Identifying priority conservation areas based on systematic conservation planning analysis in the Loess Plateau, China

IF 3.5 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Global Ecology and Conservation Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1016/j.gecco.2025.e03495
Le Hui , Hao Wang , Jiamin Liu , Xin Ye , Binyao Han , Yongqiang Xia , Liwei Zhang , Lei Jiao
{"title":"Identifying priority conservation areas based on systematic conservation planning analysis in the Loess Plateau, China","authors":"Le Hui ,&nbsp;Hao Wang ,&nbsp;Jiamin Liu ,&nbsp;Xin Ye ,&nbsp;Binyao Han ,&nbsp;Yongqiang Xia ,&nbsp;Liwei Zhang ,&nbsp;Lei Jiao","doi":"10.1016/j.gecco.2025.e03495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The conservation areas planning work has been carried out in the Loess Plateau (LP), but there is still insufficient attention paid to ecosystem services conservation. This study simulated four ecological conservation scenarios, considering the ecological status and economic benefits. The conservation targets were set to protect 20 % - 40 % ecosystem service, and the Marxan model and comprehensive effectiveness of spatial constraints (CESP) index were used to identify the optimal distribution of conservation areas. Results showed that: (1) In the minimum cost scenario, the conservation areas were mainly distributed in the northwest of LP, where human activities were sparse. The conservation areas in the other three scenarios were distributed in most areas of southeast, where some ecological protection projects have been implemented. (2) Aiming to protect 20 % ecosystem services, the balanced scenario represents the optimal distribution of conservation areas, featuring the highest CESP index (64.01) and covering a conservation area of 9.44 × 10<sup>4</sup> km<sup>2</sup>. When the conservation target was set to 30 % and 40 %, the social benefits scenario provided the most effective distribution of conservation areas. This study analyzed the conservation area construction from the perspective of ecosystem services protection, providing a scientific basis for future conservation area planning in the region.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54264,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Conservation","volume":"58 ","pages":"Article e03495"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989425000964","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The conservation areas planning work has been carried out in the Loess Plateau (LP), but there is still insufficient attention paid to ecosystem services conservation. This study simulated four ecological conservation scenarios, considering the ecological status and economic benefits. The conservation targets were set to protect 20 % - 40 % ecosystem service, and the Marxan model and comprehensive effectiveness of spatial constraints (CESP) index were used to identify the optimal distribution of conservation areas. Results showed that: (1) In the minimum cost scenario, the conservation areas were mainly distributed in the northwest of LP, where human activities were sparse. The conservation areas in the other three scenarios were distributed in most areas of southeast, where some ecological protection projects have been implemented. (2) Aiming to protect 20 % ecosystem services, the balanced scenario represents the optimal distribution of conservation areas, featuring the highest CESP index (64.01) and covering a conservation area of 9.44 × 104 km2. When the conservation target was set to 30 % and 40 %, the social benefits scenario provided the most effective distribution of conservation areas. This study analyzed the conservation area construction from the perspective of ecosystem services protection, providing a scientific basis for future conservation area planning in the region.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Ecology and Conservation
Global Ecology and Conservation Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
346
审稿时长
83 days
期刊介绍: Global Ecology and Conservation is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal covering all sub-disciplines of ecological and conservation science: from theory to practice, from molecules to ecosystems, from regional to global. The fields covered include: organismal, population, community, and ecosystem ecology; physiological, evolutionary, and behavioral ecology; and conservation science.
期刊最新文献
Indigenous Lands inhibit mining-induced deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon Calcium carbonate content for two morphotypes of an indicator charophyte species across a depth and light gradient in a mesotrophic lake Mapping suitable habitat and Anthropocene refugia for Ethiopian Guerezas: Insights for their conservation Landscape features outside the airport exerted direct and indirect impact on bird community characteristics inside the airport Three decades of the practice of decentralised forest management in Africa: A systematic review of current knowledge and prospects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1