Relations between justice and trust in professionals working with persons with intellectual disability.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Journal of Intellectual Disabilities Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1177/17446295251319383
Alice Maniezki, Vicente Martínez-Tur, Yolanda Estreder, Carolina Moliner, Esther Gracia
{"title":"Relations between justice and trust in professionals working with persons with intellectual disability.","authors":"Alice Maniezki, Vicente Martínez-Tur, Yolanda Estreder, Carolina Moliner, Esther Gracia","doi":"10.1177/17446295251319383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study explores how the way families treat professionals (interpersonal justice) and the trust professionals have in families relate to each other over time in organizations for persons with intellectual disabilities. Interpersonal justice is based on kindness, courtesy, respect, and dignity. Trust is an attitude reflecting the extent to which one party in a relationship believes the other to be trustworthy. We studied data from 179 professionals, measuring interpersonal justice and trust three times with a separation of four weeks. Our findings highlighted a double spiral model in which interpersonal justice and trust strengthen each other, acting as key drivers of dynamic processes. Specifically, interpersonal justice at one point in time (T1) was associated with trust at a later point (T2), which then was related to interpersonal justice again (T3). Similarly, trust at an earlier time (T1) was linked to interpersonal justice later (T2), which subsequently encouraged greater trust (T3).</p>","PeriodicalId":46904,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities","volume":" ","pages":"17446295251319383"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17446295251319383","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores how the way families treat professionals (interpersonal justice) and the trust professionals have in families relate to each other over time in organizations for persons with intellectual disabilities. Interpersonal justice is based on kindness, courtesy, respect, and dignity. Trust is an attitude reflecting the extent to which one party in a relationship believes the other to be trustworthy. We studied data from 179 professionals, measuring interpersonal justice and trust three times with a separation of four weeks. Our findings highlighted a double spiral model in which interpersonal justice and trust strengthen each other, acting as key drivers of dynamic processes. Specifically, interpersonal justice at one point in time (T1) was associated with trust at a later point (T2), which then was related to interpersonal justice again (T3). Similarly, trust at an earlier time (T1) was linked to interpersonal justice later (T2), which subsequently encouraged greater trust (T3).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与智障人士打交道的专业人员的正义与信任之间的关系。
本研究探讨了在智障人士组织中,家庭如何对待专业人员(人际公正)以及专业人员在家庭中的信任关系。人与人之间的公正是建立在善良、礼貌、尊重和尊严的基础上的。信任是一种态度,反映了关系中的一方相信另一方值得信赖的程度。我们研究了179名专业人士的数据,测量了人际公正和信任三次,间隔四周。我们的研究结果强调了一个双螺旋模型,在这个模型中,人际公正和信任相互加强,是动态过程的关键驱动因素。具体而言,某一时间点(T1)的人际公平与后一时间点(T2)的信任相关,而信任又与人际公平(T3)相关。同样,早期的信任(T1)与后期的人际公正(T2)相关,后者随后鼓励更大的信任(T3)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.30%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: The principal aim of the journal is to provide a medium for the exchange of best practice, knowledge and research between academic and professional disciplines from education, social and health settings to bring about advancement of services for people with intellectual disabilities. The idea of a practice-led journal is both exciting and timely. This journal serves as a medium for all those involved with people with intellectual disabilities to submit and publish papers on issues relevant to promoting services for people with intellectual disabilities.
期刊最新文献
Public space and social interaction: Perspectives of parents of people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities. Evaluating the feasibility of a co-produced, bespoke dementia education programme for formal caregivers of individuals with intellectual disability. Assessing maladaptive stress response patterns in individuals with intellectual disabilities: Development and preliminary validation of the MSRP-Q. Family stress and resilience: Understanding the challenges faced by fathers of children with intellectual disabilities. Can the P-C-P quality framework be used to understand service quality from the perspective of service users and their significant others accessing specialist community teams for people with learning disabilities? A framework analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1