Tinidazole vs metronidazole for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Pub Date : 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1007/s00404-024-07899-z
Milene Vitória Sampaio Sobral, Victor Gonçalves Soares, João Lucas de Magalhães Leal Moreira, Livia Kneipp Rodrigues, Hilária Saugo Faria, Clara de Andrade Pontual Peres, Lubna Al-Sharif, Maria Julia Gonzaga Pascoalin, Fernando Augusto Barreiros, Marina Ayabe Gomes de Moraes
{"title":"Tinidazole vs metronidazole for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Milene Vitória Sampaio Sobral,&nbsp;Victor Gonçalves Soares,&nbsp;João Lucas de Magalhães Leal Moreira,&nbsp;Livia Kneipp Rodrigues,&nbsp;Hilária Saugo Faria,&nbsp;Clara de Andrade Pontual Peres,&nbsp;Lubna Al-Sharif,&nbsp;Maria Julia Gonzaga Pascoalin,&nbsp;Fernando Augusto Barreiros,&nbsp;Marina Ayabe Gomes de Moraes","doi":"10.1007/s00404-024-07899-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Tinidazole shows potential as a first-line treatment for bacterial vaginosis (BV). However, its superiority to metronidazole remains uncertain. Therefore, this meta-analysis compares tinidazole versus metronidazole in patients with BV.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane for studies comparing tinidazole and metronidazole in patients with BV. Statistical analyses were performed using R Studio 4.3.2. Heterogeneity was examined with the Cochran Q test and I<sup>2</sup> statistics. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled across trials. Outcomes of interest were BV cure at the first and the second follow-up appointment, and adverse events such as nausea and bad or metallic taste.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Five randomized controlled trials and 1 prospective observational study, reporting data on 1,036 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Among them, 511 (49%) received tinidazole and 525 (51%) received metronidazole. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 6 weeks. There was no significant difference between groups for BV cure at the first follow-up appointment (RR 1.03; 95% CI 0.92 to 1.14; I<sup>2</sup> = 76%), cure at the second follow-up appointment (RR 1.05; 95% CI 0.80–1.38; I<sup>2</sup> = 88%), nausea (RR 0.89; 95% CI 0.39–2.04; I<sup>2</sup> = 83%), and bad or metallic taste (RR 0.74; 95% CI 0.12–4.45; I<sup>2</sup> = 89%).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In patients with BV, tinidazole and metronidazole exhibit similar efficacy and safety, with equivalent cure rates and incidence of adverse events.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8330,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","volume":"311 2","pages":"333 - 340"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00404-024-07899-z.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00404-024-07899-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Tinidazole shows potential as a first-line treatment for bacterial vaginosis (BV). However, its superiority to metronidazole remains uncertain. Therefore, this meta-analysis compares tinidazole versus metronidazole in patients with BV.

Methods

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane for studies comparing tinidazole and metronidazole in patients with BV. Statistical analyses were performed using R Studio 4.3.2. Heterogeneity was examined with the Cochran Q test and I2 statistics. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled across trials. Outcomes of interest were BV cure at the first and the second follow-up appointment, and adverse events such as nausea and bad or metallic taste.

Results

Five randomized controlled trials and 1 prospective observational study, reporting data on 1,036 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Among them, 511 (49%) received tinidazole and 525 (51%) received metronidazole. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 6 weeks. There was no significant difference between groups for BV cure at the first follow-up appointment (RR 1.03; 95% CI 0.92 to 1.14; I2 = 76%), cure at the second follow-up appointment (RR 1.05; 95% CI 0.80–1.38; I2 = 88%), nausea (RR 0.89; 95% CI 0.39–2.04; I2 = 83%), and bad or metallic taste (RR 0.74; 95% CI 0.12–4.45; I2 = 89%).

Conclusion

In patients with BV, tinidazole and metronidazole exhibit similar efficacy and safety, with equivalent cure rates and incidence of adverse events.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
替硝唑与甲硝唑治疗细菌性阴道病:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
简介:替硝唑显示出作为细菌性阴道病(BV)一线治疗药物的潜力。然而,其相对于甲硝唑的优越性仍不确定。因此,本荟萃分析比较了替硝唑和甲硝唑在BV患者中的疗效。方法:系统检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane,比较替硝唑和甲硝唑在BV患者中的疗效。采用R Studio 4.3.2进行统计分析。采用Cochran Q检验和I2统计量检验异质性。将所有试验的风险比(RR)与95%可信区间(CI)合并。关注的结果是BV在第一次和第二次随访时治愈,以及恶心和不良或金属味等不良事件。结果:本荟萃分析纳入了5项随机对照试验和1项前瞻性观察研究,报告了1036例患者的数据。其中替硝唑511例(49%),甲硝唑525例(51%)。随访1 ~ 6周。第一次随访时,两组间细菌性阴道炎治愈率差异无统计学意义(RR 1.03;95% CI 0.92 ~ 1.14;I2 = 76%),第二次随访时治愈(RR 1.05;95% ci 0.80-1.38;I2 = 88%),恶心(RR 0.89;95% ci 0.39-2.04;I2 = 83%),不良或金属味(RR 0.74;95% ci 0.12-4.45;i2 = 89%)。结论:替硝唑与甲硝唑在BV患者中的疗效和安全性相当,治愈率和不良事件发生率相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
15.40%
发文量
493
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1870 as "Archiv für Gynaekologie", Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics has a long and outstanding tradition. Since 1922 the journal has been the Organ of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. "The Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics" is circulated in over 40 countries world wide and is indexed in "PubMed/Medline" and "Science Citation Index Expanded/Journal Citation Report". The journal publishes invited and submitted reviews; peer-reviewed original articles about clinical topics and basic research as well as news and views and guidelines and position statements from all sub-specialties in gynecology and obstetrics.
期刊最新文献
Predictors of adverse neonatal outcomes in low-risk nulliparous women at term with meconium-stained amniotic fluid. Risk factors for combined vaginal-cesarean delivery in the vertex-vertex twins: a case-control study. Effectiveness of evidence-based nursing protocols in managing postpartum hemorrhage after vaginal delivery: a prospective observational quality-improvement evaluation. Editorial Expression of Concern: Stimulation of the endometrium with high-grade blastocyst culture supernatant (SEHB) can improve pregnancy outcome for couples undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI): a randomized clinical trial. OPM-based fetal magnetocardiography: fetal cardiac time intervals in healthy pregnancies compared to postnatal ECGs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1