Pouria Pourzand, Johanna Moore, Anja Metzger, Mithun Suresh, Bayert Salverda, Hamza Hai, Sue Duval, Kerry Bachista, Guillaume Debaty, Keith Lurie
{"title":"Intraventricular Pressure and Volume during Conventional and Automated Head-up CPR.","authors":"Pouria Pourzand, Johanna Moore, Anja Metzger, Mithun Suresh, Bayert Salverda, Hamza Hai, Sue Duval, Kerry Bachista, Guillaume Debaty, Keith Lurie","doi":"10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Active compression-decompression (ACD) CPR, an impedance threshold device (ITD) and automated head and thorax elevation, collectively termed AHUP-CPR, increases cerebral and coronary perfusion pressures, brain blood flow, end-tidal CO2 (ETCO2) and cerebral oximetry (rSO2) in animal models compared with conventional (C) CPR. We tested the hypothesis that cardiac stroke volume (SV) is higher with AHUP-CPR versus C-CPR or ACD+ITD in a porcine cardiac arrest model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Farm pigs (n=14) were sedated, anesthetized, and ventilated. Hemodynamics, including biventricular pressure-volume loops, were continuously measured. Following 10 minutes of untreated ventricular fibrillation, C-CPR was performed for 2 minutes, then ACD+ITD for 2 minutes in the flat position, then AHUP-CPR thereafter. Linear mixed-effects model and Pearson correlation comparisons were used for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Coronary and cerebral perfusion pressures, ETCO2, rSO2, and right (RV) and left (LV) ventricular SV increased progressively and significantly with the implementation of AHUP-CPR (p<0.05). RV SV with C-CPR was 24.8 ± 2.8 mL (∼48% of baseline) versus 45.2 ± 4.1 with AHUP-CPR (∼90% of baseline) (p<0.01). LV SV with C-CPR was 17.6 ± 1.8 mL (∼35% of baseline) versus 38.7 ± 6.7 with AHUP-CPR (∼80% of baseline) (p<0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A fundamental and inherent shortcoming of C-CPR, limited cardiac stroke volume, and resultant forward flow, can be overcome with AHUP-CPR. These findings may help explain the better outcomes associated with early use of AHUP-CPR.</p>","PeriodicalId":21052,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation","volume":" ","pages":"110551"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110551","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Active compression-decompression (ACD) CPR, an impedance threshold device (ITD) and automated head and thorax elevation, collectively termed AHUP-CPR, increases cerebral and coronary perfusion pressures, brain blood flow, end-tidal CO2 (ETCO2) and cerebral oximetry (rSO2) in animal models compared with conventional (C) CPR. We tested the hypothesis that cardiac stroke volume (SV) is higher with AHUP-CPR versus C-CPR or ACD+ITD in a porcine cardiac arrest model.
Methods: Farm pigs (n=14) were sedated, anesthetized, and ventilated. Hemodynamics, including biventricular pressure-volume loops, were continuously measured. Following 10 minutes of untreated ventricular fibrillation, C-CPR was performed for 2 minutes, then ACD+ITD for 2 minutes in the flat position, then AHUP-CPR thereafter. Linear mixed-effects model and Pearson correlation comparisons were used for statistical analysis.
Results: Coronary and cerebral perfusion pressures, ETCO2, rSO2, and right (RV) and left (LV) ventricular SV increased progressively and significantly with the implementation of AHUP-CPR (p<0.05). RV SV with C-CPR was 24.8 ± 2.8 mL (∼48% of baseline) versus 45.2 ± 4.1 with AHUP-CPR (∼90% of baseline) (p<0.01). LV SV with C-CPR was 17.6 ± 1.8 mL (∼35% of baseline) versus 38.7 ± 6.7 with AHUP-CPR (∼80% of baseline) (p<0.01).
Conclusion: A fundamental and inherent shortcoming of C-CPR, limited cardiac stroke volume, and resultant forward flow, can be overcome with AHUP-CPR. These findings may help explain the better outcomes associated with early use of AHUP-CPR.
期刊介绍:
Resuscitation is a monthly international and interdisciplinary medical journal. The papers published deal with the aetiology, pathophysiology and prevention of cardiac arrest, resuscitation training, clinical resuscitation, and experimental resuscitation research, although papers relating to animal studies will be published only if they are of exceptional interest and related directly to clinical cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Papers relating to trauma are published occasionally but the majority of these concern traumatic cardiac arrest.