Christopher J Kaperak, John M Flores, Aniruddha Hazra
{"title":"Promises, Pitfalls, and Progress: Doxycycline Prophylaxis for Bacterial Sexually Transmitted Infections.","authors":"Christopher J Kaperak, John M Flores, Aniruddha Hazra","doi":"10.1007/s11904-025-00726-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Doxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis (doxy PEP) has proven to be highly effective in reducing the incidence of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) among men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women. In response, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued official clinical guidance on the use of doxy PEP as a preventive intervention in these populations. However, despite strong evidence supporting its use, the potential risks of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) along with its limited accessibility in other key populations, remain significant concerns with doxy PEP.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Real-world data show strong awareness, interest, and usage of doxy PEP among MSM and transwomen. Early ecological studies have revealed population-level reductions in chlamydia and early syphilis incidence following doxy PEP implementation. Ongoing research continues to explore its efficacy in other populations, as well as its impact on both individual and population-level AMR. Doxy PEP is a well-tolerated and inexpensive intervention that has the potential to substantially reduce bacterial STIs, particularly in priority populations. Its implementation will require careful assessment of equitable uptake, usage patterns, and long-term monitoring of STI incidence and AMR.</p>","PeriodicalId":10930,"journal":{"name":"Current HIV/AIDS Reports","volume":"22 1","pages":"16"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current HIV/AIDS Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11904-025-00726-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose of review: Doxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis (doxy PEP) has proven to be highly effective in reducing the incidence of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) among men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women. In response, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued official clinical guidance on the use of doxy PEP as a preventive intervention in these populations. However, despite strong evidence supporting its use, the potential risks of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) along with its limited accessibility in other key populations, remain significant concerns with doxy PEP.
Recent findings: Real-world data show strong awareness, interest, and usage of doxy PEP among MSM and transwomen. Early ecological studies have revealed population-level reductions in chlamydia and early syphilis incidence following doxy PEP implementation. Ongoing research continues to explore its efficacy in other populations, as well as its impact on both individual and population-level AMR. Doxy PEP is a well-tolerated and inexpensive intervention that has the potential to substantially reduce bacterial STIs, particularly in priority populations. Its implementation will require careful assessment of equitable uptake, usage patterns, and long-term monitoring of STI incidence and AMR.
期刊介绍:
This journal intends to provide clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts that review the most important, recently published clinical findings related to the diagnosis, treatment, management, and prevention of HIV/AIDS.
We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as antiretroviral therapies, behavioral aspects of management, and metabolic complications and comorbidity. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. Commentaries from well-known figures in the field are also provided.