"We Need a Supportive Clinic": Comparing the Effects of Patient-Centered Communication and Perceived Social Isolation on Subjective Well-Being Between LGBs and Heterosexuals.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Health Communication Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1080/10410236.2025.2464809
Yang Wu, Yiqian Gao
{"title":"\"We Need a Supportive Clinic\": Comparing the Effects of Patient-Centered Communication and Perceived Social Isolation on Subjective Well-Being Between LGBs and Heterosexuals.","authors":"Yang Wu, Yiqian Gao","doi":"10.1080/10410236.2025.2464809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The current literature lauds patient-centered communication for its potential to improve patient health outcomes, particularly by enhancing social support. However, this study presents a more nuanced and even contrasting narrative. Grounded in Minority Stress Theory and utilizing secondary survey data from the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 6), the study uncovers three key findings. First, gay, lesbian, and bisexual individuals experience greater health disparities than heterosexuals, reporting notably lower levels of patient-centered communication and subjective well-being (both hedonic and eudaimonic) while higher levels of sense of social isolation. Second, patient-centered communication has the potential to either enhance or worsen both hedonic and eudaimonic well-being by alleviating or exacerbating perceived social isolation. Third, this mediation mechanism is not exclusive to gay, lesbian, and bisexual individuals but applies to heterosexuals as well. Given that patient-centered communication can both mitigate and exacerbate patients' feelings of social isolation and that sense of social isolation remains a pervasive concern across populations (minority groups in particular), this study underscores the critical need for developing culturally competent healthcare environments for all (minority groups), extending beyond sexual orientation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12889,"journal":{"name":"Health Communication","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2025.2464809","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current literature lauds patient-centered communication for its potential to improve patient health outcomes, particularly by enhancing social support. However, this study presents a more nuanced and even contrasting narrative. Grounded in Minority Stress Theory and utilizing secondary survey data from the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 6), the study uncovers three key findings. First, gay, lesbian, and bisexual individuals experience greater health disparities than heterosexuals, reporting notably lower levels of patient-centered communication and subjective well-being (both hedonic and eudaimonic) while higher levels of sense of social isolation. Second, patient-centered communication has the potential to either enhance or worsen both hedonic and eudaimonic well-being by alleviating or exacerbating perceived social isolation. Third, this mediation mechanism is not exclusive to gay, lesbian, and bisexual individuals but applies to heterosexuals as well. Given that patient-centered communication can both mitigate and exacerbate patients' feelings of social isolation and that sense of social isolation remains a pervasive concern across populations (minority groups in particular), this study underscores the critical need for developing culturally competent healthcare environments for all (minority groups), extending beyond sexual orientation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: As an outlet for scholarly intercourse between medical and social sciences, this noteworthy journal seeks to improve practical communication between caregivers and patients and between institutions and the public. Outstanding editorial board members and contributors from both medical and social science arenas collaborate to meet the challenges inherent in this goal. Although most inclusions are data-based, the journal also publishes pedagogical, methodological, theoretical, and applied articles using both quantitative or qualitative methods.
期刊最新文献
Discourse and Misconceptions About Sexually Transmitted Infections in Lesbian Subreddits: A Health Belief Model Analysis. "We Need a Supportive Clinic": Comparing the Effects of Patient-Centered Communication and Perceived Social Isolation on Subjective Well-Being Between LGBs and Heterosexuals. How Metaphors May Enhance Health Communication: The Case of Dry Eye Syndrome. Silenced & Marginalized: The Role of Gendered Racial Microaggressions on Partner Communication and Condom-Use Intentions Among Black Emerging Adult Women. Wellbeing for the Blind and Visually Impaired: An Arts-Based Cripistemological Ethnography of Alexandria, Egypt's Taha Hussein Library.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1