nagrial , Thomas John","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div><em>KRAS G12D</em> and <em>G12C</em> mutations have distinct biological traits influencing treatment response. This study examines real-world demographics, clinical characteristics, and first-line treatment outcomes in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with these mutations.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective, multi-institution observational study used data from the AURORA database. Patients aged 18 years or older, diagnosed with metastatic <em>KRAS G12D</em> or <em>G12C</em> NSCLC between January 1, 2010, and April 30, 2024, were included. Descriptive statistics compared patient characteristics, and time-to-event outcomes were assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 298 (216 <em>KRAS G12C</em> and 82 <em>KRAS G12D</em>) patients were included. The <em>KRAS G12D</em> group had a higher proportion of never smokers (15 % vs. 1 %, p < 0.01) and PD-L1 < 1 % (36 % vs. 21 %, p = 0.06). No significant differences were observed in overall survival (OS) (HR 1.09, 95 % CI 0.80–1.48, p = 0.60) or real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) (HR 1.21, 95 % CI 0.92–1.59, p = 0.18) between mutation groups. In <em>KRAS G12C</em>, monotherapy immunotherapy (HR 0.61, 95 % CI 0.39–0.97, p = 0.04) and chemo-immunotherapy (HR 0.59, 95 % CI 0.37–0.94, p = 0.03) improved OS compared to chemotherapy. For <em>KRAS G12D</em>, neither immunotherapy (HR 0.74, 95 % CI 0.29–1.89, p = 0.53) nor chemo-immunotherapy (HR 0.73, 95 % CI 0.34–1.57, p = 0.42) improved OS compared to chemotherapy alone.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div><em>KRAS G12C</em> and <em>G12D</em> mutations demonstrate distinct clinical characteristics and treatment responses, with poorer immunotherapy outcomes in <em>KRAS G12D</em> patients. Prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":"201 ","pages":"Article 108421"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lung Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016950022500042X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
KRAS G12D and G12C mutations have distinct biological traits influencing treatment response. This study examines real-world demographics, clinical characteristics, and first-line treatment outcomes in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with these mutations.
Methods
This retrospective, multi-institution observational study used data from the AURORA database. Patients aged 18 years or older, diagnosed with metastatic KRAS G12D or G12C NSCLC between January 1, 2010, and April 30, 2024, were included. Descriptive statistics compared patient characteristics, and time-to-event outcomes were assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression.
Results
A total of 298 (216 KRAS G12C and 82 KRAS G12D) patients were included. The KRAS G12D group had a higher proportion of never smokers (15 % vs. 1 %, p < 0.01) and PD-L1 < 1 % (36 % vs. 21 %, p = 0.06). No significant differences were observed in overall survival (OS) (HR 1.09, 95 % CI 0.80–1.48, p = 0.60) or real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) (HR 1.21, 95 % CI 0.92–1.59, p = 0.18) between mutation groups. In KRAS G12C, monotherapy immunotherapy (HR 0.61, 95 % CI 0.39–0.97, p = 0.04) and chemo-immunotherapy (HR 0.59, 95 % CI 0.37–0.94, p = 0.03) improved OS compared to chemotherapy. For KRAS G12D, neither immunotherapy (HR 0.74, 95 % CI 0.29–1.89, p = 0.53) nor chemo-immunotherapy (HR 0.73, 95 % CI 0.34–1.57, p = 0.42) improved OS compared to chemotherapy alone.
Conclusion
KRAS G12C and G12D mutations demonstrate distinct clinical characteristics and treatment responses, with poorer immunotherapy outcomes in KRAS G12D patients. Prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.
kras G12D和G12C突变具有影响治疗反应的不同生物学特性。本研究探讨了具有这些突变的转移性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的真实世界人口统计学、临床特征和一线治疗结果。方法:这项回顾性、多机构观察性研究使用来自AURORA数据库的数据。在2010年1月1日至2024年4月30日期间,年龄在18岁或以上,被诊断为转移性KRAS G12D或G12C NSCLC的患者被纳入研究。描述性统计比较患者特征,并使用Cox比例风险回归评估事件发生时间。结果共纳入298例患者,其中KRAS G12C 216例,KRAS G12D 82例。KRAS G12D组从不吸烟的比例更高(15% vs. 1%, p <;0.01), PD-L1 <;1% (36% vs. 21%, p = 0.06)。突变组之间的总生存期(OS) (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.80-1.48, p = 0.60)或真实世界无进展生存期(rwPFS) (HR 1.21, 95% CI 0.92-1.59, p = 0.18)无显著差异。KRAS G12C中,与化疗相比,单药免疫治疗(HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.39-0.97, p = 0.04)和化疗免疫治疗(HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.37-0.94, p = 0.03)改善了OS。对于KRAS G12D,与单独化疗相比,免疫治疗(HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.29-1.89, p = 0.53)和化疗免疫治疗(HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.34-1.57, p = 0.42)均未改善OS。结论KRAS G12C和G12D突变具有不同的临床特征和治疗反应,KRAS G12D患者的免疫治疗效果较差。需要前瞻性研究来验证这些发现。
期刊介绍:
Lung Cancer is an international publication covering the clinical, translational and basic science of malignancies of the lung and chest region.Original research articles, early reports, review articles, editorials and correspondence covering the prevention, epidemiology and etiology, basic biology, pathology, clinical assessment, surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, combined treatment modalities, other treatment modalities and outcomes of lung cancer are welcome.