Validation of the Revised American Physical Therapy Association Physical Therapist Clinical Performance Instrument 3.0.

IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Physical Therapy Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1093/ptj/pzaf015
Derrick F Campbell, Mansoor Alameri, Felicity Macahilig-Rice, Sean E Witkin, Nancy G Hellman
{"title":"Validation of the Revised American Physical Therapy Association Physical Therapist Clinical Performance Instrument 3.0.","authors":"Derrick F Campbell, Mansoor Alameri, Felicity Macahilig-Rice, Sean E Witkin, Nancy G Hellman","doi":"10.1093/ptj/pzaf015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Validation of the revised American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) Physical Therapist Clinical Performance Instrument (PT CPI 3.0) is essential to ensure that we are effectively assessing Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) students' clinical performance.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose was to validate the revised PT CPI 3.0 for use with DPT students as a measure of clinical performance.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A descriptive and exploratory combined cross-sectional retrospective and prospective cohort design was used.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>University DPT students' clinical education experiences were explored.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Participants were selected using a convenience sample of 693 DPT students from 1 US multi-campus DPT program(s) during Fall 2023 and Spring 2024 clinical education experiences.</p><p><strong>Exposure(s): </strong>DPT students on (1) integrated (ICE) and (2) 2 terminal clinical education experiences (TCE I and TCE II) participated in the study.</p><p><strong>Main outcome(s): </strong>Clinical instructor (CI) PT CPI 3.0 item ratings of DPT students at midterm and final assessments during clinical education experiences were investigated.</p><p><strong>Measure(s): </strong>Descriptive and inferential statistics evaluated differences between CI PT CPI 3.0 item ratings of DPT students during clinical education experiences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PT CPI 3.0 demonstrated good internal reliability, and factor analysis with a 1-factor solution explained 81.3% of variance. Construct validity was supported by significant differences in PT CPI item scores between DPT students on integrated (ICE) and each of 2 terminal clinical education experiences (TCE I and TCE II). Construct and convergent validity were supported by significant score increases from midterm to final assessments for DPT students on integrated and terminal clinical education experiences and by moderate to large correlations between prior clinical experiences and remaining didactic coursework.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings support validity of the revised PT CPI 3.0 as a measure of clinical performance. A limitation is that this study did not assess rater reliability.</p><p><strong>Relevance: </strong>This study provides preliminary support for validation of the newly revised APTA PT CPI 3.0 as a measure to assess entry-level physical therapist student clinical performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":20093,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzaf015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Validation of the revised American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) Physical Therapist Clinical Performance Instrument (PT CPI 3.0) is essential to ensure that we are effectively assessing Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) students' clinical performance.

Objective: The purpose was to validate the revised PT CPI 3.0 for use with DPT students as a measure of clinical performance.

Design: A descriptive and exploratory combined cross-sectional retrospective and prospective cohort design was used.

Setting: University DPT students' clinical education experiences were explored.

Participants: Participants were selected using a convenience sample of 693 DPT students from 1 US multi-campus DPT program(s) during Fall 2023 and Spring 2024 clinical education experiences.

Exposure(s): DPT students on (1) integrated (ICE) and (2) 2 terminal clinical education experiences (TCE I and TCE II) participated in the study.

Main outcome(s): Clinical instructor (CI) PT CPI 3.0 item ratings of DPT students at midterm and final assessments during clinical education experiences were investigated.

Measure(s): Descriptive and inferential statistics evaluated differences between CI PT CPI 3.0 item ratings of DPT students during clinical education experiences.

Results: The PT CPI 3.0 demonstrated good internal reliability, and factor analysis with a 1-factor solution explained 81.3% of variance. Construct validity was supported by significant differences in PT CPI item scores between DPT students on integrated (ICE) and each of 2 terminal clinical education experiences (TCE I and TCE II). Construct and convergent validity were supported by significant score increases from midterm to final assessments for DPT students on integrated and terminal clinical education experiences and by moderate to large correlations between prior clinical experiences and remaining didactic coursework.

Conclusions: Findings support validity of the revised PT CPI 3.0 as a measure of clinical performance. A limitation is that this study did not assess rater reliability.

Relevance: This study provides preliminary support for validation of the newly revised APTA PT CPI 3.0 as a measure to assess entry-level physical therapist student clinical performance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Physical Therapy
Physical Therapy Multiple-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Physical Therapy (PTJ) engages and inspires an international readership on topics related to physical therapy. As the leading international journal for research in physical therapy and related fields, PTJ publishes innovative and highly relevant content for both clinicians and scientists and uses a variety of interactive approaches to communicate that content, with the expressed purpose of improving patient care. PTJ"s circulation in 2008 is more than 72,000. Its 2007 impact factor was 2.152. The mean time from submission to first decision is 58 days. Time from acceptance to publication online is less than or equal to 3 months and from acceptance to publication in print is less than or equal to 5 months.
期刊最新文献
Application of Algorithm-Based Treatment Approach to Low Back Pain in the Emergency Department. Validation of the Revised American Physical Therapy Association Physical Therapist Clinical Performance Instrument 3.0. Evaluating the Potential of Large Language Models for Vestibular Rehabilitation Education: A Comparison of ChatGPT, Google Gemini, and Clinicians. The Movement System and Diagnosis: Are we There Yet? Neck or Shoulder? Establishing Consensus for Spine Screening in Patients With Shoulder Pain: An International Modified Delphi Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1