World Trade Center Response Activities and Cognitive Health: A Moderated Mediation Study of the Role of Surgical/Nuisance Dust Mask Usage.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Neurotoxicology Pub Date : 2025-02-15 DOI:10.1016/j.neuro.2025.02.002
Yuan Yang, Jaymie Meliker, Lauren L Richmond, Frank D Mann, Minos Kritikos, Dylan M Smith, Tesleem Babalola, Melissa A Carr, Benjamin J Luft, Sean A P Clouston
{"title":"World Trade Center Response Activities and Cognitive Health: A Moderated Mediation Study of the Role of Surgical/Nuisance Dust Mask Usage.","authors":"Yuan Yang, Jaymie Meliker, Lauren L Richmond, Frank D Mann, Minos Kritikos, Dylan M Smith, Tesleem Babalola, Melissa A Carr, Benjamin J Luft, Sean A P Clouston","doi":"10.1016/j.neuro.2025.02.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study explores the relationship between World Trade Center (WTC) response activities (WRAs) and cognitive impairment (CI) and uses a moderated-mediation model to examine the role of wearing a surgical/nuisance dust mask.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study includes 3,285 WTC responders. Responders were placed into eight WRA groups based on self-report structured responses and free-text descriptions of activities at the WTC. The presence/absence of surgical/nuisance dust mask usage was self-reported. The outcome was CI as determined using a Montreal Cognitive Assessment score <23. Robust Poisson regression was used to examine the main effect, and counterfactual moderated-mediation analysis was used to determine the role of mask usage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The risk of CI was higher across most WRAs when compared to supervision. Mask usage was reported by 63% of responders and varied across WRAs and was associated with a reduced risk of CI (adjusted risk ratio [aRR]=0.77, p=0.008) after controlling for WRAs. Moderation effects indicated that responders are more likely to wear masks when encountering more dangerous exposures, even within the same WRA group. Responders in the WRA-enclosed group had a lower risk of CI through a moderated intermediary effect of mask usage (aRR=0.92, p=0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Surgical/nuisance dust mask usage provided mild protection against air pollution exposures during WTC response activities when compared to not wearing a mask. Results suggest that response workers at disaster sites might benefit from wearing surgical/nuisance dust masks when respirators are unavailable even when the air seems safe.</p>","PeriodicalId":19189,"journal":{"name":"Neurotoxicology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurotoxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuro.2025.02.002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study explores the relationship between World Trade Center (WTC) response activities (WRAs) and cognitive impairment (CI) and uses a moderated-mediation model to examine the role of wearing a surgical/nuisance dust mask.

Methods: This study includes 3,285 WTC responders. Responders were placed into eight WRA groups based on self-report structured responses and free-text descriptions of activities at the WTC. The presence/absence of surgical/nuisance dust mask usage was self-reported. The outcome was CI as determined using a Montreal Cognitive Assessment score <23. Robust Poisson regression was used to examine the main effect, and counterfactual moderated-mediation analysis was used to determine the role of mask usage.

Results: The risk of CI was higher across most WRAs when compared to supervision. Mask usage was reported by 63% of responders and varied across WRAs and was associated with a reduced risk of CI (adjusted risk ratio [aRR]=0.77, p=0.008) after controlling for WRAs. Moderation effects indicated that responders are more likely to wear masks when encountering more dangerous exposures, even within the same WRA group. Responders in the WRA-enclosed group had a lower risk of CI through a moderated intermediary effect of mask usage (aRR=0.92, p=0.05).

Conclusion: Surgical/nuisance dust mask usage provided mild protection against air pollution exposures during WTC response activities when compared to not wearing a mask. Results suggest that response workers at disaster sites might benefit from wearing surgical/nuisance dust masks when respirators are unavailable even when the air seems safe.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurotoxicology
Neurotoxicology 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
161
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: NeuroToxicology specializes in publishing the best peer-reviewed original research papers dealing with the effects of toxic substances on the nervous system of humans and experimental animals of all ages. The Journal emphasizes papers dealing with the neurotoxic effects of environmentally significant chemical hazards, manufactured drugs and naturally occurring compounds.
期刊最新文献
Tanshinone IIA mitigates postoperative cognitive dysfunction in aged rats by inhibiting hippocampal inflammation and ferroptosis: Role of Nrf2/SLC7A11/GPX4 axis activation World Trade Center Response Activities and Cognitive Health: A Moderated Mediation Study of the Role of Surgical/Nuisance Dust Mask Usage. Polysaccharide alleviates neurodegeneration and behavioral deficit by enhancing mitochondrial autophagy in chronic methamphetamine mice Silver Nanoparticle (AgNP), Neurotoxicity, and Putative Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP): A Review. Therapeutic potential of pranlukast against cuprizone-induced inflammatory demyelination and sensory impairment in mice: Comparison with fingolimod
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1