Identifying priority conservation areas based on systematic conservation planning analysis in the Loess Plateau, China

IF 3.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Global Ecology and Conservation Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1016/j.gecco.2025.e03495
Le Hui , Hao Wang , Jiamin Liu , Xin Ye , Binyao Han , Yongqiang Xia , Liwei Zhang , Lei Jiao
{"title":"Identifying priority conservation areas based on systematic conservation planning analysis in the Loess Plateau, China","authors":"Le Hui ,&nbsp;Hao Wang ,&nbsp;Jiamin Liu ,&nbsp;Xin Ye ,&nbsp;Binyao Han ,&nbsp;Yongqiang Xia ,&nbsp;Liwei Zhang ,&nbsp;Lei Jiao","doi":"10.1016/j.gecco.2025.e03495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The conservation areas planning work has been carried out in the Loess Plateau (LP), but there is still insufficient attention paid to ecosystem services conservation. This study simulated four ecological conservation scenarios, considering the ecological status and economic benefits. The conservation targets were set to protect 20 % - 40 % ecosystem service, and the Marxan model and comprehensive effectiveness of spatial constraints (CESP) index were used to identify the optimal distribution of conservation areas. Results showed that: (1) In the minimum cost scenario, the conservation areas were mainly distributed in the northwest of LP, where human activities were sparse. The conservation areas in the other three scenarios were distributed in most areas of southeast, where some ecological protection projects have been implemented. (2) Aiming to protect 20 % ecosystem services, the balanced scenario represents the optimal distribution of conservation areas, featuring the highest CESP index (64.01) and covering a conservation area of 9.44 × 10<sup>4</sup> km<sup>2</sup>. When the conservation target was set to 30 % and 40 %, the social benefits scenario provided the most effective distribution of conservation areas. This study analyzed the conservation area construction from the perspective of ecosystem services protection, providing a scientific basis for future conservation area planning in the region.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54264,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Conservation","volume":"58 ","pages":"Article e03495"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989425000964","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The conservation areas planning work has been carried out in the Loess Plateau (LP), but there is still insufficient attention paid to ecosystem services conservation. This study simulated four ecological conservation scenarios, considering the ecological status and economic benefits. The conservation targets were set to protect 20 % - 40 % ecosystem service, and the Marxan model and comprehensive effectiveness of spatial constraints (CESP) index were used to identify the optimal distribution of conservation areas. Results showed that: (1) In the minimum cost scenario, the conservation areas were mainly distributed in the northwest of LP, where human activities were sparse. The conservation areas in the other three scenarios were distributed in most areas of southeast, where some ecological protection projects have been implemented. (2) Aiming to protect 20 % ecosystem services, the balanced scenario represents the optimal distribution of conservation areas, featuring the highest CESP index (64.01) and covering a conservation area of 9.44 × 104 km2. When the conservation target was set to 30 % and 40 %, the social benefits scenario provided the most effective distribution of conservation areas. This study analyzed the conservation area construction from the perspective of ecosystem services protection, providing a scientific basis for future conservation area planning in the region.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于系统保护规划分析的黄土高原重点保护区确定
黄土高原自然保护区规划工作已经开展,但对生态系统服务功能保护的重视程度还不够。考虑生态现状和经济效益,模拟了四种生态保护情景。将保护目标设定为保护20% % ~ 40% %的生态系统服务,并利用马克思模型和空间约束综合有效性指数(CESP)确定保护区的最佳分布。结果表明:(1)最小成本情景下,保护区主要分布在低海拔地区西北部,人类活动较少;其他三种情景的保护区分布在东南部大部分地区,这些地区已经实施了一些生态保护工程。(2)以保护20 %的生态系统服务功能为目标,平衡情景是保护区的最优分布,CESP指数最高(64.01),保护区面积为9.44 × 104 km2。当保护目标设定为30% %和40% %时,社会效益情景提供了最有效的保护区分布。本研究从生态系统服务保护的角度对保护区建设进行分析,为今后该地区保护区规划提供科学依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Ecology and Conservation
Global Ecology and Conservation Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
346
审稿时长
83 days
期刊介绍: Global Ecology and Conservation is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal covering all sub-disciplines of ecological and conservation science: from theory to practice, from molecules to ecosystems, from regional to global. The fields covered include: organismal, population, community, and ecosystem ecology; physiological, evolutionary, and behavioral ecology; and conservation science.
期刊最新文献
Mapping knowledge and conservation gaps in Atlantic nurse shark research: A global North-South perspective Climate shapes biodiversity–mycorrhiza interactions to control forest carbon DNA macrobarcoding reveals seasonal differences and spatial heterogeneity in the diet of Chinese Milu (Elaphurus davidianus) in China Multi-source captive breeding maintains nuclear genetic diversity in Alpine musk deer (Moschus chrysogaster) despite severe mitochondrial erosion What helps in the short term may hinder later: High grass abundance caused by the sowing of a competitive grass species limits meadow steppic grassland regeneration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1