A left-posterior approach to the superior mesenteric artery during robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences Pub Date : 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1002/jhbp.12120
Sho Kiritani, Yosuke Inoue, Takafumi Sato, Yui Sawa, Kosuke Kobayashi, Atsushi Oba, Yoshihiro Ono, Hiromichi Ito, Yu Takahashi
{"title":"A left-posterior approach to the superior mesenteric artery during robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy.","authors":"Sho Kiritani, Yosuke Inoue, Takafumi Sato, Yui Sawa, Kosuke Kobayashi, Atsushi Oba, Yoshihiro Ono, Hiromichi Ito, Yu Takahashi","doi":"10.1002/jhbp.12120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A complete dissection around the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) with artery-first concept is crucial during pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary cancers. The left-posterior (LP) approach to the SMA may be effective during robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD), but data on its technical feasibility and clinical outcomes are limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 83 RPD patients utilizing the LP approach, dividing them into early (n = 42) and late (n = 41) groups to assess procedural maturity. The LP approach was initiated at the first phase of resection to achieve circumferential SMA dissection from the left and posterior aspect and early vascular control through ligation of the inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery (IPDA). Postoperative short-term outcomes were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The late group demonstrated significantly shorter operative times (518 vs. 626 min; p < .01) and higher rates of IPDA ligation (90% vs. 71%; p = .03). The median blood loss in the late group was 50 mL (65 mL in the early group; p = .39). Lymph node retrieval number was 17 in both (p = .81), and R0 resection was achieved in all late group cases (96% in the early group; p = .35).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With experience from approximately 80 cases, the LP approach for RPD has enabled precise SMA dissection and early vascular control. A stable and super-magnified caudal view provided by robotic surgery is particularly advantageous for this approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":16056,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.12120","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A complete dissection around the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) with artery-first concept is crucial during pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary cancers. The left-posterior (LP) approach to the SMA may be effective during robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD), but data on its technical feasibility and clinical outcomes are limited.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 83 RPD patients utilizing the LP approach, dividing them into early (n = 42) and late (n = 41) groups to assess procedural maturity. The LP approach was initiated at the first phase of resection to achieve circumferential SMA dissection from the left and posterior aspect and early vascular control through ligation of the inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery (IPDA). Postoperative short-term outcomes were compared between the two groups.

Results: The late group demonstrated significantly shorter operative times (518 vs. 626 min; p < .01) and higher rates of IPDA ligation (90% vs. 71%; p = .03). The median blood loss in the late group was 50 mL (65 mL in the early group; p = .39). Lymph node retrieval number was 17 in both (p = .81), and R0 resection was achieved in all late group cases (96% in the early group; p = .35).

Conclusions: With experience from approximately 80 cases, the LP approach for RPD has enabled precise SMA dissection and early vascular control. A stable and super-magnified caudal view provided by robotic surgery is particularly advantageous for this approach.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences
Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-SURGERY
自引率
10.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences (JHBPS) is the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences. JHBPS publishes articles dealing with clinical research as well as translational research on all aspects of this field. Coverage includes Original Article, Review Article, Images of Interest, Rapid Communication and an announcement section. Letters to the Editor and comments on the journal’s policies or content are also included. JHBPS welcomes submissions from surgeons, physicians, endoscopists, radiologists, oncologists, and pathologists.
期刊最新文献
A left-posterior approach to the superior mesenteric artery during robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy. Living-donor liver transplantation using donors older than 50 years of age: Recipient criteria and donor risk: A multicenter study of Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery. A rare case of needle tract seeding following endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for cholangiocarcinoma. The impact of extra-pancreatic infections on outcomes of acute pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. High preoperative Glasgow prognostic score increases a risk of hospital mortality in elderly patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1