Current quantitative methodologies for pre-implantation genetic testing frequently misclassify meiotic aneuploidies as mosaic.

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Fertility and sterility Pub Date : 2025-02-15 DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2025.02.018
Teodora Popa, Colin Davis, Leoni Xanthopoulou, Evangelia Bakosi, Chloe He, Helen O'Neill, Christian Ottolini
{"title":"Current quantitative methodologies for pre-implantation genetic testing frequently misclassify meiotic aneuploidies as mosaic.","authors":"Teodora Popa, Colin Davis, Leoni Xanthopoulou, Evangelia Bakosi, Chloe He, Helen O'Neill, Christian Ottolini","doi":"10.1016/j.fertnstert.2025.02.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To study the biological origin of chromosomal abnormalities in embryos reported as mosaic following next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) and to assess the accuracy of current NGS-based methods in distinguishing meiotic from mitotic errors.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study utilizing single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping and Karyomapping to identify meiotic aneuploidy in clinically reported mosaic embryos.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>A total of 146 embryos from 87 patients who underwent IVF cycles with NGS-based PGT-A between 2018 and 2020 at The Evewell, London, UK.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Embryos underwent clinical NGS-based PGT-A to identify chromosomal abnormalities. Haplotype-based methods such as SNP-based genotyping and Karyomapping were performed on the same amplified material used for NGS-based PGT-A to determine the origin of the chromosomal errors.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The proportion of embryos reported as mosaic by NGS that contained meiotic errors, and the distribution of meiotic versus mitotic origin among chromosomal abnormalities identified in the mosaic range.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 141 embryos identified as mosaic following NGS-based PGT-A, 32.6% (n=46/141) contained an error of meiotic origin, challenging their classification as 'mosaic embryos'. In total, 191 individual chromosomal errors were reported in the mosaic range by NGS-based PGT-A. Of those, 29.3% (56/191) errors (both below and above the 50% copy number threshold) were found to be of meiotic origin. The majority (94.6%) of meiotic errors were maternal in origin. Embryos with multiple chromosomal abnormalities were significantly more likely to have at least one meiotic error. Higher intermediate copy number values correlated with an increased probability of an error being of meiotic origin.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study presents the first direct evidence that a third of embryos reported as mosaic (both low- and high-level mosaic) by NGS-based PGT-A contain meiotic errors, highlighting the potential misclassification of aneuploid embryos as mosaic by current NGS-based PGT-A methods which cannot accurately distinguishing between meiotic and mitotic errors. SNP genotyping provides essential information for accurately determining the origin of chromosomal abnormalities and should be integrated with NGS-based copy number analysis to enhance diagnostic accuracy. Further studies are needed to refine mosaicism classification and to better understand its true implications in IVF treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":12275,"journal":{"name":"Fertility and sterility","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fertility and sterility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2025.02.018","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To study the biological origin of chromosomal abnormalities in embryos reported as mosaic following next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) and to assess the accuracy of current NGS-based methods in distinguishing meiotic from mitotic errors.

Design: Retrospective cohort study utilizing single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping and Karyomapping to identify meiotic aneuploidy in clinically reported mosaic embryos.

Subjects: A total of 146 embryos from 87 patients who underwent IVF cycles with NGS-based PGT-A between 2018 and 2020 at The Evewell, London, UK.

Exposure: Embryos underwent clinical NGS-based PGT-A to identify chromosomal abnormalities. Haplotype-based methods such as SNP-based genotyping and Karyomapping were performed on the same amplified material used for NGS-based PGT-A to determine the origin of the chromosomal errors.

Main outcome measures: The proportion of embryos reported as mosaic by NGS that contained meiotic errors, and the distribution of meiotic versus mitotic origin among chromosomal abnormalities identified in the mosaic range.

Results: Of the 141 embryos identified as mosaic following NGS-based PGT-A, 32.6% (n=46/141) contained an error of meiotic origin, challenging their classification as 'mosaic embryos'. In total, 191 individual chromosomal errors were reported in the mosaic range by NGS-based PGT-A. Of those, 29.3% (56/191) errors (both below and above the 50% copy number threshold) were found to be of meiotic origin. The majority (94.6%) of meiotic errors were maternal in origin. Embryos with multiple chromosomal abnormalities were significantly more likely to have at least one meiotic error. Higher intermediate copy number values correlated with an increased probability of an error being of meiotic origin.

Conclusion: This study presents the first direct evidence that a third of embryos reported as mosaic (both low- and high-level mosaic) by NGS-based PGT-A contain meiotic errors, highlighting the potential misclassification of aneuploid embryos as mosaic by current NGS-based PGT-A methods which cannot accurately distinguishing between meiotic and mitotic errors. SNP genotyping provides essential information for accurately determining the origin of chromosomal abnormalities and should be integrated with NGS-based copy number analysis to enhance diagnostic accuracy. Further studies are needed to refine mosaicism classification and to better understand its true implications in IVF treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Fertility and sterility
Fertility and sterility 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
6.00%
发文量
1446
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: Fertility and Sterility® is an international journal for obstetricians, gynecologists, reproductive endocrinologists, urologists, basic scientists and others who treat and investigate problems of infertility and human reproductive disorders. The journal publishes juried original scientific articles in clinical and laboratory research relevant to reproductive endocrinology, urology, andrology, physiology, immunology, genetics, contraception, and menopause. Fertility and Sterility® encourages and supports meaningful basic and clinical research, and facilitates and promotes excellence in professional education, in the field of reproductive medicine.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Table of Contents Retraction notice to ‘Myo-inositol may improve oocyte quality in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. A prospective, controlled, randomized trial’ [Fertility and Sterility 91 (2009) 1750-1754] Current quantitative methodologies for pre-implantation genetic testing frequently misclassify meiotic aneuploidies as mosaic. Standardization of Back-Table Technique for Uterus Transplantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1