Prospective life cycle assessment of solid recovered fuel utilization and marine fuel production cement plants

IF 10.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Sustainable Production and Consumption Pub Date : 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1016/j.spc.2025.02.012
Daniel Fozer, Mikołaj Owsianiak, Michael Zwicky Hauschild
{"title":"Prospective life cycle assessment of solid recovered fuel utilization and marine fuel production cement plants","authors":"Daniel Fozer,&nbsp;Mikołaj Owsianiak,&nbsp;Michael Zwicky Hauschild","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.02.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Incumbent clinker production practices fall short of meeting carbon-emission neutral targets, pressing the need to implement waste valorization approaches in cement plants to mitigate environmental impacts. However, there is a lack of knowledge on the future environmental performance of emerging waste-to-heat and fuel upcycling in clinker manufacturing. This study examines the prospective life cycle impacts of (1) solid recovered fuel (SRF) utilization and (2) on-site marine fuel production using integrated fluidized bed pyrolysis to substitute fossil fuels in clinker production and marine transportation. Environmental impacts are projected between 2025 and 2050 by applying learning effects in the foreground life cycle inventory and shared socioeconomic pathways (SSP1, SSP2), extended with the 1.9 W m<sup>−2</sup> representative concentration pathway (SSP2-RCP1.9), in the background system. The highest decarbonization progress (−538.9 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq (t clinker)<sup>−1</sup>) is achieved under the SSP2-RCP1.9 development trajectory, driven by avoidance of emissions from waste management systems and converting biogenic carbon-rich municipal solid waste resources. The predicted CO<sub>2</sub>-eq impacts are found to be lower than the point source emission from raw meal calcination in several SSP scenarios, indicating that carbon-emission neutrality is attainable in combination with retrofitted carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) technologies. The assessment highlights the potential for burden shifting to other environmental impacts, e.g., particulate matter formation (+37.0 % by 2050), pointing to the need to evaluate additional pyrolysis oil upgrading and NO<sub>X</sub> emission mitigation strategies. Overall, synergizing waste pyrolysis with clinker production is found to be favourable due to (i) improved energy requirements, (ii) reduced fossil fuel use and impacts on climate change and ecosystem quality, and (iii) high potential for technological learning-driven environmental progress.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"55 ","pages":"Pages 117-131"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235255092500034X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Incumbent clinker production practices fall short of meeting carbon-emission neutral targets, pressing the need to implement waste valorization approaches in cement plants to mitigate environmental impacts. However, there is a lack of knowledge on the future environmental performance of emerging waste-to-heat and fuel upcycling in clinker manufacturing. This study examines the prospective life cycle impacts of (1) solid recovered fuel (SRF) utilization and (2) on-site marine fuel production using integrated fluidized bed pyrolysis to substitute fossil fuels in clinker production and marine transportation. Environmental impacts are projected between 2025 and 2050 by applying learning effects in the foreground life cycle inventory and shared socioeconomic pathways (SSP1, SSP2), extended with the 1.9 W m−2 representative concentration pathway (SSP2-RCP1.9), in the background system. The highest decarbonization progress (−538.9 kg CO2-eq (t clinker)−1) is achieved under the SSP2-RCP1.9 development trajectory, driven by avoidance of emissions from waste management systems and converting biogenic carbon-rich municipal solid waste resources. The predicted CO2-eq impacts are found to be lower than the point source emission from raw meal calcination in several SSP scenarios, indicating that carbon-emission neutrality is attainable in combination with retrofitted carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) technologies. The assessment highlights the potential for burden shifting to other environmental impacts, e.g., particulate matter formation (+37.0 % by 2050), pointing to the need to evaluate additional pyrolysis oil upgrading and NOX emission mitigation strategies. Overall, synergizing waste pyrolysis with clinker production is found to be favourable due to (i) improved energy requirements, (ii) reduced fossil fuel use and impacts on climate change and ecosystem quality, and (iii) high potential for technological learning-driven environmental progress.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
现有的熟料生产方式无法实现碳排放中和目标,因此迫切需要在水泥厂实施废物价值化方法,以减轻对环境的影响。然而,人们对熟料生产中新兴的废物变热和燃料升级再循环的未来环境绩效缺乏了解。本研究探讨了(1)利用固体回收燃料(SRF)和(2)利用综合流化床热解现场生产船用燃料,以替代熟料生产和海运中的化石燃料的预期生命周期影响。通过在前景生命周期清单和共享社会经济路径(SSP1、SSP2)中应用学习效应,并在背景系统中扩展 1.9 W m-2 代表浓度路径(SSP2-RCP1.9),预测了 2025 年至 2050 年期间的环境影响。在SSP2-RCP1.9发展轨迹下,由于避免了废物管理系统的排放并转化了富含生物碳的城市固体废物资源,实现了最高的脱碳进度(-538.9 kg CO2当量(t熟料)-1)。在几个 SSP 情景下,预测的二氧化碳当量影响低于生料煅烧产生的点源排放,这表明结合碳捕集、利用和封存(CCUS)技术的改造,碳排放中和是可以实现的。评估强调了将负担转移到其他环境影响上的可能性,例如颗粒物的形成(到 2050 年增加 37.0%),这表明有必要评估更多的热解油升级和氮氧化物排放减缓战略。总之,废物热解与熟料生产的协同作用被认为是有利的,因为(i) 改善了能源需求,(ii) 减少了化石燃料的使用以及对气候变化和生态系统质量的影响,(iii) 技术学习驱动环境进步的潜力很大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sustainable Production and Consumption
Sustainable Production and Consumption Environmental Science-Environmental Engineering
CiteScore
17.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
389
审稿时长
13 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable production and consumption refers to the production and utilization of goods and services in a way that benefits society, is economically viable, and has minimal environmental impact throughout its entire lifespan. Our journal is dedicated to publishing top-notch interdisciplinary research and practical studies in this emerging field. We take a distinctive approach by examining the interplay between technology, consumption patterns, and policy to identify sustainable solutions for both production and consumption systems.
期刊最新文献
Prospective life cycle assessment of solid recovered fuel utilization and marine fuel production cement plants Life cycle assessment of apple production and consumption under different sales models in China Anticipatory sustainability assessment framework for material development demonstrated on material selection for bio-based benzoxazine synthesis Integrating life cycle assessment and ecodesign to improve product effectiveness and environmental performance: A novel approach Joint assessment of the environmental impacts and resource criticality of French food consumption scenarios in 2050 from a regionalised life cycle perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1