Making Healthcare Decisions on Behalf of People in a Disorder of Consciousness. A "Risk-Making" Theory of Decisional Practices.

Q1 Neuroscience AJOB Neuroscience Pub Date : 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1080/21507740.2025.2464112
Teresa Clark, Alison Edgley, Roger Kerry
{"title":"Making Healthcare Decisions on Behalf of People in a Disorder of Consciousness. A \"Risk-Making\" Theory of Decisional Practices.","authors":"Teresa Clark, Alison Edgley, Roger Kerry","doi":"10.1080/21507740.2025.2464112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Healthcare decisions evaluate treatment risks and benefits, using a shared decision-making process between patient and clinician. Healthcare workers (HCWs) offer treatments based on condition specific evidence and expert knowledge. The patient evaluates treatment choices from their individual perception of how helpful or harmful treatment might be. This is a \"risk-taking\" decision. Those in a disorder of consciousness (DOC) have unreliable or absent awareness. They cannot participate in the risk-taking decisional process outlined above. Instead, family members and HCWs evaluate the options and determine how much risk is acceptable. We propose this is a distinctly different decisional process called \"risk-making,\" and that for those in a DOC it is influenced by multiple poorly understood factors. The different ways that decisions are made on their behalf may be negatively impacting their healthcare and creating a distributive justice need. A \"risk-making\" theory of DOC healthcare decision-making was developed via narrative literature review. It aims to explicate the realities of DOC decision-making practices, and surface rarely discussed assumptions and social factors possibly impacting DOC healthcare for discussion and future exploration.</p>","PeriodicalId":39022,"journal":{"name":"AJOB Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJOB Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21507740.2025.2464112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Neuroscience","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Healthcare decisions evaluate treatment risks and benefits, using a shared decision-making process between patient and clinician. Healthcare workers (HCWs) offer treatments based on condition specific evidence and expert knowledge. The patient evaluates treatment choices from their individual perception of how helpful or harmful treatment might be. This is a "risk-taking" decision. Those in a disorder of consciousness (DOC) have unreliable or absent awareness. They cannot participate in the risk-taking decisional process outlined above. Instead, family members and HCWs evaluate the options and determine how much risk is acceptable. We propose this is a distinctly different decisional process called "risk-making," and that for those in a DOC it is influenced by multiple poorly understood factors. The different ways that decisions are made on their behalf may be negatively impacting their healthcare and creating a distributive justice need. A "risk-making" theory of DOC healthcare decision-making was developed via narrative literature review. It aims to explicate the realities of DOC decision-making practices, and surface rarely discussed assumptions and social factors possibly impacting DOC healthcare for discussion and future exploration.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
代表意识障碍患者做出医疗决策。决策实践的 "冒险 "理论。
医疗保健决策通过患者和临床医生共同决策的过程来评估治疗的风险和益处。医护人员(HCW)根据具体病情的证据和专家知识提供治疗方案。患者根据自己对治疗可能产生的帮助或危害的个人认知来评估治疗选择。这是一个 "承担风险 "的决定。意识障碍(DOC)患者的意识不可靠或缺失。他们无法参与上述冒险决策过程。相反,家庭成员和医护人员会对各种选择进行评估,并决定可接受的风险程度。我们认为这是一个截然不同的决策过程,被称为 "风险决策",而对于 DOC 中的人来说,这一过程受到多种鲜为人知的因素的影响。代表他们做出决定的不同方式可能会对他们的医疗保健产生负面影响,并产生分配正义的需求。通过文献综述,我们提出了 DOC 医疗决策的 "风险决策 "理论。该理论旨在阐述 DOC 决策实践的现实情况,并揭示可能影响 DOC 医疗保健的鲜有讨论的假设和社会因素,以供讨论和未来探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AJOB Neuroscience
AJOB Neuroscience Neuroscience-Neuroscience (all)
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
期刊最新文献
Making Healthcare Decisions on Behalf of People in a Disorder of Consciousness. A "Risk-Making" Theory of Decisional Practices. Mentoring for Neuroscience and Society Careers: Lessons Learned from the Dana Foundation Career Network in Neuroscience & Society. From Scholarship to Practice: Standardizing Calls to Action in Neuroethics. Qualitative Metascience: A Framework for Cultivating Healthier and More Translationally Impactful Neuroscience-Neuroethics Research Ecosystems. Deep Brain Stimulation and Neuropsychiatric Anthropology - The "Prosthetisability" of the Lifeworld.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1