Intraventricular Pressure and Volume during Conventional and Automated Head-up CPR.

IF 6.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Resuscitation Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110551
Pouria Pourzand, Johanna Moore, Anja Metzger, Mithun Suresh, Bayert Salverda, Hamza Hai, Sue Duval, Kerry Bachista, Guillaume Debaty, Keith Lurie
{"title":"Intraventricular Pressure and Volume during Conventional and Automated Head-up CPR.","authors":"Pouria Pourzand, Johanna Moore, Anja Metzger, Mithun Suresh, Bayert Salverda, Hamza Hai, Sue Duval, Kerry Bachista, Guillaume Debaty, Keith Lurie","doi":"10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Active compression-decompression (ACD) CPR, an impedance threshold device (ITD) and automated head and thorax elevation, collectively termed AHUP-CPR, increases cerebral and coronary perfusion pressures, brain blood flow, end-tidal CO2 (ETCO2) and cerebral oximetry (rSO2) in animal models compared with conventional (C) CPR. We tested the hypothesis that cardiac stroke volume (SV) is higher with AHUP-CPR versus C-CPR or ACD+ITD in a porcine cardiac arrest model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Farm pigs (n=14) were sedated, anesthetized, and ventilated. Hemodynamics, including biventricular pressure-volume loops, were continuously measured. Following 10 minutes of untreated ventricular fibrillation, C-CPR was performed for 2 minutes, then ACD+ITD for 2 minutes in the flat position, then AHUP-CPR thereafter. Linear mixed-effects model and Pearson correlation comparisons were used for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Coronary and cerebral perfusion pressures, ETCO2, rSO2, and right (RV) and left (LV) ventricular SV increased progressively and significantly with the implementation of AHUP-CPR (p<0.05). RV SV with C-CPR was 24.8 ± 2.8 mL (∼48% of baseline) versus 45.2 ± 4.1 with AHUP-CPR (∼90% of baseline) (p<0.01). LV SV with C-CPR was 17.6 ± 1.8 mL (∼35% of baseline) versus 38.7 ± 6.7 with AHUP-CPR (∼80% of baseline) (p<0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A fundamental and inherent shortcoming of C-CPR, limited cardiac stroke volume, and resultant forward flow, can be overcome with AHUP-CPR. These findings may help explain the better outcomes associated with early use of AHUP-CPR.</p>","PeriodicalId":21052,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation","volume":" ","pages":"110551"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110551","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Active compression-decompression (ACD) CPR, an impedance threshold device (ITD) and automated head and thorax elevation, collectively termed AHUP-CPR, increases cerebral and coronary perfusion pressures, brain blood flow, end-tidal CO2 (ETCO2) and cerebral oximetry (rSO2) in animal models compared with conventional (C) CPR. We tested the hypothesis that cardiac stroke volume (SV) is higher with AHUP-CPR versus C-CPR or ACD+ITD in a porcine cardiac arrest model.

Methods: Farm pigs (n=14) were sedated, anesthetized, and ventilated. Hemodynamics, including biventricular pressure-volume loops, were continuously measured. Following 10 minutes of untreated ventricular fibrillation, C-CPR was performed for 2 minutes, then ACD+ITD for 2 minutes in the flat position, then AHUP-CPR thereafter. Linear mixed-effects model and Pearson correlation comparisons were used for statistical analysis.

Results: Coronary and cerebral perfusion pressures, ETCO2, rSO2, and right (RV) and left (LV) ventricular SV increased progressively and significantly with the implementation of AHUP-CPR (p<0.05). RV SV with C-CPR was 24.8 ± 2.8 mL (∼48% of baseline) versus 45.2 ± 4.1 with AHUP-CPR (∼90% of baseline) (p<0.01). LV SV with C-CPR was 17.6 ± 1.8 mL (∼35% of baseline) versus 38.7 ± 6.7 with AHUP-CPR (∼80% of baseline) (p<0.01).

Conclusion: A fundamental and inherent shortcoming of C-CPR, limited cardiac stroke volume, and resultant forward flow, can be overcome with AHUP-CPR. These findings may help explain the better outcomes associated with early use of AHUP-CPR.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Resuscitation
Resuscitation 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
18.50%
发文量
556
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Resuscitation is a monthly international and interdisciplinary medical journal. The papers published deal with the aetiology, pathophysiology and prevention of cardiac arrest, resuscitation training, clinical resuscitation, and experimental resuscitation research, although papers relating to animal studies will be published only if they are of exceptional interest and related directly to clinical cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Papers relating to trauma are published occasionally but the majority of these concern traumatic cardiac arrest.
期刊最新文献
Amiodarone vs Lidocaine in Adult Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest, is there a clear winner? Cardiac arrest survivors' self-reported cognitive function, and its association with self-reported health status, psychological distress, and life satisfaction-a Swedish nationwide registry study. Cost-Effectiveness of Drone-Delivered Automated External Defibrillators for Cardiac Arrest. Intraventricular Pressure and Volume during Conventional and Automated Head-up CPR. Reply to "Revisiting Priorities in Resuscitative Hysterotomy".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1