Clinical Outcome and Predictors of Customized Polyetheretherketone Post-and-Cores for Residual Root and Crown: A Retrospective Study

IF 2.2 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Clinical and Experimental Dental Research Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1002/cre2.70066
Xin Wang, Chen Liu, Yuchen Liu, Dan Ma, Ruifang Ren, Mingxing Zhang, Jiawen Guo, Yimin Zhao, Dongmei Li, Shizhu Bai
{"title":"Clinical Outcome and Predictors of Customized Polyetheretherketone Post-and-Cores for Residual Root and Crown: A Retrospective Study","authors":"Xin Wang,&nbsp;Chen Liu,&nbsp;Yuchen Liu,&nbsp;Dan Ma,&nbsp;Ruifang Ren,&nbsp;Mingxing Zhang,&nbsp;Jiawen Guo,&nbsp;Yimin Zhao,&nbsp;Dongmei Li,&nbsp;Shizhu Bai","doi":"10.1002/cre2.70066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This retrospective, non-interventional study aimed to evaluate the longevity and factors influencing the success of custom-fabricated polyetheretherketone (PEEK) post-and-cores in endodontically treated teeth (ETT).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Material and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>During the observation period (2019–2022), 63 patients received 100 customized PEEK post-and-cores. Clinical outcomes were analyzed based on the following parameters: age, gender, tooth type, tooth position, proximal contacts, remaining cavity walls, antagonist contacts, and final restoration. Kaplan–Meier analysis was used for the survival probability. Log-rank tests were used to identify univariate associations between failure rates and other potential factors. Cox regression was used to assess the risk of failure and determine possible risks between the identified factors at a cut-off point <i>p</i>-value (0.25 in univariate analysis).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The median follow-up duration was 20.62 months, with a maximum of 40.57 months. 93 restorations were judged as successful and 99 teeth survived. The main failure type was decementation of the restoration (<i>n</i> = 4). The annual failure rate was 3.4%. Gender, remaining tooth structure, and final restoration were found to be correlated with success rates in the preliminary univariate analysis (Log-rank tests) to determine the association between failure rates and potential factors. Multifactorial survival analysis (Cox regression) showed that teeth with coronal walls had a significantly lower failure risk than deprived teeth, even with the ferrule effect. (HR = 0.04; 95% CI for HR = 0.01–0.29; <i>p</i> = 0.002).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>PEEK post-and-cores adapt well to clinical restorative needs and offer favorable short-term clinical outcomes. The remaining cavity wall was a significant success rate predictor.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10203,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Dental Research","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cre2.70066","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Dental Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cre2.70066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

This retrospective, non-interventional study aimed to evaluate the longevity and factors influencing the success of custom-fabricated polyetheretherketone (PEEK) post-and-cores in endodontically treated teeth (ETT).

Material and Methods

During the observation period (2019–2022), 63 patients received 100 customized PEEK post-and-cores. Clinical outcomes were analyzed based on the following parameters: age, gender, tooth type, tooth position, proximal contacts, remaining cavity walls, antagonist contacts, and final restoration. Kaplan–Meier analysis was used for the survival probability. Log-rank tests were used to identify univariate associations between failure rates and other potential factors. Cox regression was used to assess the risk of failure and determine possible risks between the identified factors at a cut-off point p-value (0.25 in univariate analysis).

Results

The median follow-up duration was 20.62 months, with a maximum of 40.57 months. 93 restorations were judged as successful and 99 teeth survived. The main failure type was decementation of the restoration (n = 4). The annual failure rate was 3.4%. Gender, remaining tooth structure, and final restoration were found to be correlated with success rates in the preliminary univariate analysis (Log-rank tests) to determine the association between failure rates and potential factors. Multifactorial survival analysis (Cox regression) showed that teeth with coronal walls had a significantly lower failure risk than deprived teeth, even with the ferrule effect. (HR = 0.04; 95% CI for HR = 0.01–0.29; p = 0.002).

Conclusions

PEEK post-and-cores adapt well to clinical restorative needs and offer favorable short-term clinical outcomes. The remaining cavity wall was a significant success rate predictor.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
定制聚醚醚酮桩核治疗残根残冠的临床结果及预测因素:一项回顾性研究
目的:回顾性、非干预性研究,探讨定制聚醚醚酮(PEEK)桩核在根管治疗牙(ETT)中的使用寿命及其影响因素。材料与方法在观察期内(2019-2022年),63例患者接受了100例定制PEEK桩核。临床结果根据以下参数进行分析:年龄、性别、牙型、牙位、近端接触、剩余腔壁、拮抗剂接触和最终修复。生存率采用Kaplan-Meier分析。Log-rank检验用于确定故障率与其他潜在因素之间的单变量关联。采用Cox回归评估失败风险,并在截断点p值(单变量分析为0.25)确定确定因素之间可能存在的风险。结果中位随访时间为20.62个月,最长40.57个月。93颗牙修复成功,99颗牙存活。主要失效类型为退化恢复(n = 4)。年失败率为3.4%。在初步的单变量分析(Log-rank检验)中,发现性别、剩余牙齿结构和最终修复与失败率相关,以确定失败率与潜在因素之间的关系。多因素生存分析(Cox回归)显示,即使有卡箍效应,有冠状壁的牙齿的失效风险也明显低于无冠状壁的牙齿。(hr = 0.04;95% CI HR = 0.01-0.29;p = 0.002)。结论PEEK桩核能很好地适应临床修复需要,短期临床效果良好。剩余的腔壁是一个显著的成功率预测指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Experimental Dental Research
Clinical and Experimental Dental Research DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
165
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Dental Research aims to provide open access peer-reviewed publications of high scientific quality representing original clinical, diagnostic or experimental work within all disciplines and fields of oral medicine and dentistry. The scope of Clinical and Experimental Dental Research comprises original research material on the anatomy, physiology and pathology of oro-facial, oro-pharyngeal and maxillofacial tissues, and functions and dysfunctions within the stomatognathic system, and the epidemiology, aetiology, prevention, diagnosis, prognosis and therapy of diseases and conditions that have an effect on the homeostasis of the mouth, jaws, and closely associated structures, as well as the healing and regeneration and the clinical aspects of replacement of hard and soft tissues with biomaterials, and the rehabilitation of stomatognathic functions. Studies that bring new knowledge on how to advance health on the individual or public health levels, including interactions between oral and general health and ill-health are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Postoperative Pain Frequency in Single-Session Endodontic Treatments With Patency and Foraminal Enlargement. A Cross-Sectional Survey of Orthodontic Retention Practices and Opinions Among General Dental Practitioners in Australia. Improving Oral Health After Spinal Cord Injury: A Scoping Review of Barriers, Facilitators, Current Interventions and Their Effectiveness. Effect of Different Sodium Hypochlorite Concentrations on Post Endodontic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Quantification of Removable Prosthesis Plaque Area Coverage Among Adult Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1