Assessment of readability of gynecologic cancer clinical trials literature at National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY International Journal of Gynecological Cancer Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-07 DOI:10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.101693
Julia Chalif, Wafa Khadraoui, John L Hays, Larry J Copeland, Roberto Vargas, David M O'Malley, Laura M Chambers
{"title":"Assessment of readability of gynecologic cancer clinical trials literature at National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers.","authors":"Julia Chalif, Wafa Khadraoui, John L Hays, Larry J Copeland, Roberto Vargas, David M O'Malley, Laura M Chambers","doi":"10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.101693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess the readability of patient-facing gynecologic cancer clinical trial information on National Cancer Institute-Designated Comprehensive Cancer Center (NCI-CCCs) websites.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional analysis of publicly accessible information pertaining to gynecologic cancer clinical trials on NCI-CCC's websites in September 2023. Clinical trial descriptions for endometrial, cervical, and ovarian cancers were assessed. Websites with limited to no descriptive information regarding their clinical trials were excluded. Readability was assessed using Readability Studio Professional Edition software for 5 readability metrics (FORCAST, Fry, Gunning Fog, Raygor Estimate, and SMOG).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 56 NCI-CCCs evaluated, 78% (n = 44) had information pertaining to gynecologic cancer clinical trials and gynecologic clinical trial descriptions for readability analysis. A total of 14% (n = 8) lacked clinical trial descriptions and linked to Clinicaltrials.gov and 7% (n = 4) only had information available through additional inquiry within the cancer center. The overall mean reading level across all NCI-CCCs was 15th-grade or collegiate-level reading. The specific readability metric analyses were as follows: FORCAST: 12.4 (range; 9.7-14.7), Fry: 17 (range; 13-17), Gunning Fog: 16.8 (range; 10-19), Raygor Estimate: 16 (range; 7-17), and SMOG: 16.5 (range; 11.4-19). Clinical trial information was stratified by the National Cancer Institute Geographic Management of Cancer Health Disparities Program, with no statistically significant differences in readability or complexity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this analysis of publicly available patient-facing information on NCI-CCC websites regarding gynecologic cancer clinical trials, the readability scores were above the high school level across the United States, which far exceeds the recommended readability metric of sixth grade by the National Institutes of Health. Opportunities exist to improve the readability of gynecologic cancer clinical trial online literature, which may facilitate patient access, participation, and understanding.</p>","PeriodicalId":14097,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","volume":" ","pages":"101693"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.101693","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to assess the readability of patient-facing gynecologic cancer clinical trial information on National Cancer Institute-Designated Comprehensive Cancer Center (NCI-CCCs) websites.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional analysis of publicly accessible information pertaining to gynecologic cancer clinical trials on NCI-CCC's websites in September 2023. Clinical trial descriptions for endometrial, cervical, and ovarian cancers were assessed. Websites with limited to no descriptive information regarding their clinical trials were excluded. Readability was assessed using Readability Studio Professional Edition software for 5 readability metrics (FORCAST, Fry, Gunning Fog, Raygor Estimate, and SMOG).

Results: Of 56 NCI-CCCs evaluated, 78% (n = 44) had information pertaining to gynecologic cancer clinical trials and gynecologic clinical trial descriptions for readability analysis. A total of 14% (n = 8) lacked clinical trial descriptions and linked to Clinicaltrials.gov and 7% (n = 4) only had information available through additional inquiry within the cancer center. The overall mean reading level across all NCI-CCCs was 15th-grade or collegiate-level reading. The specific readability metric analyses were as follows: FORCAST: 12.4 (range; 9.7-14.7), Fry: 17 (range; 13-17), Gunning Fog: 16.8 (range; 10-19), Raygor Estimate: 16 (range; 7-17), and SMOG: 16.5 (range; 11.4-19). Clinical trial information was stratified by the National Cancer Institute Geographic Management of Cancer Health Disparities Program, with no statistically significant differences in readability or complexity.

Conclusions: In this analysis of publicly available patient-facing information on NCI-CCC websites regarding gynecologic cancer clinical trials, the readability scores were above the high school level across the United States, which far exceeds the recommended readability metric of sixth grade by the National Institutes of Health. Opportunities exist to improve the readability of gynecologic cancer clinical trial online literature, which may facilitate patient access, participation, and understanding.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国家癌症研究所指定的综合癌症中心妇科癌症临床试验文献的可读性评估。
目的:本研究旨在评估美国国家癌症研究所指定的综合癌症中心(NCI-CCCs)网站上面向患者的妇科癌症临床试验信息的可读性。方法:对NCI-CCC网站于2023年9月公开获取的妇科癌症临床试验信息进行横断面分析。评估子宫内膜癌、宫颈癌和卵巢癌的临床试验描述。排除了有关其临床试验的有限或没有描述性信息的网站。使用Readability Studio Professional Edition软件对5个可读性指标(forecast、Fry、Gunning Fog、Raygor Estimate和SMOG)进行可读性评估。结果:在评估的56例NCI-CCCs中,78% (n = 44)具有与妇科癌症临床试验相关的信息和用于可读性分析的妇科临床试验描述。共有14% (n = 8)缺乏临床试验描述并与Clinicaltrials.gov相关联,7% (n = 4)仅通过癌症中心的额外查询获得信息。所有NCI-CCCs的总体平均阅读水平为15年级或大学水平。具体的可读性指标分析如下:forecast: 12.4(范围;9.7-14.7), Fry: 17(范围;13-17),射击雾:16.8(射程;10-19), Raygor估计:16(范围;7-17),和烟雾:16.5(范围;-19 - 11.4)。临床试验信息由国家癌症研究所癌症健康差异地理管理项目分层,在可读性和复杂性方面没有统计学上的显著差异。结论:通过对NCI-CCC网站上公开的关于妇科癌症临床试验的面向患者信息的分析,美国各地的可读性得分高于高中水平,远远超过美国国立卫生研究院推荐的六年级可读性指标。有机会提高妇科癌症临床试验在线文献的可读性,这可能有助于患者获取、参与和理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
280
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, the official journal of the International Gynecologic Cancer Society and the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, is the primary educational and informational publication for topics relevant to detection, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of gynecologic malignancies. IJGC emphasizes a multidisciplinary approach, and includes original research, reviews, and video articles. The audience consists of gynecologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, pathologists, and research scientists with a special interest in gynecological oncology.
期刊最新文献
Letter in response to correspondence on "Comparative analysis of adjuvant treatment outcomes in stage III endometrial cancer: overall survival, recurrence-free survival, site of primary recurrence, and toxicity" by Fang & Hu. Clinical behavior of FIGO stage I endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma diagnosed as high grade on pre-operative biopsy and low grade on hysterectomy specimen. Avoidance of adjuvant radiotherapy in inter mediate-risk endometrial carcinoma. Challenging the standard in early-stage ovarian cancer: current evidence and a standardized framework for sentinel node mapping. De-escalation in stage IC epithelial ovarian cancer: adjuvant treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1