A Socio-Ecological Approach to Promoting Physical Activity in a Low-Income Neighborhood: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Health Education & Behavior Pub Date : 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1177/10901981251316858
Navin Kaushal, Rafael A Alamilla, NiCole R Keith
{"title":"A Socio-Ecological Approach to Promoting Physical Activity in a Low-Income Neighborhood: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial.","authors":"Navin Kaushal, Rafael A Alamilla, NiCole R Keith","doi":"10.1177/10901981251316858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Physical activity (PA) helps prevent several diseases; however, individuals residing in low-income neighborhoods have lower PA participation rates due to social disparities, as outlined in the social-ecological model. The purpose of this pilot study was to apply the social-ecological framework to test the effectiveness of a six-month, community-based PA program in a low-income neighborhood. Participants (n = 45) lived in a low-income neighborhood near a community fitness center. Those randomized to the experimental arm (n = 23) received gym access and attended monthly on-site workshops (Months 1-3) designed to enhance PA determinants such as planning and habit formation. The remaining participants (n = 22) were assigned to a wait-listed control group. PA, body composition, and fitness data were collected using accelerometers, BODPOD, and on-site fitness assessments at baseline, Month 3, and Month 6. Compared to the control group, participants in the experimental arm engaged in more moderate-to-vigorous PA (d = .48, d = .74), total PA (d = .41, d = .99), and steps (d = .48, d = .92) at Months 3 and 6, respectively. The experimental group also showed improvements in fitness tests, including the 30-s chair test (d = .29, d = .23) and the 8-foot up-and-go test at Month 3 (d = -.23), though these gains were not sustained at Month 6. Overall, this pilot study supports the feasibility of promoting PA and improving fitness outcomes in a low-income neighborhood. Notes for improvement and future directions are provided such as tracking PA exclusively performed at the community center to better assess program impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":12974,"journal":{"name":"Health Education & Behavior","volume":" ","pages":"10901981251316858"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Education & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10901981251316858","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Physical activity (PA) helps prevent several diseases; however, individuals residing in low-income neighborhoods have lower PA participation rates due to social disparities, as outlined in the social-ecological model. The purpose of this pilot study was to apply the social-ecological framework to test the effectiveness of a six-month, community-based PA program in a low-income neighborhood. Participants (n = 45) lived in a low-income neighborhood near a community fitness center. Those randomized to the experimental arm (n = 23) received gym access and attended monthly on-site workshops (Months 1-3) designed to enhance PA determinants such as planning and habit formation. The remaining participants (n = 22) were assigned to a wait-listed control group. PA, body composition, and fitness data were collected using accelerometers, BODPOD, and on-site fitness assessments at baseline, Month 3, and Month 6. Compared to the control group, participants in the experimental arm engaged in more moderate-to-vigorous PA (d = .48, d = .74), total PA (d = .41, d = .99), and steps (d = .48, d = .92) at Months 3 and 6, respectively. The experimental group also showed improvements in fitness tests, including the 30-s chair test (d = .29, d = .23) and the 8-foot up-and-go test at Month 3 (d = -.23), though these gains were not sustained at Month 6. Overall, this pilot study supports the feasibility of promoting PA and improving fitness outcomes in a low-income neighborhood. Notes for improvement and future directions are provided such as tracking PA exclusively performed at the community center to better assess program impact.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Education & Behavior
Health Education & Behavior PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: Health Education & Behavior is the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education (SOPHE). The journal publishes authoritative and practical information on critical health issues for a broad range of professionals interested in understanding factors associated with health behavior and health status, and strategies to improve social and behavioral health. The journal is interested in articles directed toward researchers and/or practitioners in health behavior and health education. Empirical research, case study, program evaluation, literature reviews, and articles discussing theories are regularly published.
期刊最新文献
A Socio-Ecological Approach to Promoting Physical Activity in a Low-Income Neighborhood: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial. Primary Care Providers' Experiences With an Active Elective Genetic Testing Program. Rethink Recovery: A Qualitative Approach to Exploring Messaging for Medication-Assisted Recovery (MAR). Community Senior Center Intervention to Address Factors Related to Memory Screening Engagement. Concussion Awareness Training Tool for Youth: Impact on Concussion Knowledge, Beliefs, and Reporting Intentions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1