Local anesthetics and antibiotics display synergistic and antagonistic drug interactions against pathogens causing septic arthritis in horses.

IF 1.4 3区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES American journal of veterinary research Pub Date : 2025-02-19 Print Date: 2025-05-01 DOI:10.2460/ajvr.24.08.0214
Ditte M T Adler, Ane T Nielsen, Christine Olsen, Denis Verwilghen, Peter Damborg, Rikke H Olsen
{"title":"Local anesthetics and antibiotics display synergistic and antagonistic drug interactions against pathogens causing septic arthritis in horses.","authors":"Ditte M T Adler, Ane T Nielsen, Christine Olsen, Denis Verwilghen, Peter Damborg, Rikke H Olsen","doi":"10.2460/ajvr.24.08.0214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the in vitro efficacy of antibiotics (amikacin, ceftiofur, and gentamicin) in combination with local anesthetics (LAs; bupivacaine hydrochloride, lidocaine hydrochloride, and mepivacaine hydrochloride), a combination commonly performed for IA injectate and regional limb perfusion (RLP) in horses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>17 equine clinical isolates were tested by the checkerboard method for their minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) against a combination of concentrations of LAs and antibiotics from August 2020 through December 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the majority of combinations, the antibiotic efficacy was not affected. However, in a subset of combinations (n = 70), the addition of LA to the antibiotic solution displayed a synergistic (n = 14) or antagonistic (n = 56) effect, indicating that LA increased or decreased antibiotic activity, respectively. Increased MICs seen in most antagonistic combinations appeared to be without clinical relevance as MICs remained below or above clinically achievable concentrations. In contrast, antagonism observed for aminoglycoside-LA combinations resulted in MICs higher than the concentration achievable by RLP. In some synergistic combinations, MICs decreased from markedly above to below or near clinically achievable concentrations against a specific antibiotic.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The addition of LAs to antibiotic solutions for IA injections does not compromise the in vitro antibiotic effect. Conversely, the addition for RLPs compromises the in vitro antibiotic effect at clinical concentrations.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>This in vitro study suggests that LAs can be added to IA antibiotic solutions without compromising antibiotic effects against common equine pathogens. For RLP, the combination of tested aminoglycosides (amikacin and gentamicin) and LAs is discouraged without taking into account MICs of antimicrobial susceptibility testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":7754,"journal":{"name":"American journal of veterinary research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of veterinary research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.24.08.0214","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the in vitro efficacy of antibiotics (amikacin, ceftiofur, and gentamicin) in combination with local anesthetics (LAs; bupivacaine hydrochloride, lidocaine hydrochloride, and mepivacaine hydrochloride), a combination commonly performed for IA injectate and regional limb perfusion (RLP) in horses.

Methods: 17 equine clinical isolates were tested by the checkerboard method for their minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) against a combination of concentrations of LAs and antibiotics from August 2020 through December 2023.

Results: For the majority of combinations, the antibiotic efficacy was not affected. However, in a subset of combinations (n = 70), the addition of LA to the antibiotic solution displayed a synergistic (n = 14) or antagonistic (n = 56) effect, indicating that LA increased or decreased antibiotic activity, respectively. Increased MICs seen in most antagonistic combinations appeared to be without clinical relevance as MICs remained below or above clinically achievable concentrations. In contrast, antagonism observed for aminoglycoside-LA combinations resulted in MICs higher than the concentration achievable by RLP. In some synergistic combinations, MICs decreased from markedly above to below or near clinically achievable concentrations against a specific antibiotic.

Conclusions: The addition of LAs to antibiotic solutions for IA injections does not compromise the in vitro antibiotic effect. Conversely, the addition for RLPs compromises the in vitro antibiotic effect at clinical concentrations.

Clinical relevance: This in vitro study suggests that LAs can be added to IA antibiotic solutions without compromising antibiotic effects against common equine pathogens. For RLP, the combination of tested aminoglycosides (amikacin and gentamicin) and LAs is discouraged without taking into account MICs of antimicrobial susceptibility testing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
局部麻醉剂和抗生素显示协同和拮抗药物相互作用对病原体引起败血性关节炎马。
目的:探讨抗生素(阿米卡星、头孢替福、庆大霉素)与局麻药(LAs;盐酸布比卡因,盐酸利多卡因和盐酸甲哌卡因),通常用于IA注射和马局部肢体灌注(RLP)。方法:2020年8月至2023年12月,采用棋盘法检测17株马临床分离株对LAs和抗生素联合浓度的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)。结果:大多数联合用药对抗菌效果无影响。然而,在一些组合(n = 70)中,向抗生素溶液中添加LA显示出协同(n = 14)或拮抗(n = 56)效应,表明LA分别增加或降低了抗生素活性。在大多数拮抗剂组合中观察到的mic升高似乎没有临床相关性,因为mic仍然低于或高于临床可达到的浓度。相反,氨基糖苷- la联合拮抗作用导致mic高于RLP可达到的浓度。在一些协同组合中,针对特定抗生素的mic浓度从明显高于或低于或接近临床可达到的浓度。结论:在IA注射用抗生素溶液中加入LAs不影响体外抗菌效果。相反,添加rlp会损害临床浓度下的体外抗生素效果。临床意义:这项体外研究表明,LAs可以添加到IA抗生素溶液中,而不会影响对常见马病原体的抗生素效果。对于RLP,不建议将所测氨基糖苷(阿米卡星和庆大霉素)与LAs联合使用,而不考虑抗菌药敏试验的mic。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
186
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Veterinary Research supports the collaborative exchange of information between researchers and clinicians by publishing novel research findings that bridge the gulf between basic research and clinical practice or that help to translate laboratory research and preclinical studies to the development of clinical trials and clinical practice. The journal welcomes submission of high-quality original studies and review articles in a wide range of scientific fields, including anatomy, anesthesiology, animal welfare, behavior, epidemiology, genetics, heredity, infectious disease, molecular biology, oncology, pharmacology, pathogenic mechanisms, physiology, surgery, theriogenology, toxicology, and vaccinology. Species of interest include production animals, companion animals, equids, exotic animals, birds, reptiles, and wild and marine animals. Reports of laboratory animal studies and studies involving the use of animals as experimental models of human diseases are considered only when the study results are of demonstrable benefit to the species used in the research or to another species of veterinary interest. Other fields of interest or animals species are not necessarily excluded from consideration, but such reports must focus on novel research findings. Submitted papers must make an original and substantial contribution to the veterinary medicine knowledge base; preliminary studies are not appropriate.
期刊最新文献
Aquatic animal health research enabled by biosecure hatchery and experimental fish facilities. A 2-day intensive research training program improves research self-efficacy but not research anxiety in North American private practice veterinary postgraduate clinical trainees. Beyond "soft skills"-the evidence behind strong veterinary communication. Fracturoscopy is comparable to fluoroscopy for intraoperative assessment of fracture apposition during indirect reduction of simulated diaphyseal antebrachial fractures in dog cadavers. Werling Center expands Purdue's comparative oncology leadership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1