Peach fruit quality on the fresh market: A long-term evaluation series from Northern Italy is pushing the overturn of commercial standards within the mass-supply chain

IF 6.8 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY Postharvest Biology and Technology Pub Date : 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1016/j.postharvbio.2025.113460
Irina Baccichet , Francesca Patuelli , Benedetta Pozzetto , Alessandro Giulio Tagliabue , Cassia da Silva Linge , Gianluca Biffi , Elisa Calastri , Remo Chiozzotto , Daniele Bassi , Paola Sgarbi , Marco Cirilli
{"title":"Peach fruit quality on the fresh market: A long-term evaluation series from Northern Italy is pushing the overturn of commercial standards within the mass-supply chain","authors":"Irina Baccichet ,&nbsp;Francesca Patuelli ,&nbsp;Benedetta Pozzetto ,&nbsp;Alessandro Giulio Tagliabue ,&nbsp;Cassia da Silva Linge ,&nbsp;Gianluca Biffi ,&nbsp;Elisa Calastri ,&nbsp;Remo Chiozzotto ,&nbsp;Daniele Bassi ,&nbsp;Paola Sgarbi ,&nbsp;Marco Cirilli","doi":"10.1016/j.postharvbio.2025.113460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Commercial peach fruit quality standards mainly rely on visual and fruit size attributes, often unpredictable or unrelated to organoleptic pleasantness. Hence, surveys on consumers’ continuously reports a poor fresh internal quality of peaches as the main cause of a widespread disaffection. In addition, the consistent adoption of similar selection criteria among main breeding programs hampers a marked improvement of enhanced flavour. This eight-years study reported the quality analysis of 52 peach cultivars sold across several mass-supply chain channels (the so-called ‘Organized Large-Scale Retail Distribution’, GDO), describing the current landscape of marketed peaches in Italy. In addition to the evaluation of external and internal quality parameters, a group of experienced panelists performed a sensory evaluation at commercial ripening (‘ready-to-buy’ stage) and after shelf-life (‘ready-to-eat’) to complement analytic determination and further investigate its relationship with human perception. Overall, soluble solid content (SSC) resulted inconsistent and generally low over the years of assessment, particularly in early and mid-season cultivars. This evidence negatively impacted panelists’ pleasantness that, in turn, appeared strongly dependent on taste sensorial experience and, above all, on aroma and sweetness perception. In particular, aroma tended to be poorly perceived with SSCs below 12 %, while a significant superior preference occurred with SSC above 14 % and a BrimA index above 27. The almost negligible effect of shelf-life on SSC emphasized the largest effect of the pre-harvest conditions for this feature. Accordingly, this study endorses an impelling improvement of the agronomic practices currently adopted and, hopefully, a reorganization of the whole peach retailers’ distribution chain to really meet consumers’ preferences.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20328,"journal":{"name":"Postharvest Biology and Technology","volume":"224 ","pages":"Article 113460"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postharvest Biology and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925521425000729","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Commercial peach fruit quality standards mainly rely on visual and fruit size attributes, often unpredictable or unrelated to organoleptic pleasantness. Hence, surveys on consumers’ continuously reports a poor fresh internal quality of peaches as the main cause of a widespread disaffection. In addition, the consistent adoption of similar selection criteria among main breeding programs hampers a marked improvement of enhanced flavour. This eight-years study reported the quality analysis of 52 peach cultivars sold across several mass-supply chain channels (the so-called ‘Organized Large-Scale Retail Distribution’, GDO), describing the current landscape of marketed peaches in Italy. In addition to the evaluation of external and internal quality parameters, a group of experienced panelists performed a sensory evaluation at commercial ripening (‘ready-to-buy’ stage) and after shelf-life (‘ready-to-eat’) to complement analytic determination and further investigate its relationship with human perception. Overall, soluble solid content (SSC) resulted inconsistent and generally low over the years of assessment, particularly in early and mid-season cultivars. This evidence negatively impacted panelists’ pleasantness that, in turn, appeared strongly dependent on taste sensorial experience and, above all, on aroma and sweetness perception. In particular, aroma tended to be poorly perceived with SSCs below 12 %, while a significant superior preference occurred with SSC above 14 % and a BrimA index above 27. The almost negligible effect of shelf-life on SSC emphasized the largest effect of the pre-harvest conditions for this feature. Accordingly, this study endorses an impelling improvement of the agronomic practices currently adopted and, hopefully, a reorganization of the whole peach retailers’ distribution chain to really meet consumers’ preferences.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新鲜市场上的桃果质量:来自意大利北部的长期评估系列正在推动大规模供应链内商业标准的颠覆
商业桃果质量标准主要依赖于视觉和果实大小属性,往往不可预测或与感官愉悦无关。因此,对消费者的调查不断反映,桃子的新鲜内部质量差是引起广泛不满的主要原因。此外,在主要育种计划中一致采用类似的选择标准阻碍了增强风味的显著改进。这项为期八年的研究报告了52个桃子品种在几个大规模供应链渠道(所谓的“有组织的大规模零售分销”,GDO)上销售的质量分析,描述了意大利市场上桃子的现状。除了外部和内部质量参数的评估,一组经验丰富的小组成员在商业成熟(“准备购买”阶段)和货架期(“准备食用”)后进行了感官评估,以补充分析测定并进一步调查其与人类感知的关系。总体而言,可溶性固形物含量(SSC)不一致,在多年的评估中普遍较低,特别是在早季和中季品种中。这一证据对小组成员的愉悦感产生了负面影响,反过来,这种愉悦感似乎强烈依赖于味觉体验,尤其是香气和甜味感知。特别是,当SSC低于12 %时,香气的感知能力较差,而SSC高于14 %和BrimA指数高于27时,香气的感知能力明显优于SSC。货架期对SSC几乎可以忽略不计的影响强调了采收前条件对这一特性的最大影响。因此,本研究支持对目前采用的农艺实践进行令人信服的改进,并希望对整个桃子零售商的分销链进行重组,以真正满足消费者的偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Postharvest Biology and Technology
Postharvest Biology and Technology 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
11.40%
发文量
309
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The journal is devoted exclusively to the publication of original papers, review articles and frontiers articles on biological and technological postharvest research. This includes the areas of postharvest storage, treatments and underpinning mechanisms, quality evaluation, packaging, handling and distribution of fresh horticultural crops including fruit, vegetables, flowers and nuts, but excluding grains, seeds and forages. Papers reporting novel insights from fundamental and interdisciplinary research will be particularly encouraged. These disciplines include systems biology, bioinformatics, entomology, plant physiology, plant pathology, (bio)chemistry, engineering, modelling, and technologies for nondestructive testing. Manuscripts on fresh food crops that will be further processed after postharvest storage, or on food processes beyond refrigeration, packaging and minimal processing will not be considered.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Sulfur dioxide maintains postharvest aroma quality of table grapes by modulating the lipoxygenase pathway and ethanol metabolism Catechol 1, 2-dioxygenase AaCHD is essential for the detoxification of phenolic acids in pear fruit peel by Alternaria alternata R2R3-MYB transcription factors in regulating postharvest quality of fruit and vegetables during cold storage: Mechanisms and prospects Melatonin–nitric oxide crosstalk enhances postharvest chilling tolerance in mango: Physiological, biochemical, and transcriptional evidence for activation of antioxidant defense and cold-responsive genes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1