How much deforestation in sub-Saharan Africa has been caused by mining?

IF 4.4 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Biological Conservation Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-20 DOI:10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111040
Abdulkareem I. Ahmed , Mike R. Massam , Robert G. Bryant , David P. Edwards
{"title":"How much deforestation in sub-Saharan Africa has been caused by mining?","authors":"Abdulkareem I. Ahmed ,&nbsp;Mike R. Massam ,&nbsp;Robert G. Bryant ,&nbsp;David P. Edwards","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) has emerged as a prominent destination for mining activities due to its abundant mineral reserves. A key question is understanding the extent to which the establishment and expansion of mines contribute to off-site forest disruptions. We conducted a comparative analysis by examining deforestation within a 1 km to 12 km buffer from the boundary of mines (treatments; i.e., 1–3 km, 3–6 km, 6–9 km, 9–12 km), and similar locations without mines (controls) but with comparable environmental characteristics. The rates of annual change were evaluated between treatments and controls, and before and after the establishment of mines from 2001 to 2020. The sampled treatment grids had a total of 6,633,876 ha of tree cover in year 2000, and lost 17.7 % within 2 decades, this was 47.5 % higher than the matched controls. Deforestation rates increased by 11,200 ha annually for mines established between 2009 and 2011 (the median years), relative to pre-creation of mines. Before mines were created, the average annual deforestation rate was 1665 ha, increasing 2.6-fold (4314 ha per year) following the creation of the mines. Our findings emphasize the urgent need for the mining sector to consider their broader offsite environmental costs in their impact assessments, carbon accounting, and associated investments in conservation protection.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55375,"journal":{"name":"Biological Conservation","volume":"304 ","pages":"Article 111040"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320725000771","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) has emerged as a prominent destination for mining activities due to its abundant mineral reserves. A key question is understanding the extent to which the establishment and expansion of mines contribute to off-site forest disruptions. We conducted a comparative analysis by examining deforestation within a 1 km to 12 km buffer from the boundary of mines (treatments; i.e., 1–3 km, 3–6 km, 6–9 km, 9–12 km), and similar locations without mines (controls) but with comparable environmental characteristics. The rates of annual change were evaluated between treatments and controls, and before and after the establishment of mines from 2001 to 2020. The sampled treatment grids had a total of 6,633,876 ha of tree cover in year 2000, and lost 17.7 % within 2 decades, this was 47.5 % higher than the matched controls. Deforestation rates increased by 11,200 ha annually for mines established between 2009 and 2011 (the median years), relative to pre-creation of mines. Before mines were created, the average annual deforestation rate was 1665 ha, increasing 2.6-fold (4314 ha per year) following the creation of the mines. Our findings emphasize the urgent need for the mining sector to consider their broader offsite environmental costs in their impact assessments, carbon accounting, and associated investments in conservation protection.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
撒哈拉以南非洲有多少森林砍伐是由采矿造成的?
撒哈拉以南非洲(SSA)由于其丰富的矿产储量,已成为采矿活动的重要目的地。一个关键的问题是了解矿井的建立和扩大在多大程度上造成场外森林的破坏。我们通过检查距离矿山边界1公里至12公里缓冲区内的森林砍伐情况进行了比较分析(处理;例如,1-3公里、3-6公里、6-9公里、9-12公里)和类似地点,没有地雷(控制),但具有可比的环境特征。评价了2001 - 2020年治理前后、治理前后的年变化率。2000年,采样处理网格的树木覆盖面积为6,633,876公顷,在20年内损失了17.7%,比匹配对照高出47.5%。与未建矿相比,2009年至2011年(中位数年份)建矿的森林砍伐率每年增加11200公顷。在建立地雷之前,年平均毁林率为1665公顷,在建立地雷之后增加了2.6倍(每年4314公顷)。我们的研究结果强调,矿业部门迫切需要在其影响评估、碳核算和相关保护投资中考虑其更广泛的场外环境成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biological Conservation
Biological Conservation 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
295
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Biological Conservation is an international leading journal in the discipline of conservation biology. The journal publishes articles spanning a diverse range of fields that contribute to the biological, sociological, and economic dimensions of conservation and natural resource management. The primary aim of Biological Conservation is the publication of high-quality papers that advance the science and practice of conservation, or which demonstrate the application of conservation principles for natural resource management and policy. Therefore it will be of interest to a broad international readership.
期刊最新文献
Beyond species richness: Habitat fragmentation reduces community occupancy and functional richness of mountain forest mammals Global forests risk to climate and land-use change Introduced species are a global threat to lizard biodiversity NATURA 2000: Synergies and trade-offs between process-oriented conservation and the protection of threatened species Estimating wolf population size in France using non-invasive genetic sampling and spatial capture-recapture models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1