A delicate dance: Value-added services and electricity security in decentralized systems

IF 9.2 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Energy Policy Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114550
Elad Shaviv , Shiri Zemah-Shamir , Yael Parag , Naama Teschner
{"title":"A delicate dance: Value-added services and electricity security in decentralized systems","authors":"Elad Shaviv ,&nbsp;Shiri Zemah-Shamir ,&nbsp;Yael Parag ,&nbsp;Naama Teschner","doi":"10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While the impact of liberalized and distributed energy systems (DES) on power systems and electricity security is well-documented, the role of small non-energy actors (NEAs) remains under-explored. These businesses offer electricity services as value-added services (VAS) alongside their core operations, often without formal classification or regulation within the energy sector. They may directly serve consumers or support energy actors such as aggregators and utilities by providing essential services like energy storage and distributed system maintenance. While NEAs can enhance market agility and competitiveness, they may also pose challenges to electricity affordability, reliability, and accessibility. This future-oriented study employs the Delphi method and an expert workshop to examine the implications of NEAs’ participation in DES. Findings indicate that existing policies lack effective mechanisms to govern DES involving multiple NEAs, particularly as their services become embedded in the electricity supply chain. Key concerns include NEAs' short-term focus, limited expertise in electricity markets, and unfamiliarity with power system regulations. The study recommends a balanced regulatory framework that fosters market openness and mitigates the identified concerns. Recommendations include defining clear service-level policies, developing business guidelines to ensure transparency, and establishing competency standards for these new actors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11672,"journal":{"name":"Energy Policy","volume":"200 ","pages":"Article 114550"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421525000576","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While the impact of liberalized and distributed energy systems (DES) on power systems and electricity security is well-documented, the role of small non-energy actors (NEAs) remains under-explored. These businesses offer electricity services as value-added services (VAS) alongside their core operations, often without formal classification or regulation within the energy sector. They may directly serve consumers or support energy actors such as aggregators and utilities by providing essential services like energy storage and distributed system maintenance. While NEAs can enhance market agility and competitiveness, they may also pose challenges to electricity affordability, reliability, and accessibility. This future-oriented study employs the Delphi method and an expert workshop to examine the implications of NEAs’ participation in DES. Findings indicate that existing policies lack effective mechanisms to govern DES involving multiple NEAs, particularly as their services become embedded in the electricity supply chain. Key concerns include NEAs' short-term focus, limited expertise in electricity markets, and unfamiliarity with power system regulations. The study recommends a balanced regulatory framework that fosters market openness and mitigates the identified concerns. Recommendations include defining clear service-level policies, developing business guidelines to ensure transparency, and establishing competency standards for these new actors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一个微妙的舞蹈:分散系统中的增值服务和电力安全
虽然自由化和分布式能源系统(DES)对电力系统和电力安全的影响有据可查,但小型非能源行为体(nea)的作用仍未得到充分探讨。这些企业将电力服务作为增值服务(VAS)提供给其核心业务,通常在能源部门没有正式的分类或监管。它们可以直接为消费者服务,也可以通过提供储能和分布式系统维护等基本服务来支持集成商和公用事业等能源参与者。虽然NEAs可以提高市场灵活性和竞争力,但它们也可能对电力的可负担性、可靠性和可及性构成挑战。这一面向未来的研究采用德尔菲法和专家研讨会来检验新能源机构参与电力供应的影响。研究结果表明,现有政策缺乏有效的机制来管理涉及多个新能源机构的电力供应,特别是当它们的服务嵌入到电力供应链中。主要问题包括nea的短期关注、电力市场专业知识有限以及对电力系统法规的不熟悉。该研究建议建立一个平衡的监管框架,促进市场开放,减轻已确定的担忧。建议包括定义明确的服务级别策略,制定业务指导方针以确保透明度,并为这些新参与者建立能力标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Policy
Energy Policy 管理科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
540
审稿时长
7.9 months
期刊介绍: Energy policy is the manner in which a given entity (often governmental) has decided to address issues of energy development including energy conversion, distribution and use as well as reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in order to contribute to climate change mitigation. The attributes of energy policy may include legislation, international treaties, incentives to investment, guidelines for energy conservation, taxation and other public policy techniques. Energy policy is closely related to climate change policy because totalled worldwide the energy sector emits more greenhouse gas than other sectors.
期刊最新文献
Energy policy sequencing for SDG-aligned transitions in East Asia–Pacific: Evidence of stage-dependent effects and threshold dynamics Urban development and the energy transition: Evidence from Chinese cities Can data infrastructure construction alleviate clean energy misallocation?—An analysis based on China's provincial data Mexico’s energy crossroads: Navigating a complex transition Geopolitical fragmentation and the clean energy transition: How economic sanctions hinder renewable energy development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1