Precision diagnostics for psychotic major depression: Construction and validation of a clinical indicator-based model

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Clinica Chimica Acta Pub Date : 2025-03-15 Epub Date: 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1016/j.cca.2025.120204
Weiquan Huang , Lanqing Li , Yan Jiang , Qinqin Lou , Junli Gao , Chunyan Zhu
{"title":"Precision diagnostics for psychotic major depression: Construction and validation of a clinical indicator-based model","authors":"Weiquan Huang ,&nbsp;Lanqing Li ,&nbsp;Yan Jiang ,&nbsp;Qinqin Lou ,&nbsp;Junli Gao ,&nbsp;Chunyan Zhu","doi":"10.1016/j.cca.2025.120204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Differentiating psychotic major depression (PMD) from non-PMD (NPMD) is crucial as it influences treatment decisions, prognosis, and patient outcomes. This study aims to develop an efficient model for precision diagnostics of PMD based on clinical indicators.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 731 patients who visited our hospital with major depression (MD) were enrolled, including a discovery cohort and a validation cohort. We retrospectively analyzed the distribution differences of 20 clinical indicators in the discovery cohort. We included differential clinical indicators (DCIs) in the logistic regression algorithm analysis to establish a multi-panel detection model. The model’s performance in distinguishing PMD from NPMD and in distinguishing bipolar MD from MD was validated in the validation cohort by the receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC), the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We have constructed a six-DCIs diagnosis model (6MP) based on the discovery cohort. The AUC of 6MP for identifying PMD and NPMD was 0.826, and the sensitivity and specificity were 87.5 % and 70.59 %, respectively. In the validation cohort, the AUC for identifying PMD and NPMD was 0.781, and the sensitivity and specificity were 78.99 % and 67.31 %. The AUC for identifying bipolar MD and MD without psychotic symptoms was 0.716, and the sensitivity and specificity were 60.71 % and 76.92 %.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study not only provides new tools for the precise diagnosis and treatment of PMD but also hopes to simplify the diagnostic process, improve the specificity of treatment, and thus bring more practical clinical benefits to patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10205,"journal":{"name":"Clinica Chimica Acta","volume":"570 ","pages":"Article 120204"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinica Chimica Acta","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000989812500083X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Differentiating psychotic major depression (PMD) from non-PMD (NPMD) is crucial as it influences treatment decisions, prognosis, and patient outcomes. This study aims to develop an efficient model for precision diagnostics of PMD based on clinical indicators.

Methods

A total of 731 patients who visited our hospital with major depression (MD) were enrolled, including a discovery cohort and a validation cohort. We retrospectively analyzed the distribution differences of 20 clinical indicators in the discovery cohort. We included differential clinical indicators (DCIs) in the logistic regression algorithm analysis to establish a multi-panel detection model. The model’s performance in distinguishing PMD from NPMD and in distinguishing bipolar MD from MD was validated in the validation cohort by the receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC), the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity.

Results

We have constructed a six-DCIs diagnosis model (6MP) based on the discovery cohort. The AUC of 6MP for identifying PMD and NPMD was 0.826, and the sensitivity and specificity were 87.5 % and 70.59 %, respectively. In the validation cohort, the AUC for identifying PMD and NPMD was 0.781, and the sensitivity and specificity were 78.99 % and 67.31 %. The AUC for identifying bipolar MD and MD without psychotic symptoms was 0.716, and the sensitivity and specificity were 60.71 % and 76.92 %.

Conclusions

This study not only provides new tools for the precise diagnosis and treatment of PMD but also hopes to simplify the diagnostic process, improve the specificity of treatment, and thus bring more practical clinical benefits to patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
精神病性重性抑郁症的精确诊断:基于临床指标的模型的构建和验证
背景区分精神病性重度抑郁症(PMD)与非精神病性重度抑郁症(NPMD)至关重要,因为它影响治疗决策、预后和患者预后。本研究旨在建立一种基于临床指标的PMD精确诊断模型。方法纳入731例来我院就诊的重度抑郁症(MD)患者,包括发现组和验证组。我们回顾性分析了发现队列中20项临床指标的分布差异。我们将差异临床指标(DCIs)纳入logistic回归算法分析,建立多面板检测模型。该模型在区分PMD和NPMD以及区分双相MD和MD方面的表现在验证队列中通过受试者操作者特征曲线(ROC)、曲线下面积(AUC)、敏感性和特异性进行了验证。结果建立了基于发现队列的6 dcis诊断模型(6MP)。6MP鉴别PMD和NPMD的AUC为0.826,敏感性和特异性分别为87.5%和70.59%。在验证队列中,鉴别PMD和NPMD的AUC为0.781,敏感性和特异性分别为78.99%和67.31%。鉴别双相MD和无精神症状MD的AUC为0.716,敏感性和特异性分别为60.71%和76.92%。结论本研究不仅为PMD的精准诊断和治疗提供了新的工具,而且有望简化诊断流程,提高治疗的特异性,从而为患者带来更多实际的临床效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinica Chimica Acta
Clinica Chimica Acta 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
2.00%
发文量
1268
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Official Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) Clinica Chimica Acta is a high-quality journal which publishes original Research Communications in the field of clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, defined as the diagnostic application of chemistry, biochemistry, immunochemistry, biochemical aspects of hematology, toxicology, and molecular biology to the study of human disease in body fluids and cells. The objective of the journal is to publish novel information leading to a better understanding of biological mechanisms of human diseases, their prevention, diagnosis, and patient management. Reports of an applied clinical character are also welcome. Papers concerned with normal metabolic processes or with constituents of normal cells or body fluids, such as reports of experimental or clinical studies in animals, are only considered when they are clearly and directly relevant to human disease. Evaluation of commercial products have a low priority for publication, unless they are novel or represent a technological breakthrough. Studies dealing with effects of drugs and natural products and studies dealing with the redox status in various diseases are not within the journal''s scope. Development and evaluation of novel analytical methodologies where applicable to diagnostic clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, including point-of-care testing, and topics on laboratory management and informatics will also be considered. Studies focused on emerging diagnostic technologies and (big) data analysis procedures including digitalization, mobile Health, and artificial Intelligence applied to Laboratory Medicine are also of interest.
期刊最新文献
A laboratory-driven clinical decision support system algorithm for personalized and automated cardiovascular risk stratification in primary care patients. Population-specific reference intervals for 22 biochemical analytes: three indirect methods application in a multi-ethnic area Resolving a complex GPIHBP1 exons 3–4 deletion adjacent to low-complexity repeats using adaptive sampling long-read sequencing in familial chylomicronaemia From bench to bedside: translating the histone deacetylase inhibitors into prostate cancer therapies Targeted next-generation sequencing in diagnosing reproductive tract infections: a comparative study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1