Gender-Specific Effects on Quality of Life and Physical Activity After Pulmonary Vein Isolation: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of interventional cardiology Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1155/joic/3825972
Daniel Meretz, Martin Seifert, Anja Haase-Fielitz, Christian Georgi, Marwin Bannehr, Viviane Moeller, Hans-Heinrich Minden, Dirk Große Meininghaus, Gerhard Janßen, Christian Butter
{"title":"Gender-Specific Effects on Quality of Life and Physical Activity After Pulmonary Vein Isolation: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"Daniel Meretz,&nbsp;Martin Seifert,&nbsp;Anja Haase-Fielitz,&nbsp;Christian Georgi,&nbsp;Marwin Bannehr,&nbsp;Viviane Moeller,&nbsp;Hans-Heinrich Minden,&nbsp;Dirk Große Meininghaus,&nbsp;Gerhard Janßen,&nbsp;Christian Butter","doi":"10.1155/joic/3825972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Background:</b> Gender differences exist in atrial fibrillation (AF) regarding epidemiology, mechanisms, management, and outcomes. There are limited data regarding gender-specific outcomes after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) including AF recurrence, physical activity, and health-related quality of life.</p>\n <p><b>Methods:</b> In this secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial (BE-ACTION study: investigating 200 patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF undergoing PVI), a gender-specific analysis of the primary endpoint (recurrence of atrial arrhythmia &gt; 30s, additional ablation procedure, or new onset of antiarrhythmic drugs) was performed. Quality of life was assessed using the AFEQT and SF-36 questionnaires, while physical activity was measured via step counts recorded at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. The Mann–Whitney <i>U</i> test and Fisher exact test were used to compare continuous and categorical variables, respectively.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> 33.5% were women. Women and men were comparable in demographics, comorbidities, and steps per day before and after PVI. There was no statistically significant difference in the primary composite endpoint between women (37.3%) and men (25.6%) (<i>p</i> = 0.085). Before PVI, women had lower quality of life scores than men (median AFEQT scores: 43.5 points [25<sup>th</sup> to 75<sup>th</sup> percentiles 25.9–63.9] vs. 62.0 points [47.2–76.4], respectively, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) as well as in the physical (40.22 points [33.98–46.69] vs. 46.30 points [39.21–51.60], <i>p</i> = 0.002) and mental domains (42.33 points [27.34–51.59] vs. 49.59 points [36.02–55.64], <i>p</i> = 0.001) of the SF-36 questionnaire. The overall improvement in the quality of life was significant for both men and women (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Using AFEQT, women exhibited lower quality of life scores compared to men at 6 months post-PVI (<i>p</i> = 0.001); however, this difference was no longer statistically significant at 12 months (<i>p</i> = 0.077).</p>\n <p><b>Conclusion:</b> These data emphasize the importance of AF recurrence after PVI and motivate future research to explore the causes and clinical consequences of a gender gap in quality of life in women after PVI.</p>\n <p><b>Trial Registration:</b> BE-ACTION Study ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: DRKS00012914</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional cardiology","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/joic/3825972","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of interventional cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/joic/3825972","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Gender differences exist in atrial fibrillation (AF) regarding epidemiology, mechanisms, management, and outcomes. There are limited data regarding gender-specific outcomes after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) including AF recurrence, physical activity, and health-related quality of life.

Methods: In this secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial (BE-ACTION study: investigating 200 patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF undergoing PVI), a gender-specific analysis of the primary endpoint (recurrence of atrial arrhythmia > 30s, additional ablation procedure, or new onset of antiarrhythmic drugs) was performed. Quality of life was assessed using the AFEQT and SF-36 questionnaires, while physical activity was measured via step counts recorded at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. The Mann–Whitney U test and Fisher exact test were used to compare continuous and categorical variables, respectively.

Results: 33.5% were women. Women and men were comparable in demographics, comorbidities, and steps per day before and after PVI. There was no statistically significant difference in the primary composite endpoint between women (37.3%) and men (25.6%) (p = 0.085). Before PVI, women had lower quality of life scores than men (median AFEQT scores: 43.5 points [25th to 75th percentiles 25.9–63.9] vs. 62.0 points [47.2–76.4], respectively, p < 0.001) as well as in the physical (40.22 points [33.98–46.69] vs. 46.30 points [39.21–51.60], p = 0.002) and mental domains (42.33 points [27.34–51.59] vs. 49.59 points [36.02–55.64], p = 0.001) of the SF-36 questionnaire. The overall improvement in the quality of life was significant for both men and women (p < 0.001). Using AFEQT, women exhibited lower quality of life scores compared to men at 6 months post-PVI (p = 0.001); however, this difference was no longer statistically significant at 12 months (p = 0.077).

Conclusion: These data emphasize the importance of AF recurrence after PVI and motivate future research to explore the causes and clinical consequences of a gender gap in quality of life in women after PVI.

Trial Registration: BE-ACTION Study ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: DRKS00012914

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肺静脉隔离术后不同性别对生活质量和体育锻炼的影响:随机对照试验的二次分析
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of interventional cardiology
Journal of interventional cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Interventional Cardiology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for cardiologists determined to stay current in the diagnosis, investigation, and management of patients with cardiovascular disease and its associated complications. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies focusing on new procedures and techniques in all major subject areas in the field, including: Acute coronary syndrome Coronary disease Congenital heart diseases Myocardial infarction Peripheral arterial disease Valvular heart disease Cardiac hemodynamics and physiology Haemostasis and thrombosis
期刊最新文献
Unveiling the Value of Contrast Transthoracic Echocardiography Over Enhanced Transcranial Doppler for Right-to-Left Shunt Diagnosis During Synchronous Provocation Testing A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Elastic Compressive Dressing and the TR Band After Transradial Coronary Intervention Gender-Specific Effects on Quality of Life and Physical Activity After Pulmonary Vein Isolation: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial Spanish Registry of Pressure-Controlled Intermittent Coronary Sinus Occlusion (PiCSO) Balloon: Initial Experience and Short-Term Clinical Outcomes Corrigendum to “The “L-Sandwich” Strategy for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Randomized Clinical Trial”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1