Peach fruit quality on the fresh market: A long-term evaluation series from Northern Italy is pushing the overturn of commercial standards within the mass-supply chain
{"title":"Peach fruit quality on the fresh market: A long-term evaluation series from Northern Italy is pushing the overturn of commercial standards within the mass-supply chain","authors":"Irina Baccichet , Francesca Patuelli , Benedetta Pozzetto , Alessandro Giulio Tagliabue , Cassia da Silva Linge , Gianluca Biffi , Elisa Calastri , Remo Chiozzotto , Daniele Bassi , Paola Sgarbi , Marco Cirilli","doi":"10.1016/j.postharvbio.2025.113460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Commercial peach fruit quality standards mainly rely on visual and fruit size attributes, often unpredictable or unrelated to organoleptic pleasantness. Hence, surveys on consumers’ continuously reports a poor fresh internal quality of peaches as the main cause of a widespread disaffection. In addition, the consistent adoption of similar selection criteria among main breeding programs hampers a marked improvement of enhanced flavour. This eight-years study reported the quality analysis of 52 peach cultivars sold across several mass-supply chain channels (the so-called ‘Organized Large-Scale Retail Distribution’, GDO), describing the current landscape of marketed peaches in Italy. In addition to the evaluation of external and internal quality parameters, a group of experienced panelists performed a sensory evaluation at commercial ripening (‘ready-to-buy’ stage) and after shelf-life (‘ready-to-eat’) to complement analytic determination and further investigate its relationship with human perception. Overall, soluble solid content (SSC) resulted inconsistent and generally low over the years of assessment, particularly in early and mid-season cultivars. This evidence negatively impacted panelists’ pleasantness that, in turn, appeared strongly dependent on taste sensorial experience and, above all, on aroma and sweetness perception. In particular, aroma tended to be poorly perceived with SSCs below 12 %, while a significant superior preference occurred with SSC above 14 % and a BrimA index above 27. The almost negligible effect of shelf-life on SSC emphasized the largest effect of the pre-harvest conditions for this feature. Accordingly, this study endorses an impelling improvement of the agronomic practices currently adopted and, hopefully, a reorganization of the whole peach retailers’ distribution chain to really meet consumers’ preferences.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20328,"journal":{"name":"Postharvest Biology and Technology","volume":"224 ","pages":"Article 113460"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postharvest Biology and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925521425000729","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Commercial peach fruit quality standards mainly rely on visual and fruit size attributes, often unpredictable or unrelated to organoleptic pleasantness. Hence, surveys on consumers’ continuously reports a poor fresh internal quality of peaches as the main cause of a widespread disaffection. In addition, the consistent adoption of similar selection criteria among main breeding programs hampers a marked improvement of enhanced flavour. This eight-years study reported the quality analysis of 52 peach cultivars sold across several mass-supply chain channels (the so-called ‘Organized Large-Scale Retail Distribution’, GDO), describing the current landscape of marketed peaches in Italy. In addition to the evaluation of external and internal quality parameters, a group of experienced panelists performed a sensory evaluation at commercial ripening (‘ready-to-buy’ stage) and after shelf-life (‘ready-to-eat’) to complement analytic determination and further investigate its relationship with human perception. Overall, soluble solid content (SSC) resulted inconsistent and generally low over the years of assessment, particularly in early and mid-season cultivars. This evidence negatively impacted panelists’ pleasantness that, in turn, appeared strongly dependent on taste sensorial experience and, above all, on aroma and sweetness perception. In particular, aroma tended to be poorly perceived with SSCs below 12 %, while a significant superior preference occurred with SSC above 14 % and a BrimA index above 27. The almost negligible effect of shelf-life on SSC emphasized the largest effect of the pre-harvest conditions for this feature. Accordingly, this study endorses an impelling improvement of the agronomic practices currently adopted and, hopefully, a reorganization of the whole peach retailers’ distribution chain to really meet consumers’ preferences.
期刊介绍:
The journal is devoted exclusively to the publication of original papers, review articles and frontiers articles on biological and technological postharvest research. This includes the areas of postharvest storage, treatments and underpinning mechanisms, quality evaluation, packaging, handling and distribution of fresh horticultural crops including fruit, vegetables, flowers and nuts, but excluding grains, seeds and forages.
Papers reporting novel insights from fundamental and interdisciplinary research will be particularly encouraged. These disciplines include systems biology, bioinformatics, entomology, plant physiology, plant pathology, (bio)chemistry, engineering, modelling, and technologies for nondestructive testing.
Manuscripts on fresh food crops that will be further processed after postharvest storage, or on food processes beyond refrigeration, packaging and minimal processing will not be considered.