Comparative Analysis of the Gas Extraction Effects With Different Numbers and Spacings of Boreholes Drilled Along a Coal Seam

IF 3.4 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS Energy Science & Engineering Pub Date : 2025-01-05 DOI:10.1002/ese3.2050
Yuexia Chen, Tingxiang Chu, Xuexi Chen, Peng Chen, Haidong Wang, Boning Jiang, Jialin Cao
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of the Gas Extraction Effects With Different Numbers and Spacings of Boreholes Drilled Along a Coal Seam","authors":"Yuexia Chen,&nbsp;Tingxiang Chu,&nbsp;Xuexi Chen,&nbsp;Peng Chen,&nbsp;Haidong Wang,&nbsp;Boning Jiang,&nbsp;Jialin Cao","doi":"10.1002/ese3.2050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The number and spacing of boreholes drilled along a coal seam are important parameters of the borehole layout. Despite the previous extensive research by many experts, quantitative and visual comparisons of the gas extraction effects with different borehole spacings and numbers are rare. Here, the effective gas extraction range, delimited by the 0.74 MPa isobaric surface and lines, was simulated. The 0.74 MPa isobaric surface around multiple sets of boreholes at 60 days of gas extraction is wavy. At 50 days, the isobaric lines around a single set of boreholes are approximately circular, whereas those around multiple sets of boreholes are approximately elliptical. When five sets of boreholes are used, the short semiaxis of the elliptical contour around the middle borehole is approximately 59% greater than the effective extraction radius of a single borehole. Among the spacings investigated, the effective extraction volume V5 peaks at a borehole spacing of 5 m at 90 days; but, the isobaric lines at the top and bottom of the working face are concave inwards, that is, certain gas pressures exceed 0.74 MPa, thereby increasing the likelihood of gas emissions. Thus, at 90 days, the efficiency of gas extraction in this studied working face is higher as the borehole spacing is 4 m. This approach, which takes into account the superimposed effect of boreholes drilled along a coal seam, the radius of gas extraction, isolines, isobaric surface and the effective extraction volume, offers theoretical guidance for the arrangement of boreholes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11673,"journal":{"name":"Energy Science & Engineering","volume":"13 2","pages":"944-954"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ese3.2050","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Science & Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.2050","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The number and spacing of boreholes drilled along a coal seam are important parameters of the borehole layout. Despite the previous extensive research by many experts, quantitative and visual comparisons of the gas extraction effects with different borehole spacings and numbers are rare. Here, the effective gas extraction range, delimited by the 0.74 MPa isobaric surface and lines, was simulated. The 0.74 MPa isobaric surface around multiple sets of boreholes at 60 days of gas extraction is wavy. At 50 days, the isobaric lines around a single set of boreholes are approximately circular, whereas those around multiple sets of boreholes are approximately elliptical. When five sets of boreholes are used, the short semiaxis of the elliptical contour around the middle borehole is approximately 59% greater than the effective extraction radius of a single borehole. Among the spacings investigated, the effective extraction volume V5 peaks at a borehole spacing of 5 m at 90 days; but, the isobaric lines at the top and bottom of the working face are concave inwards, that is, certain gas pressures exceed 0.74 MPa, thereby increasing the likelihood of gas emissions. Thus, at 90 days, the efficiency of gas extraction in this studied working face is higher as the borehole spacing is 4 m. This approach, which takes into account the superimposed effect of boreholes drilled along a coal seam, the radius of gas extraction, isolines, isobaric surface and the effective extraction volume, offers theoretical guidance for the arrangement of boreholes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
沿煤层钻探不同数量和间距钻孔的瓦斯抽采效果对比分析
沿煤层钻孔的数量和间距是钻孔布置的重要参数。尽管许多专家之前进行了广泛的研究,但对不同井眼间距和井眼数量的天然气开采效果进行定量和可视化比较的情况很少。模拟了以0.74 MPa等压面和线为界的有效瓦斯抽采范围。在60天的天然气开采过程中,多套井眼周围0.74 MPa等压面呈波浪状。50天时,单套井眼周围的等压线近似为圆形,而多套井眼周围的等压线近似为椭圆形。当使用5组井眼时,中间井眼周围椭圆轮廓的短半轴比单个井眼的有效提取半径大约59%。在研究的井距中,有效采收率V5在井距为5 m时达到峰值,为90 d;但工作面顶部和底部等压线向内凹,即某些气体压力超过0.74 MPa,从而增加了气体排放的可能性。因此,在90天时,当钻孔间距为4 m时,该工作面瓦斯抽采效率更高。该方法考虑了沿煤层钻孔的叠加效应、瓦斯抽采半径、等值线、等压面和有效抽采体积等因素,为钻孔布置提供了理论指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Science & Engineering
Energy Science & Engineering Engineering-Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
7.90%
发文量
298
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy Science & Engineering is a peer reviewed, open access journal dedicated to fundamental and applied research on energy and supply and use. Published as a co-operative venture of Wiley and SCI (Society of Chemical Industry), the journal offers authors a fast route to publication and the ability to share their research with the widest possible audience of scientists, professionals and other interested people across the globe. Securing an affordable and low carbon energy supply is a critical challenge of the 21st century and the solutions will require collaboration between scientists and engineers worldwide. This new journal aims to facilitate collaboration and spark innovation in energy research and development. Due to the importance of this topic to society and economic development the journal will give priority to quality research papers that are accessible to a broad readership and discuss sustainable, state-of-the art approaches to shaping the future of energy. This multidisciplinary journal will appeal to all researchers and professionals working in any area of energy in academia, industry or government, including scientists, engineers, consultants, policy-makers, government officials, economists and corporate organisations.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Quantifying Public Perceptions of Hydrogen Adoption in the United Kingdom Incorporating Challenges, Acceptance Factors and Proposed Strategies Issue Information Microscopic Pore Structure Characteristics and Genesis of Low Resistivity Reservoirs: A Case Study of the Wufeng and Longmaxi Formations in the Changning Area, Sichuan Basin Research Progress on Demulsification Technology and Mechanism for Oilfield Crude Oil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1