Associations of ethnic identity, religiosity, discrimination, and injustice appraisal with pain‐related outcomes in arab americans with chronic back pain

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-15 DOI:10.1016/j.jpain.2025.105337
Albatool H. Alnojeidi PhD , Carmen E. Capo-Lugo PhD , John A. Sturgeon PhD , Zina Trost PhD
{"title":"Associations of ethnic identity, religiosity, discrimination, and injustice appraisal with pain‐related outcomes in arab americans with chronic back pain","authors":"Albatool H. Alnojeidi PhD ,&nbsp;Carmen E. Capo-Lugo PhD ,&nbsp;John A. Sturgeon PhD ,&nbsp;Zina Trost PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jpain.2025.105337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><span>This study sought to examine the moderating roles of ethnic identity, acculturation, and religiosity on the relationship between pain-related injustice appraisal and chronic low back pain (CLBP) outcomes among a sample of Arab-Americans, who are an underrepresented population in prior pain research. The study also aimed to examine the mediating effect of pain-related injustice appraisal in the relationship between discrimination and CLBP outcomes. The sample included 96 Arab-American adults who completed an online survey concerning their CLBP. Multiple regression was used to examine the moderating role of ethnic identity, acculturation, and religiosity on the relationship between injustice appraisal and disability and depression. Findings showed that ethnic identity (β = 0.43, </span><em>p</em> = 0.03) and religiosity (β = 0.28, <em>p</em> = 0.04), but not acculturation, buffered the relationship between pain-related injustice appraisal and CLBP-related depressive symptoms. Perceived discrimination predicted higher pain intensity (β = 0.28), disability (β = 0.56), and depressive symptoms (β = 0.51). Pain-related injustice appraisal significantly mediated the relationship between discrimination and CLBP-related disability (β = 0.24, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.0001), and depressive symptoms (β = 0.22, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.0001). The current study is the first to examine the role of unique ethnic characteristics, namely ethnic identity, acculturation, and religiosity, within the context of pain-related injustice appraisal. The results support the role of broader sociocultural and societal factors, such as ethnic-based discrimination, within the context of pain-related injustice appraisal as well as the influence of intra- and interpersonal factors and their interactions on pain-related injustice appraisal.</div></div><div><h3>Perspective</h3><div>This study is the first to demonstrate the unique role of ethnic identification, acculturation, and religiosity within the concept of pain-related injustice appraisal, specifically among Arab-Americans with chronic low back pain. This understanding could potentially help basic researchers, clinical scientists, as well as clinicians.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51095,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain","volume":"37 ","pages":"Article 105337"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1526590025005644","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study sought to examine the moderating roles of ethnic identity, acculturation, and religiosity on the relationship between pain-related injustice appraisal and chronic low back pain (CLBP) outcomes among a sample of Arab-Americans, who are an underrepresented population in prior pain research. The study also aimed to examine the mediating effect of pain-related injustice appraisal in the relationship between discrimination and CLBP outcomes. The sample included 96 Arab-American adults who completed an online survey concerning their CLBP. Multiple regression was used to examine the moderating role of ethnic identity, acculturation, and religiosity on the relationship between injustice appraisal and disability and depression. Findings showed that ethnic identity (β = 0.43, p = 0.03) and religiosity (β = 0.28, p = 0.04), but not acculturation, buffered the relationship between pain-related injustice appraisal and CLBP-related depressive symptoms. Perceived discrimination predicted higher pain intensity (β = 0.28), disability (β = 0.56), and depressive symptoms (β = 0.51). Pain-related injustice appraisal significantly mediated the relationship between discrimination and CLBP-related disability (β = 0.24, p < 0.0001), and depressive symptoms (β = 0.22, p < 0.0001). The current study is the first to examine the role of unique ethnic characteristics, namely ethnic identity, acculturation, and religiosity, within the context of pain-related injustice appraisal. The results support the role of broader sociocultural and societal factors, such as ethnic-based discrimination, within the context of pain-related injustice appraisal as well as the influence of intra- and interpersonal factors and their interactions on pain-related injustice appraisal.

Perspective

This study is the first to demonstrate the unique role of ethnic identification, acculturation, and religiosity within the concept of pain-related injustice appraisal, specifically among Arab-Americans with chronic low back pain. This understanding could potentially help basic researchers, clinical scientists, as well as clinicians.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿拉伯裔美国人慢性背痛患者的种族认同、宗教信仰、歧视和不公正评价与疼痛相关结果的关联。
本研究旨在探讨种族认同、文化适应和宗教信仰对疼痛相关不公正评价与慢性腰痛(CLBP)结果之间关系的调节作用,该研究样本为阿拉伯裔美国人,他们在先前的疼痛研究中是一个代表性不足的人群。本研究还旨在探讨疼痛相关不公正评价在歧视与CLBP结果之间的中介作用。样本包括96名阿拉伯裔美国成年人,他们完成了一项关于他们的CLBP的在线调查。多元回归分析了民族认同、文化适应和宗教信仰对不公正评价与残疾和抑郁关系的调节作用。结果显示,种族认同(β = 0.43, p = 0.03)和宗教信仰(β = 0.28, p = 0.04)缓冲了疼痛相关不公正评价与clbp相关抑郁症状的关系,而文化适应不起缓冲作用。感知歧视预示着更高的疼痛强度(β = 0.28)、残疾(β = 0.56)和抑郁症状(β = 0.51)。疼痛相关不公正评价显著介导了歧视与clbp相关残疾(β = 0.24, p < 0.0001)和抑郁症状(β = 0.22, p < 0.0001)之间的关系。本研究首次考察了独特的民族特征,即民族认同、文化适应和宗教信仰在疼痛相关不公正评价中的作用。研究结果支持了更广泛的社会文化和社会因素(如种族歧视)在疼痛相关不公正评价中的作用,以及内部和人际因素及其相互作用对疼痛相关不公正评价的影响。观点:本研究首次证明了种族认同、文化适应和宗教信仰在疼痛相关不公正评价概念中的独特作用,特别是在患有慢性腰痛的阿拉伯裔美国人中。这种理解可能有助于基础研究人员、临床科学家以及临床医生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pain
Journal of Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
7.50%
发文量
441
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pain publishes original articles related to all aspects of pain, including clinical and basic research, patient care, education, and health policy. Articles selected for publication in the Journal are most commonly reports of original clinical research or reports of original basic research. In addition, invited critical reviews, including meta analyses of drugs for pain management, invited commentaries on reviews, and exceptional case studies are published in the Journal. The mission of the Journal is to improve the care of patients in pain by providing a forum for clinical researchers, basic scientists, clinicians, and other health professionals to publish original research.
期刊最新文献
Reliability and stability of pain ratings and secondary hyperalgesia to experimental phasic heat pain across multiple days and weeks Development of a Central Sensitization Inventory short form using data from twenty-three countries Cross-sectional and within-person associations of chronic overlapping pain conditions and psychosocial functioning in young adults “Dancing in Pain is a Symbol of Determination” – Understanding dance related pain in relation to dancer identity using the biopsychosocial model of health What we read matters: Exploring emotional and cognitive responses of pain science education and biomedical education in older adults with knee osteoarthritis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1