Sex differences in the prescription of antihypertensive medications in primary care patients: an observational study.

IF 2 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE BJGP Open Pub Date : 2025-10-27 Print Date: 2025-10-01 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0116
Elisa Dal Canto, Sophie L Theunisse, Michiel L Bots, Frans Rutten, Marion Biermans, N Charlotte Onland-Moret, Wilko Spiering, Birsen Kiliç, Hester M den Ruijter, Monika Hollander
{"title":"Sex differences in the prescription of antihypertensive medications in primary care patients: an observational study.","authors":"Elisa Dal Canto, Sophie L Theunisse, Michiel L Bots, Frans Rutten, Marion Biermans, N Charlotte Onland-Moret, Wilko Spiering, Birsen Kiliç, Hester M den Ruijter, Monika Hollander","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pharmacological prescription guidelines for hypertension lack differentiation between the sexes, despite reported sex differences in prevalence, awareness, pathophysiology, and pharmacological response.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess prescription patterns of blood pressure-lowering medication among females and males in primary care.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>In this observational study, which was undertaken in the Netherlands, we analysed data collected in 2018 during routine primary care practice among those pharmacologically treated for elevated blood pressure, and free from cardiovascular comorbidities or diabetes mellitus.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We assessed sex differences in the number of prescribed drugs, defined daily dosage, type of antihypertensive medication, and blood pressure control. We adjusted for differences between sexes in age and other covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 8596 females and 5788 males. Both females and males were prescribed on average 1.8 antihypertensive agents per person. Females compared with males were prescribed a significantly lower defined daily dosage (1.8 versus 2.1, <i>P</i><0.001), more often received beta-blockers (35.4% versus 26.3%, <i>P</i><0.001) and diuretics (53.7% versus 50.5%, <i>P</i><0.001), while receiving fewer angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (35.4% versus 46.3%, <i>P</i><0.001), and calcium channel blockers (28.5% versus 35.6%, <i>P</i><0.001). No sex differences were found for angiotensin receptor blockers (24.3 versus 24.4%, <i>P</i> = 0.842). Importantly, females had significantly better controlled hypertension than males (50.2% versus 45.5%, <i>P</i><0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In those pharmacologically treated for elevated blood pressure, differences between females and males exist in defined daily dosage, type of antihypertensive medication, and blood pressure control, with females achieving better hypertension control than males with different type of medication and lower dosage.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12728875/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pharmacological prescription guidelines for hypertension lack differentiation between the sexes, despite reported sex differences in prevalence, awareness, pathophysiology, and pharmacological response.

Aim: To assess prescription patterns of blood pressure-lowering medication among females and males in primary care.

Design & setting: In this observational study, which was undertaken in the Netherlands, we analysed data collected in 2018 during routine primary care practice among those pharmacologically treated for elevated blood pressure, and free from cardiovascular comorbidities or diabetes mellitus.

Method: We assessed sex differences in the number of prescribed drugs, defined daily dosage, type of antihypertensive medication, and blood pressure control. We adjusted for differences between sexes in age and other covariates.

Results: This study included 8596 females and 5788 males. Both females and males were prescribed on average 1.8 antihypertensive agents per person. Females compared with males were prescribed a significantly lower defined daily dosage (1.8 versus 2.1, P<0.001), more often received beta-blockers (35.4% versus 26.3%, P<0.001) and diuretics (53.7% versus 50.5%, P<0.001), while receiving fewer angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (35.4% versus 46.3%, P<0.001), and calcium channel blockers (28.5% versus 35.6%, P<0.001). No sex differences were found for angiotensin receptor blockers (24.3 versus 24.4%, P = 0.842). Importantly, females had significantly better controlled hypertension than males (50.2% versus 45.5%, P<0.001).

Conclusion: In those pharmacologically treated for elevated blood pressure, differences between females and males exist in defined daily dosage, type of antihypertensive medication, and blood pressure control, with females achieving better hypertension control than males with different type of medication and lower dosage.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
初级保健患者抗高血压药物处方的性别差异。
背景:尽管有报道称高血压的患病率、意识、病理生理和药理反应存在性别差异,但高血压的药理学处方指南缺乏性别差异。目的:我们的目的是评估初级保健中女性和男性降压药的处方模式。设计与背景:我们分析了2018年在常规初级保健实践中收集的数据,这些数据来自于接受过高血压药物治疗且无心血管合并症或糖尿病的患者。方法:我们评估处方药物数量、限定日剂量、降压药类型和血压控制方面的性别差异。我们调整了年龄和其他协变量的性别差异。结果:这项观察性研究包括8596名女性和5788名男性。女性和男性每人平均服用1.8种抗高血压药物。与男性相比,女性的规定日剂量明显较低(1.8 vs 2.1, PPPPPP=0.842)。重要的是,女性的高血压控制明显优于男性(50.2% vs 45.5%)。结论:在高血压药物治疗中,女性和男性在确定的日剂量、降压药类型和血压控制方面存在差异,不同药物类型和较低剂量下女性的高血压控制效果优于男性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
The BJGP Open Top 10 Most Read Research Articles of 2025: an editorial. How feasible is self-monitoring for the management of prehypertension? The REVERSE study. General practice communication: experiences of older Greek patients with limited English proficiency. Optimal medical management in primary care for individuals with chronic breathlessness (OptiMed). English general practice in a period of change: a mixed-methods study of staff and patient perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1