The immunogenicity, reactogenicity, and safety of a bivalent mRNA or protein COVID-19 vaccine given as a fourth dose.

IF 14.3 1区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Journal of Infection Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1016/j.jinf.2025.106447
Nadia Mazarakis, Zheng Quan Toh, Eleanor Neal, Kathryn Bright, Skyy Luu, Leanne Quah, Yan Yung Ng, Cattram Nguyen, John Hart, Lien Anh Ha Do, Anna Rudel, Shashini Dassanayake, Rachel A Higgins, Darren Suryawijaya Ong, Fran Justice, Kerryn A Moore, Emma Watts, Siddhartha Mahanty, Kanta Subbarao, Kim Mulholland, Claire von Mollendorf, Paul V Licciardi
{"title":"The immunogenicity, reactogenicity, and safety of a bivalent mRNA or protein COVID-19 vaccine given as a fourth dose.","authors":"Nadia Mazarakis, Zheng Quan Toh, Eleanor Neal, Kathryn Bright, Skyy Luu, Leanne Quah, Yan Yung Ng, Cattram Nguyen, John Hart, Lien Anh Ha Do, Anna Rudel, Shashini Dassanayake, Rachel A Higgins, Darren Suryawijaya Ong, Fran Justice, Kerryn A Moore, Emma Watts, Siddhartha Mahanty, Kanta Subbarao, Kim Mulholland, Claire von Mollendorf, Paul V Licciardi","doi":"10.1016/j.jinf.2025.106447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We conducted a randomised controlled trial (RCT) to compare immunogenicity, reactogenicity and safety one month after a fourth COVID-19 mRNA or protein vaccine dose.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This RCT recruited healthy adults in Melbourne, Australia, who had previously received three COVID-19 vaccine doses at least six months prior and had no SARS-CoV-2 infection in the last three months. The participants were randomised (1:1) to receive the bivalent mRNA vaccine (mRNA-1273.214/mRNA-1273.222, hereafter Moderna) or protein vaccine (NVX-CoV-2373, hereafter Novavax) as a fourth dose. A self-selected control group who elected not to receive an additional dose were also included. The co-primary endpoints compared immunogenicity at 28 days post-vaccination measured as binding antibodies (IgG against Ancestral and Omicron subvariants; BA.1, BA.4/5 and JN.1) between the two vaccine groups, and reactogenicity within one-week post-vaccination.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov Identifier: NCT05543356.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between Feb 28 and Oct 4, 2023, 496 participants were enrolled into the study. Participants were randomised into either the bivalent mRNA Moderna (n=177) or protein Novavax (n=176) vaccine groups, with n=143 allocated to the control group. The geometric mean ratio (GMR) of anti-Spike binding IgG antibody levels were higher for the Moderna vaccine compared to the Novavax vaccine at 28 days post-vaccination for all variants tested, including Ancestral (GMR: 2.11, 95% CI: 1.88 - 2.37), BA.1 (GMR: 2.32, 95% CI 2.04 - 2.63), BA.4/5 (GMR: 2.32, 95% CI: 2.04 - 2.65), and JN.1 (GMR: 2.40, 95% CI: 2.14 - 2.70). The frequency of any local and systemic reactions (grades 1-4) was higher for the Moderna vaccine (159/177; 89.8%) compared to the Novavax vaccine (130/176; 73.9%). Serious reactions (grade 3-4) between the groups were similar (11/177; 6.2%, versus 9/176; 5.1%, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>At day 28 post-vaccination, higher immunogenicity was observed following Moderna vaccination compared to Novavax vaccination when given as a fourth dose in healthy adults for Ancestral and Omicron subvariants, including JN.1. However, local and systemic reactogenicity was higher in the Moderna vaccine group compared with the Novavax vaccine group. These results may have important implications for ongoing booster strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":50180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection","volume":" ","pages":"106447"},"PeriodicalIF":14.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2025.106447","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: We conducted a randomised controlled trial (RCT) to compare immunogenicity, reactogenicity and safety one month after a fourth COVID-19 mRNA or protein vaccine dose.

Methods: This RCT recruited healthy adults in Melbourne, Australia, who had previously received three COVID-19 vaccine doses at least six months prior and had no SARS-CoV-2 infection in the last three months. The participants were randomised (1:1) to receive the bivalent mRNA vaccine (mRNA-1273.214/mRNA-1273.222, hereafter Moderna) or protein vaccine (NVX-CoV-2373, hereafter Novavax) as a fourth dose. A self-selected control group who elected not to receive an additional dose were also included. The co-primary endpoints compared immunogenicity at 28 days post-vaccination measured as binding antibodies (IgG against Ancestral and Omicron subvariants; BA.1, BA.4/5 and JN.1) between the two vaccine groups, and reactogenicity within one-week post-vaccination.

Clinicaltrials: gov Identifier: NCT05543356.

Results: Between Feb 28 and Oct 4, 2023, 496 participants were enrolled into the study. Participants were randomised into either the bivalent mRNA Moderna (n=177) or protein Novavax (n=176) vaccine groups, with n=143 allocated to the control group. The geometric mean ratio (GMR) of anti-Spike binding IgG antibody levels were higher for the Moderna vaccine compared to the Novavax vaccine at 28 days post-vaccination for all variants tested, including Ancestral (GMR: 2.11, 95% CI: 1.88 - 2.37), BA.1 (GMR: 2.32, 95% CI 2.04 - 2.63), BA.4/5 (GMR: 2.32, 95% CI: 2.04 - 2.65), and JN.1 (GMR: 2.40, 95% CI: 2.14 - 2.70). The frequency of any local and systemic reactions (grades 1-4) was higher for the Moderna vaccine (159/177; 89.8%) compared to the Novavax vaccine (130/176; 73.9%). Serious reactions (grade 3-4) between the groups were similar (11/177; 6.2%, versus 9/176; 5.1%, respectively).

Conclusion: At day 28 post-vaccination, higher immunogenicity was observed following Moderna vaccination compared to Novavax vaccination when given as a fourth dose in healthy adults for Ancestral and Omicron subvariants, including JN.1. However, local and systemic reactogenicity was higher in the Moderna vaccine group compared with the Novavax vaccine group. These results may have important implications for ongoing booster strategies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Infection
Journal of Infection 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
45.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
475
审稿时长
16 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Infection publishes original papers on all aspects of infection - clinical, microbiological and epidemiological. The Journal seeks to bring together knowledge from all specialties involved in infection research and clinical practice, and present the best work in the ever-changing field of infection. Each issue brings you Editorials that describe current or controversial topics of interest, high quality Reviews to keep you in touch with the latest developments in specific fields of interest, an Epidemiology section reporting studies in the hospital and the general community, and a lively correspondence section.
期刊最新文献
The immunogenicity, reactogenicity, and safety of a bivalent mRNA or protein COVID-19 vaccine given as a fourth dose. Genetic characterization of Haemophilus ducreyi from non-genital skin lesions in Cameroon. Past, present and future epidemiology of echinococcosis in China based on nationwide surveillance data 2004–2022 Universal opt-out syphilis screening in a UK emergency department. Incidence of RSV-related hospitalizations for ARIs, including CAP: Data from the German prospective ThEpiCAP study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1