Health Resources and Services Administration-Funded Health Centers Reduce Health Care Expenditures of California Medicaid Managed Care Beneficiaries with Complex Needs.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Population Health Management Pub Date : 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1089/pop.2024.0241
Nadereh Pourat, Weihao Zhao, Leigh Ann Haley, Jamie Ryan, Alek Sripipatana
{"title":"Health Resources and Services Administration-Funded Health Centers Reduce Health Care Expenditures of California Medicaid Managed Care Beneficiaries with Complex Needs.","authors":"Nadereh Pourat, Weihao Zhao, Leigh Ann Haley, Jamie Ryan, Alek Sripipatana","doi":"10.1089/pop.2024.0241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The authors aimed to investigate potential differences between health care use and related payments for patients with complex needs and high costs in Health Resources and Services Administration-funded health centers (HCs) and with other safety net primary care providers. The authors used data from the California Health Homes Program that was designed to improve health outcomes and reduce expenditures of such Medicaid managed care beneficiaries. The authors used 2018 data prior to program implementation and conducted propensity score-matched regressions. The authors then estimated predicted rates of use across seven service categories and payment values for each category and for overall payments. The authors found that 29% of the sample were HC patients and had lower estimated average total payment values ($21,220) than group provider patients ($23,180). HC patients also had lower values for hospitalizations and long-term facility stays and higher values for primary and mental health services than all other providers. Payment differences were generally consistent with differences in predicted rates of use. These findings suggest that HC approaches to managing patient care access and integrated mental health services may explain these differences in use and payment patterns.</p>","PeriodicalId":20396,"journal":{"name":"Population Health Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population Health Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/pop.2024.0241","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The authors aimed to investigate potential differences between health care use and related payments for patients with complex needs and high costs in Health Resources and Services Administration-funded health centers (HCs) and with other safety net primary care providers. The authors used data from the California Health Homes Program that was designed to improve health outcomes and reduce expenditures of such Medicaid managed care beneficiaries. The authors used 2018 data prior to program implementation and conducted propensity score-matched regressions. The authors then estimated predicted rates of use across seven service categories and payment values for each category and for overall payments. The authors found that 29% of the sample were HC patients and had lower estimated average total payment values ($21,220) than group provider patients ($23,180). HC patients also had lower values for hospitalizations and long-term facility stays and higher values for primary and mental health services than all other providers. Payment differences were generally consistent with differences in predicted rates of use. These findings suggest that HC approaches to managing patient care access and integrated mental health services may explain these differences in use and payment patterns.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作者旨在调查由卫生资源与服务管理局资助的医疗中心(HCs)与其他安全网初级医疗服务提供者为需求复杂、费用高昂的患者提供的医疗服务使用情况和相关费用之间的潜在差异。作者使用的数据来自加利福尼亚州健康家园计划,该计划旨在改善此类医疗补助管理式护理受益人的健康状况并减少支出。作者使用了计划实施前的 2018 年数据,并进行了倾向得分匹配回归。然后,作者估算了七个服务类别的预测使用率以及每个类别的支付值和总体支付值。作者发现,29% 的样本是急诊患者,其估计平均总支付值(21,220 美元)低于团体提供者患者(23,180 美元)。与所有其他医疗服务提供者相比,慢性病患者的住院和长期住院价值较低,而初级和精神健康服务价值较高。付款差异与预测使用率的差异基本一致。这些研究结果表明,医护人员管理患者就医途径和综合精神健康服务的方法可以解释这些使用和支付模式的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Population Health Management
Population Health Management 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Population Health Management provides comprehensive, authoritative strategies for improving the systems and policies that affect health care quality, access, and outcomes, ultimately improving the health of an entire population. The Journal delivers essential research on a broad range of topics including the impact of social, cultural, economic, and environmental factors on health care systems and practices. Population Health Management coverage includes: Clinical case reports and studies on managing major public health conditions Compliance programs Health economics Outcomes assessment Provider incentives Health care reform Resource management Return on investment (ROI) Health care quality Care coordination.
期刊最新文献
Health Resources and Services Administration-Funded Health Centers Reduce Health Care Expenditures of California Medicaid Managed Care Beneficiaries with Complex Needs. Evaluating Clinical Outcomes of Telehealth as Adjunct to In-Person Care for Older Adults with Diabetes: A Systematic Review of Research Studies. Bridging the Digital Divide: A Practical Roadmap for Deploying Medical Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Low-Resource Settings. Community-Based Mental Health Improvement Initiatives: A Narrative Review and Indiana Case Study. Scoping Review of Indices to Measure a Community's Health Status.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1