No disadvantages for women in acute stroke care in Germany: an analysis of access to stroke treatment services in Germany from 2017 to 2022.

Matthias N Ungerer, Dirk Bartig, Christine Tunkl, Daniel Richter, Aristeidis Katsanos, Christos Krogias, Werner Hacke, Christoph Gumbinger
{"title":"No disadvantages for women in acute stroke care in Germany: an analysis of access to stroke treatment services in Germany from 2017 to 2022.","authors":"Matthias N Ungerer, Dirk Bartig, Christine Tunkl, Daniel Richter, Aristeidis Katsanos, Christos Krogias, Werner Hacke, Christoph Gumbinger","doi":"10.1186/s42466-025-00365-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several publications have raised concerns that female stroke patients may be at a disadvantage when accessing stroke treatment services. These publications have found significant regional differences in the provision of stroke treatment to male and female patients. In this study, we provide current nationwide data on stroke management differences between men and women in Germany.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This large retrospective cohort study used national datasets from the German Federal Statistical Office for 2017-2022. We examined differences between female and male stroke patients in terms of case volume, intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), mechanical thrombectomy (MTE), stroke unit (SU) treatment, intrahospital mortality, and prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from more than 1.3 million hospitalised stroke patients were included. Forty-seven percent of the patients were female. Female patients were older and more frequently ≥ 80 years old (50.3% versus 29.4%). Rates of IVT (16.3% versus 16.3%) were similar for both sexes but higher in females when adjusted for age. MTE rates (8.2% versus 6.3%) were consistently higher in female patients across all age groups. Female patients had higher rates of intrahospital mortality (9.1% versus 6.2%), and admission to SUs (73.6% versus 76.0%) was less common. Treatment rates in intensive care units were similar (10.6% versus 10.5%). AF, a surrogate for embolic (and more severe) strokes, was more prevalent in females (32.6% versus 25.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found no evidence that female stroke patients in Germany face any disadvantage in accessing stroke treatment services. Acute stroke treatment rates were generally similar or higher when compared to males. Higher intrahospital mortality and lower SU rates were attributed to greater age, comorbidities, and stroke severity. However, the differences were not fully explained when adjusting for AF and age. Further research is needed on sex differences in stroke mechanisms and outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94156,"journal":{"name":"Neurological research and practice","volume":"7 1","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-025-00365-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Several publications have raised concerns that female stroke patients may be at a disadvantage when accessing stroke treatment services. These publications have found significant regional differences in the provision of stroke treatment to male and female patients. In this study, we provide current nationwide data on stroke management differences between men and women in Germany.

Methods: This large retrospective cohort study used national datasets from the German Federal Statistical Office for 2017-2022. We examined differences between female and male stroke patients in terms of case volume, intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), mechanical thrombectomy (MTE), stroke unit (SU) treatment, intrahospital mortality, and prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF).

Results: Data from more than 1.3 million hospitalised stroke patients were included. Forty-seven percent of the patients were female. Female patients were older and more frequently ≥ 80 years old (50.3% versus 29.4%). Rates of IVT (16.3% versus 16.3%) were similar for both sexes but higher in females when adjusted for age. MTE rates (8.2% versus 6.3%) were consistently higher in female patients across all age groups. Female patients had higher rates of intrahospital mortality (9.1% versus 6.2%), and admission to SUs (73.6% versus 76.0%) was less common. Treatment rates in intensive care units were similar (10.6% versus 10.5%). AF, a surrogate for embolic (and more severe) strokes, was more prevalent in females (32.6% versus 25.4%).

Conclusions: We found no evidence that female stroke patients in Germany face any disadvantage in accessing stroke treatment services. Acute stroke treatment rates were generally similar or higher when compared to males. Higher intrahospital mortality and lower SU rates were attributed to greater age, comorbidities, and stroke severity. However, the differences were not fully explained when adjusting for AF and age. Further research is needed on sex differences in stroke mechanisms and outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
No disadvantages for women in acute stroke care in Germany: an analysis of access to stroke treatment services in Germany from 2017 to 2022. AI and Neurology. Neurological Research and Practice - the premier journal of the German Society of Neurology: recent development and future perspectives. Severe subacute combined degeneration of the spinal cord resulting from nitrous oxide (N2O) abuse: a case series. Association of oral anticoagulants with risk of brain haemorrhage expansion compared to no-anticoagulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1