How can ecosystem services trade-offs/synergies help select the optimal cultivated land restoration pattern? A study based on multi-scenario simulations
Xian Zhao , Wei Sun , Shiqin Zhang , Yinan Yang , Yixuan Yang , Hailian Lan , Tao Yu , Xiangyun Li , Yujing Xie
{"title":"How can ecosystem services trade-offs/synergies help select the optimal cultivated land restoration pattern? A study based on multi-scenario simulations","authors":"Xian Zhao , Wei Sun , Shiqin Zhang , Yinan Yang , Yixuan Yang , Hailian Lan , Tao Yu , Xiangyun Li , Yujing Xie","doi":"10.1016/j.apgeog.2025.103563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Nowadays, the growing \"non-grain\" use of cultivated land in certain regions of China has posed significant risks to local grain supplies. This has necessitated urgent restoration of \"non-grain\" cultivated land to its original purpose. Land use changes may have positive or negative effects on ecosystem services. This study explores whether and how cultivated land restoration can enhance grain production while minimizing regulating services loss. The Sanjianghui area in Hangzhou city, China, was selected as a case study to examine effects of different restoration scenarios, on provisioning and regulating services and their trade-offs. The findings suggested that the types, quantity and location of restored areas significantly influenced ecosystem services. Across eight scenarios, both trade-offs and synergies between provisioning and regulating services were observed as the restoration area expanded. The optimal scenario based on trade-offs and synergies was scenario 2035-Ⅱ, which recorded the highest synergistic intensity at 26.6%. Under this scenario, grain production increased by 5.32%, and regulating services improved by 0.11% compared to the 2020 baseline. This study presents a framework to simulate the most effective pattern of cultivated land restoration, enabling increased grain production without compromising regulating services. This research offers actionable guidance for cultivated land restoration and ecosystem management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48396,"journal":{"name":"Applied Geography","volume":"177 ","pages":"Article 103563"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Geography","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014362282500058X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Nowadays, the growing "non-grain" use of cultivated land in certain regions of China has posed significant risks to local grain supplies. This has necessitated urgent restoration of "non-grain" cultivated land to its original purpose. Land use changes may have positive or negative effects on ecosystem services. This study explores whether and how cultivated land restoration can enhance grain production while minimizing regulating services loss. The Sanjianghui area in Hangzhou city, China, was selected as a case study to examine effects of different restoration scenarios, on provisioning and regulating services and their trade-offs. The findings suggested that the types, quantity and location of restored areas significantly influenced ecosystem services. Across eight scenarios, both trade-offs and synergies between provisioning and regulating services were observed as the restoration area expanded. The optimal scenario based on trade-offs and synergies was scenario 2035-Ⅱ, which recorded the highest synergistic intensity at 26.6%. Under this scenario, grain production increased by 5.32%, and regulating services improved by 0.11% compared to the 2020 baseline. This study presents a framework to simulate the most effective pattern of cultivated land restoration, enabling increased grain production without compromising regulating services. This research offers actionable guidance for cultivated land restoration and ecosystem management.
期刊介绍:
Applied Geography is a journal devoted to the publication of research which utilizes geographic approaches (human, physical, nature-society and GIScience) to resolve human problems that have a spatial dimension. These problems may be related to the assessment, management and allocation of the world physical and/or human resources. The underlying rationale of the journal is that only through a clear understanding of the relevant societal, physical, and coupled natural-humans systems can we resolve such problems. Papers are invited on any theme involving the application of geographical theory and methodology in the resolution of human problems.