The Benefits of Research-Embedded Training Camps in Sport Sciences.

Abstract

Background: Sport scientists aim to enhance athletic performance by developing, implementing, and evaluating evidence-based strategies. However, a common challenge to maximize sport science's impact is the limited involvement of "research end users" (ie, athletes, coaches, and practitioners) in contextualizing these strategies. To address this, research-embedded training camps (RETCs) offer a collaborative opportunity bringing together all stakeholders to tackle real-world challenges by blending scientific insight with practical application for better knowledge translation or production.

Purpose: This invited commentary explores the behind-the-scenes aspects of conducting successful RETCs. We discuss opportunities and challenges involved, drawing on our practical experience with environmental stress interventions.

Evidence: Implementing an RETC requires a tailored intervention, shaped by the athlete group, research questions, and available resources-essentially answering the who, what, why, when, and where questions. Key principles for success include an athlete-centered focus, a diverse multidisciplinary team, scientific rigor, balancing control with flexibility, and adaptability. A coconstructed design ensures that the intervention remains scientifically relevant and practical and directly addresses real-world needs of athletes.

Conclusion: Through the lens of environmental stress interventions, RETCs should prioritize practicality, collaboration, and athlete-focused approaches. Conducting interventions with athletes rather than on them can significantly enhance performance and support evidence-based training strategies (knowledge translation) and/or provide new actionable insights (knowledge production).