Health Care Professionals' Views of Barriers and Facilitators for Implementing a Fall Risk Screening Tool in Clinical and Public Health Settings.

IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Physical Therapy Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1093/ptj/pzaf018
Nathalie Frisendahl, Patrik Karlsson, Christina Sandlund, Stina Ek, Erika Franzén, Anne-Marie Boström, Anna-Karin Welmer
{"title":"Health Care Professionals' Views of Barriers and Facilitators for Implementing a Fall Risk Screening Tool in Clinical and Public Health Settings.","authors":"Nathalie Frisendahl, Patrik Karlsson, Christina Sandlund, Stina Ek, Erika Franzén, Anne-Marie Boström, Anna-Karin Welmer","doi":"10.1093/ptj/pzaf018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The experiences of health care professionals using new screening tools in clinical and public health settings are crucial to the implementation process. However, further research is needed on their experiences with fall risk screening. This study utilized the integrated-Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (i-PARIHS) framework to explore health care professionals' experiences with the First-time Injurious Falls (FIF) screening tool, aiming to identify barriers and facilitators for implementing the FIF tool in primary health care and public health settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative study with 4 focus group interviews and 7 individual interviews was carried out, using a semi-structured interview guide. The interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed with reflexive thematic analysis. The study.included 20 participants (13 females and 7 males), with a mean age of 39 years (range 24 to 54). The participants were working in the primary health care setting (8 physical therapists, 3 occupational therapists, 3 managers, 2 registered nurses, and 1 dietician) and in a public health project (1 physical therapist and 2 health educators).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis resulted in 3 themes: \"A valuable tool in clinical practice,\" \"How to get everyone onboard when implementing fall risk screening,\" and \"Applicable in many areas of health services but not in all\" with 4 related subthemes \"Quick and easy to use for all health care professionals,\" \"Simplifies assessment and creates a platform for discussion,\" \"Need for clear instructions and action list,\" and \"Should be incorporated into daily routines.\"</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The FIF tool was well-received by participants in practice as it was user-friendly and potentially effective in preventing falls. However, there is room for improvement, particularly in clarifying instructions to mitigate possible misinterpretations. The participants emphasized that implementation of a new screening tool requires favorable organizational conditions such as managerial support, that the tool is easily accessible, and the results are easy to document.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>The FIF tool seems to be a valuable screening tool for predicting first-time injurious falls in older adults, suitable for use by various health care professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":20093,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzaf018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The experiences of health care professionals using new screening tools in clinical and public health settings are crucial to the implementation process. However, further research is needed on their experiences with fall risk screening. This study utilized the integrated-Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (i-PARIHS) framework to explore health care professionals' experiences with the First-time Injurious Falls (FIF) screening tool, aiming to identify barriers and facilitators for implementing the FIF tool in primary health care and public health settings.

Methods: A qualitative study with 4 focus group interviews and 7 individual interviews was carried out, using a semi-structured interview guide. The interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed with reflexive thematic analysis. The study.included 20 participants (13 females and 7 males), with a mean age of 39 years (range 24 to 54). The participants were working in the primary health care setting (8 physical therapists, 3 occupational therapists, 3 managers, 2 registered nurses, and 1 dietician) and in a public health project (1 physical therapist and 2 health educators).

Results: The analysis resulted in 3 themes: "A valuable tool in clinical practice," "How to get everyone onboard when implementing fall risk screening," and "Applicable in many areas of health services but not in all" with 4 related subthemes "Quick and easy to use for all health care professionals," "Simplifies assessment and creates a platform for discussion," "Need for clear instructions and action list," and "Should be incorporated into daily routines."

Conclusion: The FIF tool was well-received by participants in practice as it was user-friendly and potentially effective in preventing falls. However, there is room for improvement, particularly in clarifying instructions to mitigate possible misinterpretations. The participants emphasized that implementation of a new screening tool requires favorable organizational conditions such as managerial support, that the tool is easily accessible, and the results are easy to document.

Impact: The FIF tool seems to be a valuable screening tool for predicting first-time injurious falls in older adults, suitable for use by various health care professionals.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Physical Therapy
Physical Therapy Multiple-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Physical Therapy (PTJ) engages and inspires an international readership on topics related to physical therapy. As the leading international journal for research in physical therapy and related fields, PTJ publishes innovative and highly relevant content for both clinicians and scientists and uses a variety of interactive approaches to communicate that content, with the expressed purpose of improving patient care. PTJ"s circulation in 2008 is more than 72,000. Its 2007 impact factor was 2.152. The mean time from submission to first decision is 58 days. Time from acceptance to publication online is less than or equal to 3 months and from acceptance to publication in print is less than or equal to 5 months.
期刊最新文献
Health Care Professionals' Views of Barriers and Facilitators for Implementing a Fall Risk Screening Tool in Clinical and Public Health Settings. Metabolic Health Screening in Physical Therapist Private Practice in Australia: A Feasibility Study. Sitting Together and Reaching to Play (START-Play) Physical Therapy Affects Dyadic Emotional Availability in Children and with Neuromotor Delay and their Families. Application of Algorithm-Based Treatment Approach to Low Back Pain in the Emergency Department. Validation of the Revised American Physical Therapy Association Physical Therapist Clinical Performance Instrument 3.0.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1