Leveraging personality as a proxy of perceived transparency in hierarchical visualizations

IF 3.8 3区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Visual Informatics Pub Date : 2025-02-22 DOI:10.1016/j.visinf.2025.01.002
Tomás Alves , Carlota Dias , Daniel Gonçalves , Sandra Gama
{"title":"Leveraging personality as a proxy of perceived transparency in hierarchical visualizations","authors":"Tomás Alves ,&nbsp;Carlota Dias ,&nbsp;Daniel Gonçalves ,&nbsp;Sandra Gama","doi":"10.1016/j.visinf.2025.01.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding which factors affect information visualization transparency continues to be one of the most relevant challenges in current research, especially since trust models how users build on the knowledge and use it. This work extends the current body of research by studying the user’s subjective evaluation of the visualization transparency of hierarchical charts through the clarity, coverage, and look and feel dimensions. Additionally, we extend the user profile to better understand whether personality facets manifest a biasing effect on the trust-building process. Our results show that the data encodings do not affect how users perceive visualization transparency while controlling for personality factors. Regarding personality, the propensity to trust affects how they judge the clarity of a hierarchical chart. Our findings provide new insights into the research challenges of measuring trust and understanding the transparency of information visualization. Specifically, we explore how personality factors manifest in this trust-building relationship and user interaction within visualization systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36903,"journal":{"name":"Visual Informatics","volume":"9 1","pages":"Pages 43-57"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visual Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468502X25000026","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding which factors affect information visualization transparency continues to be one of the most relevant challenges in current research, especially since trust models how users build on the knowledge and use it. This work extends the current body of research by studying the user’s subjective evaluation of the visualization transparency of hierarchical charts through the clarity, coverage, and look and feel dimensions. Additionally, we extend the user profile to better understand whether personality facets manifest a biasing effect on the trust-building process. Our results show that the data encodings do not affect how users perceive visualization transparency while controlling for personality factors. Regarding personality, the propensity to trust affects how they judge the clarity of a hierarchical chart. Our findings provide new insights into the research challenges of measuring trust and understanding the transparency of information visualization. Specifically, we explore how personality factors manifest in this trust-building relationship and user interaction within visualization systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Visual Informatics
Visual Informatics Computer Science-Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
33
审稿时长
79 days
期刊最新文献
Leveraging personality as a proxy of perceived transparency in hierarchical visualizations Visual comparative analytics of multimodal transportation Out-of-focus artifacts mitigation and autofocus methods for 3D displays Transforming cinematography lighting education in the metaverse Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1