Prognostic impact of tumor size on cancer-specific survival for postoperative WHO grade II oligodendroglioma: a SEER-based study.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Frontiers in Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-03 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2025.1455567
Qin Lu, Yongyan Wu, Yonglin Xie, Shuxu Yang, Hongchuan Jin
{"title":"Prognostic impact of tumor size on cancer-specific survival for postoperative WHO grade II oligodendroglioma: a SEER-based study.","authors":"Qin Lu, Yongyan Wu, Yonglin Xie, Shuxu Yang, Hongchuan Jin","doi":"10.3389/fsurg.2025.1455567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>WHO grade II oligodendroglioma (OG/II) is a rare primary brain tumor with various outcomes. Our study aims to investigate prognostic factors for postoperative OG/II patients and then evaluate the instructional value of tumor size.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively studied the cases from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to identify and assess prognostic factors. The optimal cut-off value of tumor size was determined by X-tile analysis and verified by multivariate analyses. Subsequently, Subgroup analyses were performed based on tumor size.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>676 OG/II patients were enrolled in our study. Multivariate Cox analyses revealed that age > 60 (HR 3.52), male (HR 1.48), total resection (HR 0.38), and tumor size (HR 2.04) were independent factors in predicting cancer-specific survival (CCS). The optimal cut-off value for tumor size was 60 mm. Patients with tumor size less than 60 mm, age > 60 (HR 3.82), and radiation (HR 1.58) were associated with worse CSS, while total resection (HR 0.35) was associated with better CSS. Lastly, a tumor size-based nomogram was established objectively and accurately.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study identified four crucial prognostic factors related to CSS in postoperative OG/II patients: age, sex, the extent of recession, and tumor size. A tumor size of 60 mm was an optimal cut-off point for dividing patients into low and high-risk groups. Patients in the low-risk group may not benefit from extended resection and radiation. Tumor size can be a valuable factor for making therapeutic schedules.</p>","PeriodicalId":12564,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Surgery","volume":"12 ","pages":"1455567"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11830688/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2025.1455567","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: WHO grade II oligodendroglioma (OG/II) is a rare primary brain tumor with various outcomes. Our study aims to investigate prognostic factors for postoperative OG/II patients and then evaluate the instructional value of tumor size.

Methods: We retrospectively studied the cases from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to identify and assess prognostic factors. The optimal cut-off value of tumor size was determined by X-tile analysis and verified by multivariate analyses. Subsequently, Subgroup analyses were performed based on tumor size.

Result: 676 OG/II patients were enrolled in our study. Multivariate Cox analyses revealed that age > 60 (HR 3.52), male (HR 1.48), total resection (HR 0.38), and tumor size (HR 2.04) were independent factors in predicting cancer-specific survival (CCS). The optimal cut-off value for tumor size was 60 mm. Patients with tumor size less than 60 mm, age > 60 (HR 3.82), and radiation (HR 1.58) were associated with worse CSS, while total resection (HR 0.35) was associated with better CSS. Lastly, a tumor size-based nomogram was established objectively and accurately.

Conclusion: Our study identified four crucial prognostic factors related to CSS in postoperative OG/II patients: age, sex, the extent of recession, and tumor size. A tumor size of 60 mm was an optimal cut-off point for dividing patients into low and high-risk groups. Patients in the low-risk group may not benefit from extended resection and radiation. Tumor size can be a valuable factor for making therapeutic schedules.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肿瘤大小对术后WHO II级少突胶质细胞瘤癌症特异性生存的预后影响:一项基于seer的研究
背景:WHO II级少突胶质细胞瘤(OG/II)是一种罕见的原发性脑肿瘤,其预后多种多样。本研究旨在探讨影响OG/II术后患者预后的因素,并评价肿瘤大小的指导价值。方法:我们回顾性研究来自监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库的病例。采用单因素和多因素Cox分析和Kaplan-Meier生存曲线来识别和评估预后因素。肿瘤大小的最佳临界值通过X-tile分析确定,并通过多变量分析进行验证。随后,根据肿瘤大小进行亚组分析。结果:676例OG/II患者纳入我们的研究。多因素Cox分析显示,年龄60岁(HR 3.52)、男性(HR 1.48)、全切除(HR 0.38)和肿瘤大小(HR 2.04)是预测癌症特异性生存(CCS)的独立因素。肿瘤大小的最佳临界值为60mm。肿瘤大小小于60 mm、年龄小于60岁(HR 3.82)和放疗(HR 1.58)的患者与较差的CSS相关,而完全切除(HR 0.35)与较好的CSS相关。最后,客观准确地建立了基于肿瘤大小的形态图。结论:我们的研究确定了与OG/II术后患者CSS相关的四个关键预后因素:年龄、性别、消退程度和肿瘤大小。肿瘤大小为60mm是将患者分为低危组和高危组的最佳分界点。低危组患者可能无法从扩大切除和放疗中获益。肿瘤大小是制定治疗计划的重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Surgery
Frontiers in Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
1872
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Evidence of surgical interventions go back to prehistoric times. Since then, the field of surgery has developed into a complex array of specialties and procedures, particularly with the advent of microsurgery, lasers and minimally invasive techniques. The advanced skills now required from surgeons has led to ever increasing specialization, though these still share important fundamental principles. Frontiers in Surgery is the umbrella journal representing the publication interests of all surgical specialties. It is divided into several “Specialty Sections” listed below. All these sections have their own Specialty Chief Editor, Editorial Board and homepage, but all articles carry the citation Frontiers in Surgery. Frontiers in Surgery calls upon medical professionals and scientists from all surgical specialties to publish their experimental and clinical studies in this journal. By assembling all surgical specialties, which nonetheless retain their independence, under the common umbrella of Frontiers in Surgery, a powerful publication venue is created. Since there is often overlap and common ground between the different surgical specialties, assembly of all surgical disciplines into a single journal will foster a collaborative dialogue amongst the surgical community. This means that publications, which are also of interest to other surgical specialties, will reach a wider audience and have greater impact. The aim of this multidisciplinary journal is to create a discussion and knowledge platform of advances and research findings in surgical practice today to continuously improve clinical management of patients and foster innovation in this field.
期刊最新文献
Single-port flexible endoscopic enterolysis under the guidance of electromagnetic navigation in a hypochlorite-induced abdominal adhesions pig model. Comparison between plate cage system and stand-alone cage in the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients with cervical kyphosis: clinical and radiographic outcomes. ERAS-based sequential olive oil-lactulose protocol in day-case laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a prospective comparison. Minimally invasive or open esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a comprehensive systematic review of surgical and survival outcomes. Case Report: Intractable hiccups induced by gallbladder necrosis after laparoscopic distal D2 radical gastrectomy: two cases report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1