Stereotactic Arrhythmia Radioablation for Refractory Ventricular Tachycardia: A Narrative Review and Exploratory Pooled Analysis of Clinical Outcomes and Toxicity.

ArXiv Pub Date : 2025-05-14
Keyur D Shah, Chih-Wei Chang, Sibo Tian, Pretesh Patel, Richard Qiu, Justin Roper, Jun Zhou, Zhen Tian, Xiaofeng Yang
{"title":"Stereotactic Arrhythmia Radioablation for Refractory Ventricular Tachycardia: A Narrative Review and Exploratory Pooled Analysis of Clinical Outcomes and Toxicity.","authors":"Keyur D Shah, Chih-Wei Chang, Sibo Tian, Pretesh Patel, Richard Qiu, Justin Roper, Jun Zhou, Zhen Tian, Xiaofeng Yang","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) is a non-invasive salvage therapy for refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT), especially in patients ineligible for catheter ablation. This narrative review and pooled analysis evaluates the safety, efficacy, and technical characteristics of STAR, integrating preclinical studies, case reports, case series, and clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>A comprehensive review identified 86 studies published between 2015 and 2025, including 12 preclinical studies, 49 case reports, 18 case series, and 7 clinical trials. Study-level data were extracted for pooled analysis of 6- and 12-month mortality, VT burden reduction, and grade 3+ acute toxicities. Subgroup analyses were performed by delivery modality, age, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and cardiomyopathy type.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pooled mortality was 16% (95% CI: 11-20%) at 6 months and 33% (95% CI: 27-38%) at 12 months. VT burden reduction at 6 months averaged 75% (95% CI: 73-77%) but showed substantial heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 98.8%). Grade 3+ acute toxicities occurred in 7% (95% CI: 4-10%), with heart failure being most common. Subgroup analyses suggested better outcomes in younger patients, those with NICM, and those with higher LVEF.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>STAR is a promising salvage therapy with favorable acute safety and efficacy. Outcome heterogeneity and inconsistent reporting highlight the need for standardized definitions, dosimetric protocols, and longer-term follow-up. Prospective trials and real-world registries are critical for refining STAR's role in VT management.</p>","PeriodicalId":93888,"journal":{"name":"ArXiv","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11838787/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ArXiv","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) is a non-invasive salvage therapy for refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT), especially in patients ineligible for catheter ablation. This narrative review and pooled analysis evaluates the safety, efficacy, and technical characteristics of STAR, integrating preclinical studies, case reports, case series, and clinical trials.

Methods and materials: A comprehensive review identified 86 studies published between 2015 and 2025, including 12 preclinical studies, 49 case reports, 18 case series, and 7 clinical trials. Study-level data were extracted for pooled analysis of 6- and 12-month mortality, VT burden reduction, and grade 3+ acute toxicities. Subgroup analyses were performed by delivery modality, age, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and cardiomyopathy type.

Results: Pooled mortality was 16% (95% CI: 11-20%) at 6 months and 33% (95% CI: 27-38%) at 12 months. VT burden reduction at 6 months averaged 75% (95% CI: 73-77%) but showed substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 98.8%). Grade 3+ acute toxicities occurred in 7% (95% CI: 4-10%), with heart failure being most common. Subgroup analyses suggested better outcomes in younger patients, those with NICM, and those with higher LVEF.

Conclusions: STAR is a promising salvage therapy with favorable acute safety and efficacy. Outcome heterogeneity and inconsistent reporting highlight the need for standardized definitions, dosimetric protocols, and longer-term follow-up. Prospective trials and real-world registries are critical for refining STAR's role in VT management.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评价立体定向心律失常放射消融术治疗室性心动过速的有效性和安全性:一项综合系统综述和荟萃分析。
目的:立体定向心律失常放射消融术(STAR)已成为难治性室性心动过速(VT)的一种有前途的无创治疗方法,为不适合导管消融的患者提供了一种新的选择。本系统综述和荟萃分析通过临床前研究、病例报告、病例系列和临床试验来评估STAR的安全性、有效性和技术方面。方法和材料:系统回顾了2015年至2024年间发表的80项研究,包括12项临床前研究、47例病例报告、15例病例系列和6项临床试验。提取患者人口统计学、治疗参数和临床结果的数据。对合并死亡率、室速负担减轻和急性毒性进行荟萃分析,并对心肌病类型、年龄、左室射血分数(LVEF)和治疗方式进行亚组分析。结果:6个月和12个月的总死亡率分别为16% (95% CI: 11-21%)和32% (95% CI: 26-39%)。6个月时VT负担减轻75% (95% CI: 73-77%),具有显著的异质性(I^2 = 98.8%)。7%的患者出现3级以上急性毒性(95% CI: 4-11%),其中肺炎最为常见。亚组分析显示,基于LINAC和射波刀的治疗结果相当,基于患者特征和心肌病类型的差异较小。结论:STAR在减轻室速负担和改善患者预后方面具有显著的潜力。虽然良好的急性安全性和有效性支持临床采用,但治疗方案的可变性强调了标准化实践的必要性。未来的研究应着眼于优化患者选择,建立可靠的剂量学标准,并评估长期安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Conditionally Site-Independent Neural Evolution of Antibody Sequences. Causal Interpretation of Neural Network Computations with Contribution Decomposition. Rotation-invariant graph message passing enables acquisition protocol generalisation in learning-based brain microstructure estimation. Linear Acceleration Is a Primary Risk Factor for Concussion and a Target for Prevention. Neural geometry in the human hippocampus enables generalization across spatial position and gaze.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1