Risk of aortic aneurysm or dissection following use of fluoroquinolones: a retrospective multinational network cohort study.

IF 10 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL EClinicalMedicine Pub Date : 2025-02-01 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103096
Jack L Janetzki, Jung Ho Kim, Evan Minty, Jung Ah Lee, Daniel R Morales, Rohan Khera, Chungsoo Kim, Thamir M Alshammari, Scott L DuVall, Michael E Matheny, Thomas Falconer, Seonji Kim, Thanh-Phuc Phan, Phung-Anh Nguyen, Min-Huei Hsu, Jason C Hsu, Rae Woong Park, Kenneth K C Man, Sarah Seager, Mui Van Zandt, James P Gilbert, Patrick B Ryan, Martijn J Schuemie, Marc A Suchard, George Hripcsak, Nicole Pratt, Seng Chan You
{"title":"Risk of aortic aneurysm or dissection following use of fluoroquinolones: a retrospective multinational network cohort study.","authors":"Jack L Janetzki, Jung Ho Kim, Evan Minty, Jung Ah Lee, Daniel R Morales, Rohan Khera, Chungsoo Kim, Thamir M Alshammari, Scott L DuVall, Michael E Matheny, Thomas Falconer, Seonji Kim, Thanh-Phuc Phan, Phung-Anh Nguyen, Min-Huei Hsu, Jason C Hsu, Rae Woong Park, Kenneth K C Man, Sarah Seager, Mui Van Zandt, James P Gilbert, Patrick B Ryan, Martijn J Schuemie, Marc A Suchard, George Hripcsak, Nicole Pratt, Seng Chan You","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fluoroquinolones (FQs) are commonly used to treat urinary tract infections (UTIs), but some studies have suggested they may increase the risk of aortic aneurysm or dissection (AA/AD). However, no large-scale international study has thoroughly assessed this risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted using a large, distributed network analysis across 14 databases from 5 countries (United States, South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, and Australia). The study included 13,588,837 patients aged 35 or older who initiated systemic fluoroquinolones (FQs) or comparable antibiotics (trimethoprim with or without sulfamethoxazole [TMP] or cephalosporins [CPHs]) for UTI treatment in the outpatient setting between JAN 01, 2010 and DEC 31, 2019. Patients were included if at the index date they had at least 365 days of prior observation and were not hospitalised for any reason on or within 7 days prior to the index date. The primary outcome was AA/AD occurrence within 60 days of exposure, with secondary outcomes examining AA and AD separately. Cox proportional hazards models with 1:1 propensity score (PS) matching were used to estimate the risk, with results calibrated using negative control outcomes. Analyses were subjected to pre-defined study diagnostics, and only those passing all diagnostics were reported. Hazard ratios (HRs) were pooled using Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Among analyses that passed diagnostics there were 1,954,798 and 1,195,962 propensity-matched pairs for the FQ versus TMP and FQ versus CPH comparisons respectively. For the 60-day follow-up there was no difference in risk of AA/AD between FQ and TMP (absolute rate difference [ARD], 0.21 per 1000 person-year; calibrated HR, 0.91 [95% CI 0.73-1.10]). There was no significant difference in risk for FQ versus CPH (ARD, 0.11 per 1000 person-year; calibrated HR, 1.01 [95% CI 0.82-1.25]).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>This large-scale study used a rigorous design with objective diagnostics to address bias and confounding. There was no increased risk of AA/AD associated with FQ compared to TMP or CPH in patients treated for UTI in the outpatient setting. As we only examined FQ used to treat UTIs in the outpatient setting, the results may not be generalisable to other indications with different severity.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Yonsei University College of Medicine, Government-wide R&D Fund project for infectious disease research (GFID), Republic of Korea, National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Australian Government. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Informatics and Computing Infrastructure (VINCI), Department of Veterans Affairs, the United States Government.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"81 ","pages":"103096"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11836508/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EClinicalMedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103096","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fluoroquinolones (FQs) are commonly used to treat urinary tract infections (UTIs), but some studies have suggested they may increase the risk of aortic aneurysm or dissection (AA/AD). However, no large-scale international study has thoroughly assessed this risk.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using a large, distributed network analysis across 14 databases from 5 countries (United States, South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, and Australia). The study included 13,588,837 patients aged 35 or older who initiated systemic fluoroquinolones (FQs) or comparable antibiotics (trimethoprim with or without sulfamethoxazole [TMP] or cephalosporins [CPHs]) for UTI treatment in the outpatient setting between JAN 01, 2010 and DEC 31, 2019. Patients were included if at the index date they had at least 365 days of prior observation and were not hospitalised for any reason on or within 7 days prior to the index date. The primary outcome was AA/AD occurrence within 60 days of exposure, with secondary outcomes examining AA and AD separately. Cox proportional hazards models with 1:1 propensity score (PS) matching were used to estimate the risk, with results calibrated using negative control outcomes. Analyses were subjected to pre-defined study diagnostics, and only those passing all diagnostics were reported. Hazard ratios (HRs) were pooled using Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis.

Findings: Among analyses that passed diagnostics there were 1,954,798 and 1,195,962 propensity-matched pairs for the FQ versus TMP and FQ versus CPH comparisons respectively. For the 60-day follow-up there was no difference in risk of AA/AD between FQ and TMP (absolute rate difference [ARD], 0.21 per 1000 person-year; calibrated HR, 0.91 [95% CI 0.73-1.10]). There was no significant difference in risk for FQ versus CPH (ARD, 0.11 per 1000 person-year; calibrated HR, 1.01 [95% CI 0.82-1.25]).

Interpretation: This large-scale study used a rigorous design with objective diagnostics to address bias and confounding. There was no increased risk of AA/AD associated with FQ compared to TMP or CPH in patients treated for UTI in the outpatient setting. As we only examined FQ used to treat UTIs in the outpatient setting, the results may not be generalisable to other indications with different severity.

Funding: Yonsei University College of Medicine, Government-wide R&D Fund project for infectious disease research (GFID), Republic of Korea, National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Australian Government. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Informatics and Computing Infrastructure (VINCI), Department of Veterans Affairs, the United States Government.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用氟喹诺酮类药物后发生主动脉瘤或夹层的风险:一项回顾性跨国网络队列研究
背景:氟喹诺酮类药物(FQs)通常用于治疗尿路感染(uti),但一些研究表明它们可能增加主动脉瘤或夹层(AA/AD)的风险。然而,目前还没有大规模的国际研究对这种风险进行全面评估。该研究纳入了2010年1月1日至2019年12月31日期间在门诊接受系统性氟喹诺酮类药物(FQs)或类似抗生素(甲氧苄啶加或不加磺胺甲恶唑[TMP]或头孢菌素[CPHs])治疗的13588,837例35岁及以上患者。如果患者在索引日期之前至少有365天的观察,并且在索引日期之前或之前7天内没有因任何原因住院,则纳入患者。主要结局是暴露60天内发生AA/AD,次要结局分别检查AA和AD。使用1:1倾向评分(PS)匹配的Cox比例风险模型来估计风险,并使用阴性对照结果校准结果。分析服从预先定义的研究诊断,只有通过所有诊断的分析才被报告。采用贝叶斯随机效应荟萃分析合并风险比(hr)。结果:在通过诊断的分析中,FQ与TMP和FQ与CPH的比较分别有1,954,798和1,195,962对倾向匹配。在60天的随访中,FQ和TMP之间AA/AD的风险没有差异(绝对比率差异[ARD], 0.21 / 1000人年;校正后的HR为0.91 [95% CI 0.73-1.10])。FQ与CPH的风险无显著差异(ARD为0.11 / 1000人/年;校正后的HR, 1.01 [95% CI 0.82-1.25])。解释:这项大规模研究采用了严格的设计和客观的诊断来解决偏倚和混淆。与TMP或CPH相比,在门诊接受UTI治疗的患者与FQ相关的AA/AD风险没有增加。由于我们只在门诊检查了用于治疗尿路感染的FQ,结果可能无法推广到其他不同严重程度的适应症。资助:延世大学医学院,传染病研究政府研发基金项目(GFID),大韩民国,国家卫生和医学研究委员会(NHMRC)澳大利亚政府。退伍军人事务部(VA)信息和计算基础设施(VINCI),退伍军人事务部,美国政府。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
EClinicalMedicine
EClinicalMedicine Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
1.30%
发文量
506
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: eClinicalMedicine is a gold open-access clinical journal designed to support frontline health professionals in addressing the complex and rapid health transitions affecting societies globally. The journal aims to assist practitioners in overcoming healthcare challenges across diverse communities, spanning diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and health promotion. Integrating disciplines from various specialties and life stages, it seeks to enhance health systems as fundamental institutions within societies. With a forward-thinking approach, eClinicalMedicine aims to redefine the future of healthcare.
期刊最新文献
Association of intraoperative dexamethasone administration with postoperative delirium and the role of hyperglycaemia: a retrospective cohort study. Joint associations of device-measured step count and sleep duration with incident major adverse cardiovascular events: prospective analysis of the UK Biobank. The sensitivity of patient-reported outcome measures in surgical and non-surgical care: a systematic review and meta-epidemiological evaluation of randomised controlled trials. Solvent-based or nab-paclitaxel plus ramucirumab for pretreated gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination and prespecified biomarker analysis (P-SELECT/WJOG10617G): a randomised phase 2 trial in Japan. Safety and immunogenicity of bivalent RSVpreF vaccine formulated in a multidose vial in healthy female participants in the USA: a multicentre, randomised, open-label, noninferiority phase 3 study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1