The Effect of Comfort Theory-Based Nursing Care on Intolerance of Uncertainty and Comfort Levels in Individuals Undergoing Hemodialysis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 NURSING Research and Theory for Nursing Practice Pub Date : 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1891/RTNP-2024-0114
Kübra Gümüştekin, Yasemin Özyer Güvener
{"title":"The Effect of Comfort Theory-Based Nursing Care on Intolerance of Uncertainty and Comfort Levels in Individuals Undergoing Hemodialysis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Kübra Gümüştekin, Yasemin Özyer Güvener","doi":"10.1891/RTNP-2024-0114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and Purpose:</b> Chronic renal failure is a common public health problem worldwide, and hemodialysis has become the standard treatment. During this long and exhausting process, it is extremely important that individuals undergoing hemodialysis receive effective and high-quality nursing care so that accurate prognoses can be made and complications prevented. This study aimed to determine the effect of comfort theory-based nursing care on intolerance to uncertainty and comfort levels in hemodialysis patients. <b>Methods:</b> The sample of this randomized controlled study consisted of individuals receiving hemodialysis at a private dialysis center. The sample comprised a total of 60 patients, 30 in the experimental group and 30 in the control group. Patients in the experimental group received training during an 8-week dialysis period using nursing care interventions based on Katharine Kolcaba's comfort theory for health care needs. The training content covered holistic nursing care and consisted of physical, psychospiritual, sociocultural, and environmental dimensions in order to reduce uncertainty and increase comfort levels in the individuals receiving dialysis. This care was based on Kolcaba's comfort theory. A Personal Information Form including the individuals' descriptive, disease, and treatment characteristics, the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale (IUS), and the General Comfort Questionnaire (GCQ) were used for data collection. Independent two-sample comparisons were performed using the χ² test for qualitative variables and the <i>t</i> test for quantitative variables. <b>Results:</b> In the comparison of the groups, there were significant results for the total GCQ and its subdimensions except for the relief subdimension (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The scores for the total IUS and its subdimensions were significant (<i>p</i> < 0.01). <b>Implications for Practice:</b> It was determined that comfort theory-based nursing care interventions were effective in reducing the level of intolerance of uncertainty and increasing the comfort level. It is recommended that comfort theory-based nursing care guidelines should be used to reduce the sense of uncertainty and increase the comfort levels of individuals receiving hemodialysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":51287,"journal":{"name":"Research and Theory for Nursing Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Theory for Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/RTNP-2024-0114","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Chronic renal failure is a common public health problem worldwide, and hemodialysis has become the standard treatment. During this long and exhausting process, it is extremely important that individuals undergoing hemodialysis receive effective and high-quality nursing care so that accurate prognoses can be made and complications prevented. This study aimed to determine the effect of comfort theory-based nursing care on intolerance to uncertainty and comfort levels in hemodialysis patients. Methods: The sample of this randomized controlled study consisted of individuals receiving hemodialysis at a private dialysis center. The sample comprised a total of 60 patients, 30 in the experimental group and 30 in the control group. Patients in the experimental group received training during an 8-week dialysis period using nursing care interventions based on Katharine Kolcaba's comfort theory for health care needs. The training content covered holistic nursing care and consisted of physical, psychospiritual, sociocultural, and environmental dimensions in order to reduce uncertainty and increase comfort levels in the individuals receiving dialysis. This care was based on Kolcaba's comfort theory. A Personal Information Form including the individuals' descriptive, disease, and treatment characteristics, the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale (IUS), and the General Comfort Questionnaire (GCQ) were used for data collection. Independent two-sample comparisons were performed using the χ² test for qualitative variables and the t test for quantitative variables. Results: In the comparison of the groups, there were significant results for the total GCQ and its subdimensions except for the relief subdimension (p < 0.05). The scores for the total IUS and its subdimensions were significant (p < 0.01). Implications for Practice: It was determined that comfort theory-based nursing care interventions were effective in reducing the level of intolerance of uncertainty and increasing the comfort level. It is recommended that comfort theory-based nursing care guidelines should be used to reduce the sense of uncertainty and increase the comfort levels of individuals receiving hemodialysis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Research and Theory for Nursing Practice focuses on issues relevant to improving nursing practice, education, and patient care. The articles strive to discuss knowledge development in its broadest sense, reflect research using a variety of methodological approaches, and combine several methods and strategies in a single study. Because of the journal''s international emphasis, article contributors address the implications of their studies for an international audience.
期刊最新文献
Cognitive Health Motivation: A Concept Analysis Using the Walker and Avant Method. Comparison of Symptom Distress Ranking Between Oncology Nurses and Pediatric Patients Receiving Chemotherapy. The Effect of Comfort Theory-Based Nursing Care on Intolerance of Uncertainty and Comfort Levels in Individuals Undergoing Hemodialysis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Toward a Situation-Specific Theory of Nursing Organizational Well-Being: An Early-Stage Development. The Effect of Cosmetic Makeup on Body Imagery and Anxiety and Depression in Patients Undergoing Postoperative Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1