BRCA mutation testing and association with oncologic outcome and incidence of ovarian cancer in Norway.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY International Journal of Gynecological Cancer Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-17 DOI:10.1016/j.ijgc.2024.100029
Alda Birgisdóttir, Tor Åge Myklebust, Merete Bjørnslett, Vibeke W Rognlien, Torbjorn Paulsen, Anne Dørum
{"title":"BRCA mutation testing and association with oncologic outcome and incidence of ovarian cancer in Norway.","authors":"Alda Birgisdóttir, Tor Åge Myklebust, Merete Bjørnslett, Vibeke W Rognlien, Torbjorn Paulsen, Anne Dørum","doi":"10.1016/j.ijgc.2024.100029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to explore the frequency of BRCA mutations and testing, age at diagnosis, and incidence of ovarian cancer and to describe oncologic outcomes in patients carrying BRCA mutation compared with those not carrying mutation, in 1 cancer center that covers two-thirds of the Norwegian population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with ovarian cancer treated at Oslo University Hospital-Radiumhospital 2008-2019 who accepted BRCA testing were prospectively registered in the study. Patients carrying mutation and their families received genetic counseling and risk-reducing surgery. For patients treated from 2014 to 2019 (N = 1032), detailed clinicopathologic data (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage, histopathology, type of surgery, residual disease, chemotherapy, first recurrence, and survival) were obtained. Overall and progression-free survival were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regressions. Linear trends were assessed using linear regressions. Using data delivered by the Cancer Registry of Norway, we assessed ovarian cancer incidence in the uptake area of Oslo University Hospital-Radiumhospital throughout the study period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1579 patients were registered. Throughout the study period, BRCA mutation frequency was decreasing, from 14.5% to 6.8%, and mean age at diagnosis increasing, from 59.4 to 63.8 years, in 2008 and 2019, respectively. Patients carrying BRCA1 mutation were younger at diagnosis than were patients carrying BRCA2 mutation and those not carrying mutation. Patients carrying BRCA mutation had almost exclusively high-grade serous histology, and had more often advanced disease and higher cancer antigen 125 levels at the time of diagnosis and were more often treated with interval debulking surgery than were those not carrying mutation. Patients carrying BRCA2 mutation had better overall survival than did those not carrying mutation. The incidence rate of ovarian cancer was decreasing throughout the study, from 22 to 18 per 100,000 person-years in 2008 and 2019, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BRCA mutation testing in patients with ovarian cancer has become more widely incorporated into clinical practice over time, owing to its importance for prognosis and for risk-reducing measures in the families of patients carrying mutation, and possibly contributes to a decrease in ovarian cancer incidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":14097,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","volume":"35 2","pages":"100029"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgc.2024.100029","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to explore the frequency of BRCA mutations and testing, age at diagnosis, and incidence of ovarian cancer and to describe oncologic outcomes in patients carrying BRCA mutation compared with those not carrying mutation, in 1 cancer center that covers two-thirds of the Norwegian population.

Methods: Patients with ovarian cancer treated at Oslo University Hospital-Radiumhospital 2008-2019 who accepted BRCA testing were prospectively registered in the study. Patients carrying mutation and their families received genetic counseling and risk-reducing surgery. For patients treated from 2014 to 2019 (N = 1032), detailed clinicopathologic data (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage, histopathology, type of surgery, residual disease, chemotherapy, first recurrence, and survival) were obtained. Overall and progression-free survival were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regressions. Linear trends were assessed using linear regressions. Using data delivered by the Cancer Registry of Norway, we assessed ovarian cancer incidence in the uptake area of Oslo University Hospital-Radiumhospital throughout the study period.

Results: A total of 1579 patients were registered. Throughout the study period, BRCA mutation frequency was decreasing, from 14.5% to 6.8%, and mean age at diagnosis increasing, from 59.4 to 63.8 years, in 2008 and 2019, respectively. Patients carrying BRCA1 mutation were younger at diagnosis than were patients carrying BRCA2 mutation and those not carrying mutation. Patients carrying BRCA mutation had almost exclusively high-grade serous histology, and had more often advanced disease and higher cancer antigen 125 levels at the time of diagnosis and were more often treated with interval debulking surgery than were those not carrying mutation. Patients carrying BRCA2 mutation had better overall survival than did those not carrying mutation. The incidence rate of ovarian cancer was decreasing throughout the study, from 22 to 18 per 100,000 person-years in 2008 and 2019, respectively.

Conclusion: BRCA mutation testing in patients with ovarian cancer has become more widely incorporated into clinical practice over time, owing to its importance for prognosis and for risk-reducing measures in the families of patients carrying mutation, and possibly contributes to a decrease in ovarian cancer incidence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
挪威BRCA突变检测及其与卵巢癌预后和发病率的关系
目的:本研究旨在探讨BRCA突变和检测的频率、诊断时的年龄和卵巢癌的发病率,并描述BRCA突变患者与非突变患者的肿瘤预后,该研究覆盖了挪威三分之二的人口。方法:将2008-2019年在奥斯陆大学radiumhospital医院接受BRCA检测的卵巢癌患者前瞻性登记入组。携带突变的患者及其家人接受了遗传咨询和降低风险的手术。对2014 - 2019年治疗的患者(N = 1032),获得详细的临床病理资料(国际妇产科联合会分期、组织病理学、手术类型、残留病、化疗、首次复发、生存期)。采用Kaplan-Meier曲线和Cox回归分析总生存率和无进展生存率。使用线性回归评估线性趋势。使用挪威癌症登记处提供的数据,我们评估了整个研究期间奥斯陆大学医院-镭医院摄取区的卵巢癌发病率。结果:共登记1579例患者。在整个研究期间,2008年和2019年,BRCA突变频率分别从14.5%下降到6.8%,平均诊断年龄分别从59.4岁上升到63.8岁。携带BRCA1突变的患者在诊断时比携带BRCA2突变和不携带BRCA2突变的患者更年轻。携带BRCA突变的患者几乎完全具有高级别浆液组织学,并且在诊断时更常发生晚期疾病和更高的癌症抗原125水平,并且比不携带突变的患者更常接受间隔减容手术治疗。携带BRCA2突变的患者比不携带突变的患者有更好的总生存率。在整个研究过程中,卵巢癌的发病率一直在下降,分别在2008年和2019年从每10万人中22人下降到18人。结论:随着时间的推移,卵巢癌患者的BRCA突变检测已越来越广泛地纳入临床实践,因为它对携带突变的患者家庭的预后和降低风险措施具有重要意义,并可能有助于降低卵巢癌的发病率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
280
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, the official journal of the International Gynecologic Cancer Society and the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, is the primary educational and informational publication for topics relevant to detection, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of gynecologic malignancies. IJGC emphasizes a multidisciplinary approach, and includes original research, reviews, and video articles. The audience consists of gynecologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, pathologists, and research scientists with a special interest in gynecological oncology.
期刊最新文献
Avoidance of adjuvant radiotherapy in inter mediate-risk endometrial carcinoma. Challenging the standard in early-stage ovarian cancer: current evidence and a standardized framework for sentinel node mapping. De-escalation in stage IC epithelial ovarian cancer: adjuvant treatment. Key considerations for safe de-escalation of therapy for POLE mutated endometrial cancer. Sentinel lymph node biopsy compared to no nodal assessment in endometrial cancer: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1