{"title":"Comprehensive analysis of adverse events associated with T-cell engagers using the FAERS database.","authors":"Xiangyang Le, Yefu Zhang, Junlong Ma","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2470875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>T-cell engagers (TCEs) are transformative immunotherapies with significant potential in treating hematologic malignancies and solid tumors. However, their real-world safety profiles remain inadequately characterized.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database (October 2019 - September 2024, 8,747,158 reports), we analyzed adverse events (AEs) associated with nine TCEs. Disproportionality analysis identified overreported AEs, with 11,963 unique reports analyzed after deduplication.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Blinatumomab was the most reported TCE (<i>n</i> = 4,950), and Tarlatamab the least (<i>n</i> = 185). Predominant AEs included immune system disorders, particularly cytokine release syndrome (IC<sub>025</sub> range: 6.08 - 7.47). Drug-specific signals included reproductive system and breast disorders (IC<sub>025</sub>: 2.74) and vascular disorders (IC<sub>025</sub>: 2.25) with Tebentafusp, renal and urinary disorders with Epcoritamab (IC<sub>025</sub>: 1.84), and eye disorders with Elranatamab (IC<sub>025</sub>: 1.81). Novel AEs were also uncovered, including secondary malignant neoplasms, vasogenic cerebral edema with Mosunetuzumab (IC<sub>025</sub>: 5.77, ROR<sub>025</sub>: 56.29), and hydronephrosis with Epcoritamab (IC<sub>025</sub>: 7.50, ROR<sub>025</sub>: 180.70). Early-onset events (0.5 - 9.5 days) were linked to four TCEs, while delayed-onset events (>20 days) were linked to five others.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights diverse AE profiles of TCEs, providing insights for clinicians to optimize their safe use in practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2025.2470875","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: T-cell engagers (TCEs) are transformative immunotherapies with significant potential in treating hematologic malignancies and solid tumors. However, their real-world safety profiles remain inadequately characterized.
Research design and methods: Using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database (October 2019 - September 2024, 8,747,158 reports), we analyzed adverse events (AEs) associated with nine TCEs. Disproportionality analysis identified overreported AEs, with 11,963 unique reports analyzed after deduplication.
Results: Blinatumomab was the most reported TCE (n = 4,950), and Tarlatamab the least (n = 185). Predominant AEs included immune system disorders, particularly cytokine release syndrome (IC025 range: 6.08 - 7.47). Drug-specific signals included reproductive system and breast disorders (IC025: 2.74) and vascular disorders (IC025: 2.25) with Tebentafusp, renal and urinary disorders with Epcoritamab (IC025: 1.84), and eye disorders with Elranatamab (IC025: 1.81). Novel AEs were also uncovered, including secondary malignant neoplasms, vasogenic cerebral edema with Mosunetuzumab (IC025: 5.77, ROR025: 56.29), and hydronephrosis with Epcoritamab (IC025: 7.50, ROR025: 180.70). Early-onset events (0.5 - 9.5 days) were linked to four TCEs, while delayed-onset events (>20 days) were linked to five others.
Conclusions: This study highlights diverse AE profiles of TCEs, providing insights for clinicians to optimize their safe use in practice.
期刊介绍:
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports.
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.