Evaluating Clinical Outcomes of Telehealth as Adjunct to In-Person Care for Older Adults with Diabetes: A Systematic Review of Research Studies.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Population Health Management Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-20 DOI:10.1089/pop.2024.0135
Jorge Isaac Peña Garcia, Sahebi Saiyed, Monica Gavaller, Elena Cabb, Katharina V Echt, Erin E Reardon, Mary Rhee, Quratulain Syed
{"title":"Evaluating Clinical Outcomes of Telehealth as Adjunct to In-Person Care for Older Adults with Diabetes: A Systematic Review of Research Studies.","authors":"Jorge Isaac Peña Garcia, Sahebi Saiyed, Monica Gavaller, Elena Cabb, Katharina V Echt, Erin E Reardon, Mary Rhee, Quratulain Syed","doi":"10.1089/pop.2024.0135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim was to compare clinical outcomes for older adults with diabetes who received telehealth (TH) as an adjunct to in-person care (F2F) compared with those who received in-person only care (F2F). Systematic literature search was performed using the following databases: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, CINAHL, and ClinicalTrials.gov to include studies involving TH care for older adults with diabetes. Two authors independently reviewed the full text of shortlisted articles. A total of four studies that met the eligibility criteria were included. One study showed slight worsening in glycemic control in the TH group, but the remaining three showed improvement or no difference between the two groups. This review shows that TH modality, when utilized as an adjunct to F2F care, has comparability to F2F alone, with similar or better glycemic control for older adults with type II diabetes, especially those residing in rural communities, those older than age 75, and those with multiple comorbidities who had multiple clinical encounters.</p>","PeriodicalId":20396,"journal":{"name":"Population Health Management","volume":" ","pages":"179-186"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population Health Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/pop.2024.0135","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim was to compare clinical outcomes for older adults with diabetes who received telehealth (TH) as an adjunct to in-person care (F2F) compared with those who received in-person only care (F2F). Systematic literature search was performed using the following databases: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, CINAHL, and ClinicalTrials.gov to include studies involving TH care for older adults with diabetes. Two authors independently reviewed the full text of shortlisted articles. A total of four studies that met the eligibility criteria were included. One study showed slight worsening in glycemic control in the TH group, but the remaining three showed improvement or no difference between the two groups. This review shows that TH modality, when utilized as an adjunct to F2F care, has comparability to F2F alone, with similar or better glycemic control for older adults with type II diabetes, especially those residing in rural communities, those older than age 75, and those with multiple comorbidities who had multiple clinical encounters.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估远程医疗作为老年人糖尿病患者亲自护理辅助的临床结果:研究的系统回顾。
目的是比较接受远程医疗(TH)作为面对面护理(F2F)辅助的老年糖尿病患者与仅接受面对面护理(F2F)的老年人的临床结果。使用以下数据库进行系统的文献检索:Ovid MEDLINE、Embase、Scopus、Web of Science、Cochrane、CINAHL和ClinicalTrials.gov,以纳入涉及老年糖尿病患者TH护理的研究。两位作者独立审查入围文章的全文。共纳入了四项符合入选标准的研究。一项研究显示,TH组的血糖控制略有恶化,但其余三项研究显示两组之间的血糖控制有所改善或没有差异。这篇综述表明,当作为F2F护理的辅助手段时,TH模式与单独使用F2F具有可比性,对于老年II型糖尿病患者具有相似或更好的血糖控制,特别是那些居住在农村社区,年龄超过75岁的患者,以及那些患有多种合并症且多次临床就诊的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Population Health Management
Population Health Management 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Population Health Management provides comprehensive, authoritative strategies for improving the systems and policies that affect health care quality, access, and outcomes, ultimately improving the health of an entire population. The Journal delivers essential research on a broad range of topics including the impact of social, cultural, economic, and environmental factors on health care systems and practices. Population Health Management coverage includes: Clinical case reports and studies on managing major public health conditions Compliance programs Health economics Outcomes assessment Provider incentives Health care reform Resource management Return on investment (ROI) Health care quality Care coordination.
期刊最新文献
Cost-Effectiveness of Screening and Early Diagnosis Strategies for Cancer in the General Adult Population in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review. Feasibility of an Adaptive Food Insecurity Intervention for Patients with Uncontrolled Hypertension: A Pilot SMART. Progression to the Mean: Reconciling Traditional and Modern Professional Values in Medicine. Development of Digital Algorithms for the Early Identification of Rare Clinical Outcomes Using Electronic Medical Records: A Case Study of Hidradenitis Suppurativa. Adopting Health Technologies in Israel and England.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1