Human-wildlife interaction: Living with monkeys adjacent to Sao-hill Forest in Tanzania

Q2 Environmental Science Environmental Challenges Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1016/j.envc.2025.101108
Franco Peniel Mbise
{"title":"Human-wildlife interaction: Living with monkeys adjacent to Sao-hill Forest in Tanzania","authors":"Franco Peniel Mbise","doi":"10.1016/j.envc.2025.101108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The study assessed the dynamics of human-monkey conflict for communities living adjacent to Sao-hill Forest in Tanzania, with a particular focus on the factors influencing community perceptions of monkey populations, the effectiveness of crop protection measures, and attitudes towards monkey conservation in a rural setting. Quantitative method was used for data collection through a structured questionnaires targeting farmers and community members (<em>n</em> = 240). The key findings showed that 44.2 % of respondents perceived the monkey population as increasing, while 31.7 % believed it was decreasing, and 15.8 % saw it as stable. Gender and village location significantly influenced these perceptions, with males and residents of specific villages being less likely to perceive population changes. For crop protection, domestic dogs (34.2 %) and cow dung (20.0 %) were perceived as the most effective measures, with significant variations in effectiveness perceptions across different tribes. Regarding reasons for disliking monkeys, 56.7 % of respondents cited crop raiding as the primary issue, followed by property destruction (29.6 %) and attacks on chickens (13.8 %). Males were more likely to express dislike towards monkeys. Conservation suggestions were diverse, with conservation education being the most recommended (36.7 %), followed by fencing farms (25.4 %), and protecting monkey habitats (21.7 %). Village and tribal affiliations significantly influenced these suggestions, with some tribes and villages being less inclined to recommend conservation measures. Therefore, this study underscores the need for gender-sensitive, culturally appropriate, and location-specific conservation strategies to effectively address human-wildlife conflicts and promote sustainable coexistence. The findings provide a foundation for future research aimed at developing tailored interventions that consider the unique demographic and cultural contexts of communities affected by human-wildlife interactions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34794,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Challenges","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 101108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Challenges","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667010025000289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study assessed the dynamics of human-monkey conflict for communities living adjacent to Sao-hill Forest in Tanzania, with a particular focus on the factors influencing community perceptions of monkey populations, the effectiveness of crop protection measures, and attitudes towards monkey conservation in a rural setting. Quantitative method was used for data collection through a structured questionnaires targeting farmers and community members (n = 240). The key findings showed that 44.2 % of respondents perceived the monkey population as increasing, while 31.7 % believed it was decreasing, and 15.8 % saw it as stable. Gender and village location significantly influenced these perceptions, with males and residents of specific villages being less likely to perceive population changes. For crop protection, domestic dogs (34.2 %) and cow dung (20.0 %) were perceived as the most effective measures, with significant variations in effectiveness perceptions across different tribes. Regarding reasons for disliking monkeys, 56.7 % of respondents cited crop raiding as the primary issue, followed by property destruction (29.6 %) and attacks on chickens (13.8 %). Males were more likely to express dislike towards monkeys. Conservation suggestions were diverse, with conservation education being the most recommended (36.7 %), followed by fencing farms (25.4 %), and protecting monkey habitats (21.7 %). Village and tribal affiliations significantly influenced these suggestions, with some tribes and villages being less inclined to recommend conservation measures. Therefore, this study underscores the need for gender-sensitive, culturally appropriate, and location-specific conservation strategies to effectively address human-wildlife conflicts and promote sustainable coexistence. The findings provide a foundation for future research aimed at developing tailored interventions that consider the unique demographic and cultural contexts of communities affected by human-wildlife interactions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Challenges
Environmental Challenges Environmental Science-Environmental Engineering
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
249
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Optimizing Empirical and Hybrid Modeling for Advanced Canopy Chlorophyll and Nitrogen Retrieval Technique Using EnMAP Data The role of technological innovation in sustainable growth: Exploring the economic impact of green innovation and renewable energy Human-wildlife interaction: Living with monkeys adjacent to Sao-hill Forest in Tanzania Predicting heat-related morbidity in Japan through integrated meteorological and behavioral factors Environmental factors related to biophysical suitability and agronomic effects of biodegradable mulch applications: Benchmarking key variables using machine learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1